- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Community protests squatters eviction
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:27 pm
LINK
First of all, instead of eviction they should be facing charges for breaking and entering. In regards to the protests, so hard working people who have invested their money in this real estate should be forced to let squatters live there for free?
quote:
Two homeless mothers in Oakland, California who were occupying an vacant residence owned by a development company were evicted Tuesday morning, after hundreds in the community protested Monday to support their fight for affordable housing.
Dominique Walker and Sameerah Karim, members of the local activist collective Moms 4 Housing, were confronted by Alameda County Sheriff deputies early Tuesday, who forced open the door of the home they had been occupying since November.
First of all, instead of eviction they should be facing charges for breaking and entering. In regards to the protests, so hard working people who have invested their money in this real estate should be forced to let squatters live there for free?
13
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:30 pm to crap4brain
quote:
Sameerah Karim
quote:
Moms 4 Housing
so, 2 women occupy a house and start a "collective" so they get a free house?
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:31 pm to crap4brain
You are a heartless bastard.
You have no idea how hard they worked to rescue an underutilized abode
You have no idea how hard they worked to rescue an underutilized abode
This post was edited on 1/15/20 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:32 pm to crap4brain
Affordable housing does not equate to a person's right to essentially steal a home.
This post was edited on 1/15/20 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:32 pm to crap4brain
quote:
Moms 4 Housing
They too stupid to spell “for” out?
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:33 pm to Bullfrog
quote:
You are a heartless bastard.
What if you were forced to let squatters live in your house? Would you call yourself heartless for fighting against it?
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:34 pm to crap4brain
And if there is anywhere I could actually get behind a protest for affordable housing, it would be California.
But, squatters should not be the poster children of your fight.
But, squatters should not be the poster children of your fight.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:34 pm to Bullfrog
frick dem
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:35 pm to crap4brain
Looks to like there’s enough of these “Moms 4 Housing” bitches there if they’d pool their money they could help get these women a place. Or I’m sure some of them have a spare room at their house.
Or are they more interested in being outraged in front of the media cameras than actually helping people?
Or are they more interested in being outraged in front of the media cameras than actually helping people?
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:35 pm to LegendInMyMind
They were squatting which is legal in certain circumstances. Im guessing if a property is condemned/abanfoned and taxes haven't been paid for like 7 years, this situation a REIT bought it a year ago so doesnt work.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:36 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Affordable housing does not equate to a person's right to essentially steal a home
/thread
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:36 pm to crap4brain
Add to that the likely fact that the property owners probably have liability for anything that happens in the house. If one of the bums steps on a nail and gets the lock jaw, who do you think gets sued?
Posted on 1/15/20 at 12:41 pm to crap4brain
It is policies which give folks like this rights that make housing unaffordable.
The extra legal costs are at some point passed on to the eventual owner or renter.
The extra legal costs are at some point passed on to the eventual owner or renter.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:00 pm to crap4brain
Comment I saw online:
Unreal.
quote:
certain people don’t deserve housing and someone has a piece of paper saying that property is theirs, so that person with the paper is more entitled to said ownership of the property than the people *actually living on and using said property*
Unreal.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:00 pm to crap4brain
Owner should have released a German Shepard the first time he noticed the squatters
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:03 pm to crap4brain
I’m thankful every day that I don’t work in a state where illegal squatters have more rights than the property owners.
In general, evictions are much better here too.
Louisiana
In general, evictions are much better here too.
Louisiana 
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:05 pm to mouton
quote:Wait, what part of this do you disagree with?
and someone has a piece of paper saying that property is theirs, so that person with the paper is more entitled to said ownership of the property than the people *actually living on and using said property*
That sounds accurate to me.
This post was edited on 1/15/20 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:05 pm to crap4brain
I typically take the opposite stance of any organization that begins with "Mothers for" or "Mothers against" by default.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:07 pm to shel311
Because she is questioning why the person with the deed to the property should be more entitled tho it’s ownership thank someone squatting there.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 1:07 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I typically take the opposite stance of any organization that begins with "Mothers for" or "Mothers against" by default.
How many DUIs have you had, baw?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News