- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Einstein Proven Wrong Yet Again RE: Quantum Entanglement
Posted on 10/25/15 at 8:21 pm to sullivanct19a
Posted on 10/25/15 at 8:21 pm to sullivanct19a
The first question on my first quantum test at LSU started with, 'Prove Einstein wrong...'
Pretty much all of quantum proves Einstein wrong. No big deal, he was right a helluva lot regarding all sorts of physics principles.
Pretty much all of quantum proves Einstein wrong. No big deal, he was right a helluva lot regarding all sorts of physics principles.
1
Posted on 10/25/15 at 8:35 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
Wait, isn't the science on this stuff settled just like with climate change?
Posted on 10/25/15 at 9:06 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
A lot of info there, I'll just wait for Sheldon to explain it to us on Big Bang Theory!!!
Posted on 10/25/15 at 9:23 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
ETI civilizations are more than likely millions if not billions of years more advanced than our civilization. Breakthroughs like this open up endless communication possibilities with ETIs and the possibility of temporal travel
Not yet. Quantam entanglement has yet to prove that information can be transmitted faster than the speed of light.
Posted on 10/25/15 at 9:46 pm to Gaston
quote:
No big deal, he was right a helluva lot regarding all sorts of physics principles.
This is really the thing. No shite Einstein wasn't infallible. No one is. That isn't a knock against him. Only religious fanatics expect infallibility.
Posted on 10/25/15 at 9:54 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
Interesting. If you are interested in this stuff check out "Biocentrism" by Dr. Robert Lanza. The brings up this same subject.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 5:28 am to La Place Mike
I'm really only interested in the ETI implications and temporal travel, but I'll give it a look.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 6:01 am to OleWarSkuleAlum
I learned about this shite playing Mass Effect 2
Posted on 10/26/15 at 6:02 am to OleWarSkuleAlum
I was looking at their math this morning and I am pretty certain they didn't carry a 1.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 6:06 am to jeffsdad
quote:
I was looking at their math this morning and I am pretty certain they didn't carry a 1.
They didn't need to they were doing the Math according to the Common Core curriculum.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 7:37 am to sullivanct19a
quote:
But now, one lab has results that may contradict some of what Einstein put forth.
No. Quantum mechanics has nothing to do with general relativity.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:52 am to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
ETI civilizations are more than likely millions if not billions of years more advanced than our civilization. Breakthroughs like this open up endless communication possibilities with ETIs and the possibility of temporal travel.
But we just discovered that earth is older than 93% of planets that can sustain life.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:16 am to OleWarSkuleAlum
Smh @ einstein 
what a #loser #failure #getittogether #getabrainmoran
what a #loser #failure #getittogether #getabrainmoranThis post was edited on 10/26/15 at 9:18 am
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:20 am to blueboy
quote:
Einstein's work is a crime against humanity.
No, that would be religious dogma.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:38 am to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
Bas Hensen, left, and Ronald Hanson helped show that objects apart can instantly affect each other. But since the 1970s, a series of precise experiments by physicists are increasingly erasing doubt — alternative explanations that are referred to as loopholes — that two previously entangled particles, even if separated by the width of the universe, could instantly interact.
When trying to rationalize entanglement, I have theorized that there is a dimension of reality which we are unable to perceive in which all matter is equidistant, and this distance is infinitesimally small.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:55 am to CptRusty
quote:
CptRusty
When trying to rationalize entanglement, I have theorized that there is a dimension of reality which we are unable to perceive in which all matter is equidistant, and this distance is infinitesimally small.
Or... rather than another "dimension", there could be another force interacting on matter that we are just now beginning to observe through experimentation.
Not disputing your thought just simply taking a little different angle..
This post was edited on 10/26/15 at 9:58 am
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News