- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Creationism and Evolution Questions
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:23 pm to Artificial Ignorance
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:23 pm to Artificial Ignorance
It’s the same message today and apparently you and many others fail to see the accuracy of it. But people like you are typical, thinking they are smarter than some old book. But that book has proven itself over and over again throughout history. You refuse to believe it because it would disrupt your life. Time will tell all.
1
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:32 pm to WaydownSouth
quote:
Truth. At some point no matter what you believe, there were only two humans
Um, no. Y’all really don’t understand evolution at all, do you?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:45 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
My learning that Eve’s ribs were born from Adam’s…has never made me pause to think about the number of female ribs. Life design…and scripture’s accurate connection to it…
What the frick does this mean?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 11:15 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
What the frick does this mean?
13 vs 12 ribs.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 11:21 pm to yakster
quote:
apparently you and many others fail to see the accuracy of it. But people like you are typical, thinking they are smarter than some old book. But that book has proven itself over and over again throughout history.
Ever wonder why the book only explains part of the world? Ever wonder why it does not clearly explain Asia and specific parts of Asia (eg, India, China, etc), where most of the world’s population exists? Was Jesus not meant for these parts of the world? The book’s accuracy is part of the problem…the unexplained part.
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 11:22 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 11:26 pm to BestBanker
quote:
God made man in His image. He gave man a helper that came from his own body. Those birthed from original man and woman, mated to create offspring that mimicked the original creation of human from human created: Purity in original design, perhaps.
Sisters and brothers had to have sex to create the world’s population. Does that not bother you? At all?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 11:43 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
13 vs 12 ribs.
Do you think men and women have different numbers of ribs?
Posted on 6/14/25 at 12:02 am to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
Sisters and brothers had to have sex to create the world’s population. Does that not bother you? At all?
I'm not from that time or culture so it didn't apply to me or any of us now. It doesn't bother me. If one follows an evolutionary belief, the same question should be studied because on the cellular level, biology would indicate a similar reproduction method would to be employed at inception as well. One could surmise that if there's only one "blob" that started the engine of humankind, there would also be similar reproduction from that beginning.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 12:07 am to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
Ever wonder why the book only explains part of the world? Ever wonder why it does not clearly explain Asia and specific parts of Asia (eg, India, China, etc), where most of the world’s population exists? Was Jesus not meant for these parts of the world? The book’s accuracy is part of the problem…the unexplained part.
Research Ham, Shem, Japheth. Perhaps ancestral data may indicate connections.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 1:59 am to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
Creationist answer: the wavelengths of light provided your life design (the eye) to capture dat light and occipital nerve to send chemical process to your brain’s occipital lobe to deconstruct that chemistry and other brain parts to re-construct it into chemistry that your human design ascribes meaning to. And your amygdala to get pissed off that a man made construct called a parentheses, that should have open and closed ends, but did not, creating the emotion that drove your response…and stop there…excluding all of the musculoskeletal, endocrine, cardio vascular, and central nervous system collective coordination to have you express your displeasure with my post. And she ate the apple part of course.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 2:17 am to 1BamaRTR
quote:Looking back, the early 1990s optimism about the internet placing knowledge at everyone’s fingertips was naive. It ignored a core truth of human nature: most people aren’t driven by a thirst for knowledge; instead, they search for affirmation. The internet’s ability to create segregated pockets of wildly different core beliefs, especially in testable fields like biological science and physics, is obvious in retrospect, yet still deeply disappointing.
If you told people even a few decades ago we would have all this instant easily accessible info and global connection at our fingertips, they probably would’ve thought people would want to be more knowledgeable and understanding of each other. Instead we’ve become more tribalistic in regards to everything
Posted on 6/14/25 at 2:25 am to Artificial Ignorance
Science can try to explain evolution, even without real proof. But how can they explain the spirtual nature of humans. The miracle of conception and birth is one thing. But the bond and intense love is another. Explain how we and animals love newborns so much that our on life is not as important as theirs. Being alive, how does that happen without God?
Posted on 6/14/25 at 2:53 am to rickyh
quote:Not trying to discount the miracle and beauty of life and love, or anything, but from an evolutionary standpoint, the instinct to love and protect newborns ensures the continuation of one's genetic lineage. For instance, a father might risk his own life to shield his child from danger, increasing the chances that his genes will be passed on. And his behavior is reinforced by kin selection (women desiring a protective mate), as offspring carry 50% of their parent's genes, making their survival directly beneficial. This instinct secures the future of one's lineage and strengthens the species' collective well-being, which encourages the trait over generations.
Explain how we and animals love newborns so much that our on life is not as important as theirs.
This post was edited on 6/14/25 at 2:59 am
Posted on 6/14/25 at 5:03 am to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
13 vs 12 ribs.
lol what?
Posted on 6/14/25 at 5:29 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
lol what?
Your lol. I lol.
There are some people who believe females have 13 ribs. Heard it with my own Eden ears.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 5:35 am to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
There are some people who believe females have 13 ribs.
Some believe women can have a penis and that men can menstruate.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 5:38 am to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
There are some people who believe females have 13 ribs. Heard it with my own Eden ears.
Yeah, I thought that you were one of them.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 5:39 am to BestBanker
quote:
if there's only one "blob" that started the engine of humankind, there would also be similar reproduction from that beginning.
Or was there many blobs in all corners of Earth?
Posted on 6/14/25 at 5:41 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Do you think men and women have different numbers of ribs?
No.
However, and I suppose I should not be surprised, some people do.
Posted on 6/14/25 at 5:56 am to BestBanker
quote:
Incest was not forbidden until the time of Moses, so it was acceptable prior. How do I accept this?
I simply do.
You Redbones are a hoot.
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News