Started By
Message

re: Derek Chauvin trial - GUILTY ON ALL CHARGES. Update: His sentencing is today

Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:18 am to
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:18 am to
Wasn’t there testimony that they asked for more cops for crowd control?
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216476 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:18 am to
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6537 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:20 am to
quote:


No you wouldn’t.


maybe I'll give you that one.

you believe its perjury to have an opinion that a nonviolent crowd being uneasy and vocally critical of cops is equivalent to an uncontrolled crowd.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:22 am to
Yes and he also testified that a handcuffed person poses no threat. Which is a bold faced lie and he got caught because a few minutes later he testified that it was possible they could.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6537 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:23 am to
quote:

There was one cop controlling the crowd.



so you admit a single cop maintained crowd control and no officers were harmed?
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:25 am to
Why are you only dwelling on this?

Let’s dwell on whether or not a cuffed person is a threat or not?
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216476 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:27 am to
Dude.... 08 is kicking your arse thus far this morning.... and I hate the guy......
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:28 am to
quote:

and I hate the guy......


Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
196633 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:29 am to
quote:

so you admit a single cop maintained crowd control and no officers were harmed?

because they saw what would happen to them
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216476 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:31 am to
What’s so funny????
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:36 am to
You hate me or do you hate tgrbaitn08?

Two people you’ve never met?
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:51 am to
quote:

There was one cop controlling the crowd


And at least one person threatened to "frick him up" if he touched him.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 11:55 am to
quote:



And at least one person threatened to "frick him up" if he touched him.



More than once
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6537 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Let’s dwell on whether or not a cuffed person is a threat or not?

Reread the quotes, you added bias to your interpretation. there are 0 contradictory or false declarations.



he said someone subdued face down in handcuffs 'brings the threat level way down'. this is a true fact.

when asked to elaborate, He responded with a question (not a claim). Lt. Zimmerman asked, 'they're handcuffed how could they hurt you?' admittedly it is a cheeky response but it is not a declaration of fact that there is 0 potential harm. this is where your bias comes into play as you assume it contradicts his answer if it is still possible to be a threat while in handcuffs, he said i suppose so.






Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216476 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 12:00 pm to
I really don’t hate anybody......
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6537 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

And at least one person threatened to "frick him up" if he touched him.



was that captured on the body cam footage Zimmerman was specifically being asked about or was that some other video that was not being being referred to?
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 12:12 pm to
You dumb frick. He specifically said,

quote:

Zimmerman said a person being handcuffed changes the level of force that can be used. "Once a person is cuffed, the threat level goes down all the way to, they're cuffed, how can they really hurt you?" he said. "That person is handcuffed, and the threat level is just not there."


Which is a God Damn lie
Posted by Breauxsif
Member since May 2012
22381 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I think Chauvin was careless (manslaughter possibly) but he shouldn't be pinned with murder.

The city will still burn.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 12:13 pm to
quote:


I really don’t hate anybody......



You would love me irl. I’d make you my bitch
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6537 posts
Posted on 4/3/21 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Once a person is cuffed, the threat level goes down all the way to, they're cuffed, how can they really hurt you?

its obviously a cheeky response, but very far from a declaration of absolute 0 potential danger. it does imply a significantly lower level of threat, which is truth.

quote:

Zimmerman said a person being handcuffed changes the level of force that can be used...... That person is handcuffed, and the threat level is just not there.
someone being handcuffed means de-escalation of force is appropriate, because the person just does not pose the same level of threat to justify the same level of force. he is just explaining the stratification for justifying use of force. none of which is a lie.

you are reaching so far youre gonna rip your arm out of its socket.
This post was edited on 4/3/21 at 12:34 pm
Jump to page
Page First 197 198 199 200 201 ... 524
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 199 of 524Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram