Started By
Message

re: Cold war history buffs, who were the better spies?

Posted on 7/16/19 at 4:28 pm to
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 7/16/19 at 4:28 pm to
The Mossad is grossly overrated.
Posted by BoardReader
Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
7412 posts
Posted on 7/16/19 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Can you expand on this?


I think one of the ones they prevented initially, was a civil war in Lebanon back in the early 60s, and the need to invade Egypt in the 50s even well before Suez, when German rocket scientists began engaging in a breakneck engineering program to arm Egypt with the tools for WMD. They also preempted a PLO conflict I want to say in '74. They assisted Morocco in murdering a dissident leader in '65 as well.

I really do recommend Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel's Targeted Assassinations, for a decent run down of some of the interesting targeted killings the Israelis conducted.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87730 posts
Posted on 7/16/19 at 4:30 pm to
Overall apparatus - the Soviets, though a huge portion of that is because of an authoritarian regime and authoritarian satellite states with a paranoid and subservient population rather than technique or merit. That (paranoia, authoritarianism) extended, of course, to the intelligence lines themselves.

Of course, they may have had the advantage in the slavish devotion to an ideology, but we had the true ideological advantage. Strange as it may seem, assets motivated by ideological pursuits (be it hatred of one or love of another) were probably more productive than those motivated by fear/force/necessity, at least over the long term.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38566 posts
Posted on 7/16/19 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

It’s not necessarily a fair comparison since free, open-market democracies will be easier to spy on than a closed off communist overly-militaristic shite hole.
This. And the KGB was huge with a half million employees and millions of informants.

The US got more bang for the buck but Soviet paranoia led to them allocating a far larger percentage of their resources to their agencies than we than we did. They may have been better than us at human intel gathering but they should have been given their disproportionate spending, size, and advantage of operating in an authoritarian society. But at the end of the day it was that same paranoia and emphasis on keeping up with the US that ultimately fricked them.

When they declassified their documents after 1991 we found out they had hundreds of operatives in various levels of our government including our nuclear weapons programs. We weren't able to infiltrate on that scale but at the end of the day we didn't have to.
This post was edited on 7/16/19 at 6:00 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106039 posts
Posted on 7/16/19 at 5:53 pm to
Mossad and it's not even close
Posted by Corkfather
Dallas
Member since Sep 2007
19756 posts
Posted on 7/16/19 at 6:07 pm to
The KGB was so successful due in large part to the sheer numbers they had to conduct surveillance, etc. Even low level embassy employees, who may or may not have been CIA, were heavily surveilled by large teams.

The way I look at it, the CIA were excellent spies because of the tradecraft and technology they used to evade the Soviets.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
44187 posts
Posted on 7/16/19 at 8:39 pm to
Thanks
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31592 posts
Posted on 7/16/19 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

The Soviets infiltrated the Manhattan Project greatly speeding up Soviet atomic capability which was a cornerstone of the Cold War.



This. The USSR started the Cold War off with such a huge spy ordeal.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram