- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dr. Pierre Kory, a frontline Covid Critical Care expert - on Bret Weinstein's podcast
Posted on 6/3/21 at 7:16 am to deathvalleytiger10
Posted on 6/3/21 at 7:16 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:Or has political (versus medical) motivations.
Any physician that disputes this is not reading the research, is scared of being fired, or a lazy practitioner.
0
Posted on 6/12/21 at 3:28 am to baobabtiger
Youtube officially took down the video for "violating community guidelines".
It was a long-form discussion with a legit medical expert in the field about possible safe and cheap medicines for a pandemic. Not allowed.
That is wild.
It was a long-form discussion with a legit medical expert in the field about possible safe and cheap medicines for a pandemic. Not allowed.
That is wild.
Posted on 6/12/21 at 4:51 am to buford4LSU
quote:Well of course that's not true.
IF THERE IS A THERAPEUTIC then A VACCINE IS NOT NEEDED
------------------
The point of the OP is that a bright physician was punished/shunned for promoting actual scientific/medical findings. E.g., ivermectin may well be helpful in countries lacking better alternatives.
Just as should have been the situation here last year with HCQ. Until there was a feasible alternative, HCQ should have seen widespread use. The anti-HCQ hysteria was disturbing on several levels.
Meanwhile, promarxist IT geeks at youtube, twitter, and facebook, who know less about medical science than does the average Uber Driver, are deciding what does or doesn't fall to the realm of "acceptable science".
Those areas should be the focal points.
------------------
Distracting from those points and their idiocy with your own medical stupidity is not helpful.
This post was edited on 6/12/21 at 4:52 am
Posted on 6/12/21 at 1:34 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The point of the OP is that a bright physician was punished/shunned for promoting actual scientific/medical findings. E.g., ivermectin may well be helpful in countries lacking better alternatives.
Just as should have been the situation here last year with HCQ. Until there was a feasible alternative, HCQ should have seen widespread use. The anti-HCQ hysteria was disturbing on several levels.
Meanwhile, promarxist IT geeks at youtube, twitter, and facebook, who know less about medical science than does the average Uber Driver, are deciding what does or doesn't fall to the realm of "acceptable science".
Those areas should be the focal points.
Correct. Ivermectin is much safer to take than HCQ though. It's an incredibly safe drug, so really there is no risk to trying it.
Even if Ivermectin doesn't work, it should worry scientists and society in general that media corporations and their political allies are punishing and silencing scientists who have unapproved ideas.
I am very liberal, btw. Just not a Democrat any longer.
This post was edited on 6/12/21 at 1:39 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News