- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:28 am to LATigerdoc
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:28 am to LATigerdoc
quote:
Nurses are fantastic enactors of patient care, we're not disputing that. Doctors are the people educated to manage the patient and deal with complex physiology/medication/disease processes due to THOUSANDS of hours of training and rigorous study
Bitch you just google it like everyone else does these days.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:31 am to MoreOrLes
Medicine is a gray area science.....it is not and never will be one size fits all.
Thats why it is absurd for anyone to "practice medicine" that is not a Medical Doctor. (MD)
This just furthers my belief that patient advocacy is the last thing on a NP's mind AS A GROUP. Its all about the money. You want to be an MD than go to Med School.
Thats why it is absurd for anyone to "practice medicine" that is not a Medical Doctor. (MD)
This just furthers my belief that patient advocacy is the last thing on a NP's mind AS A GROUP. Its all about the money. You want to be an MD than go to Med School.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:36 am to ManBearTiger
quote:
No one in this thread is saying healthcare is a right; we're saying the ability to decide for yourself the quality and cost of healthcare you receive is a right
We aren't arguing that you shouldn't be able to choose your provider. You may choose a provider who is an NP under a physician's supervision today.
We are arguing that there exists a state medical board to oversee the licensing process and set forth standards which governs those practicing medicine, and this group is attempting to circumvent that to intentionally deliver a lower level of care. The real problem is that it's very deceptive, and many people do not understand the difference with regards to their training or the standards they're held to. No one want them to not practice. They just need to be held to the same standard if they don't have someone held to that standard overseeing them.
This post was edited on 5/12/16 at 8:37 am
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:36 am to MoreOrLes
quote:
You want to be an MD than go to Med School.
What if you simply want to set broken bones and nothing else?
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:38 am to Hopeful Doc
quote:
They just need to be held to the same standard if they don't have someone held to that standard overseeing them.
Why wouldn't they be held to the same standards doctors are under the state medical board?
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:38 am to ManBearTiger
How do you think they are going about enacting universal healthcare? They, like you, are encouraging shortcuts around medical school in order to account for the increased volume. It's going to have consequences.
But that is the whole mantra of the left. Instead of paying customers having excellent healthcare and those who can't afford it having average healthcare, they would rather EVERYONE have average healthcare. Except those in power of course... they can continue to have their access to the best.
But that is the whole mantra of the left. Instead of paying customers having excellent healthcare and those who can't afford it having average healthcare, they would rather EVERYONE have average healthcare. Except those in power of course... they can continue to have their access to the best.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:39 am to Restomod
quote:
Some, but not all. Those that are, it's not 100% online.
You are correct, some but not all and they are not 100% online. The part that is not online is the clinical part. I know several current NP students on different online programs. The students in these programs are responsible for setting up their own clinical rotations. As in, they find a physician or np that will let them rotate with them. Their school doesnt. Obviously this results in a spectrum of different clinical experiences from student to student in these particular programs at least.
quote:
This is incorrect, many programs have residencies and fellowships.
Interesting. I did not know that. Ill have to look into that. I dont even think my friends in np school knew that either. Anyway, if there are residencies out there, great. Every NP should do a residency. The vast majority do not.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:39 am to ManBearTiger
quote:
We're saying the ability to decide for yourself the quality and cost of healthcare you receive is a right
Duuuude
Just stop for a second and think about this
You have the right to go to a NP today
In the current system what right don't you have today? Just answer that simple question
Current system:
MD visit $100
NP visit for a chronic isssue $100
NP visit for a new issue $85
Proposed system:
MD visit $100
Np visit $85
Consider it a $15 insurance policy that a MD is backing them up. How far do you think that $15 savings will go when NPs are seeing people too frequently or ordering unnecessary tests/referrals because they are unsure of themselves.
Hell if they order 1 extra MRI a month that would likely offset all healthcare savings generated
This post was edited on 5/12/16 at 8:48 am
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:46 am to ManBearTiger
What if they give you pain medicine for your bitching and moaning about your broken pinky toe but don't fully understand pharmacokinetics and cause a drug interaction? What if they trash your kidneys because you have a comorbidity they fail to recognize?
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:49 am to Bmath
quote:
Dentists can complete two years of medical school and a residency to become a DDS, MD that specializes in oral surgery.
At LSUHSC-NO it's 3 years of medical school + residency.
The reason they're allowed to do this is because they took enough basic sciences in dental school to advance out of some of medical school. Some special consideration is given to OD-->MD, but it's not a standard track at this point. There's not really a good reason why not.
But in terms of NP/PA--> MD, the basic sciences are, for the most part, taught at very different levels. Theirs are not as in depth and, thus, don't qualify them to substitute it for the MD version.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:51 am to ManBearTiger
quote:
Why wouldn't they be held to the same standards doctors are under the state medical board?
Because the bill which we are talking about specifically states that they will be practicing under a nursing license and exempt from oversight by the LSBME.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:54 am to Hopeful Doc
I will vote the way you vote. Hopeful Doc is good, Hopeful Doc is wise.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:55 am to Blob Fish
That is a possibility with a doctor and happens all the time.
Either abolish the $500,000 medical malpractice award limit or open up the scope of practice for qualified nurses to practice certain procedures unsupervised and at their own rate of pay and keep the $500,000 limit.
That's pretty much where I'm situated on this issue and I'd say my position is intractable.
Either abolish the $500,000 medical malpractice award limit or open up the scope of practice for qualified nurses to practice certain procedures unsupervised and at their own rate of pay and keep the $500,000 limit.
That's pretty much where I'm situated on this issue and I'd say my position is intractable.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:57 am to Hopeful Doc
Will any Doc here admit that the root cause of the problem is that the care delivered by a lot of Docs is so poorly delivered that the general population sees no discernible difference in the care deliverers.
All the things that are mentioned here: unnecessary tests, lab orders, etc. these are all things a patient experiences with an MD today. Not to mention the high number of MDs that employ NPs sends a message to patients that they are clinically competent.
The patient rarely sees any collaboration between the two, so in essence the NP is working independently all ready.
All the things that are mentioned here: unnecessary tests, lab orders, etc. these are all things a patient experiences with an MD today. Not to mention the high number of MDs that employ NPs sends a message to patients that they are clinically competent.
The patient rarely sees any collaboration between the two, so in essence the NP is working independently all ready.
This post was edited on 5/12/16 at 9:06 am
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:58 am to Bmath
quote:
Something I found interesting is a conversation my brother recently had with an Ophthalmologist in the clinic he is rotating through as he finishes up his Optometry program. Essentially the Ophthalmologist feels that his Optometrists are better equipped to recognize and treat most eye diseases, and really only handles major surgical procedures in his clinic that Optometrists currently cannot be licensed for. Optometrists are trained from day one of school to provide that level of care, while Ophthalmologists receive general medical training and pick up everything else on the fly through resident training. Therefore their training is not as focused with the exception of surgical techniques. This doctor is of the standpoint that Optometrists already have a leg up in training, and are more than capable to complete a residency to allow them to complete surgeries.
These are the types of wacko statements that scare me about this bill. So your brother the optometrist thinks he has better training than an Ophthalmologist?
Do you realize how far off from reality this is? Ophthalmology residency alone is as long as their entire schooling process. In addition, optometrist don't take call and see emergency patients, don't see hospital inpatients, and don't see 25% of the difficult cases/ pathology that is seen in an ophthalmologists office. You brother will be the guy that keeps trying to manage a complicated patient when he is way over his head, then refer them to an Ophthalmologist when they are a train wreck.
Are you sure he wasn't talking about fitting someone for glasses? I'll admit they are probably better at that
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:59 am to Hopeful Doc
I have no problem with PAs or Nurse Practitioners taking the trivial cases like sore throats/allergies off doctor's hands. I hate waiting at the DR's office because some ahole doesn't want to go to work that day because a "sore throat"
Anything more than common cold should be under DR supervision though
Anything more than common cold should be under DR supervision though
Posted on 5/12/16 at 9:02 am to GenesChin
quote:
Anything more than common cold should be under DR supervision though
The docs in here are trying to make the case that every 1 in 10,000 cases of a patient coming see them for a minor ailment they might catch someone with a life-threatening illness. It's a tenuous, nonsensical argument, but really appeals to the emotions.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 9:05 am to tigerfoot
quote:
Will any Doc here admit that the root cause of the problem is that the care delivered by a lot of Docs is so poorly delivered that the general population sees no discernible difference in the care delivers.
I love my GP and want to see him every time but my wife HATES her's and will only see the NP.
Posted on 5/12/16 at 9:05 am to ManBearTiger
Yeah, you're right. Medical errors are a rare occurrence. 
Popular
Back to top


0





