Started By
Message

re: Carbon capture tech a 'complete falsehood', says Fortescue Metals chairman

Posted on 2/16/24 at 6:30 pm to
Posted by lsugradman
Member since Sep 2003
8886 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 6:30 pm to
Posted by Mr Breeze
The Lunatic Fringe
Member since Dec 2010
6506 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Oil demand growth is not set to peak until the end of this decade at the earliest and Forrest said carbon capture was not a viable solution

Peak oil production and demand has been predicted many times by various esteemed business and scientific experts. In fact there was a famous web site on the topic in the 2000’s followed by many oil industry people that predicted IIRC the mid 2010’s.

Then the shale oil boom hit and blew it to bits.

No one knows the answer to this question. Invest in significant nuclear power energy distribution and cut U.S. carbon emissions in half is but one doable example.

But everyone has their own sacred cow which can’t be touched. This guy is just another example.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
8702 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 8:54 pm to
Interesting paper, more differential equations than most. But the real issue is the energy balance which is not covered. The energy balance will always be a loosing proposition
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
32082 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

The idiots who are saying it’s fake and doesn’t work just hate oil and gas companies and are pushing an agenda.


I love the oil and gas industry and I’m saying it’s fake as an applicable solution (to a fake problem) It may work in theory.

Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10283 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 9:57 pm to
The whole thing is a huge lie.
Posted by tigersmanager
Member since Jun 2010
8176 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 10:08 pm to
He's right
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133326 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 10:21 pm to
The strong nuclear force releases enough energy to lift 5620 pounds between just two protons. We have the technology to use that energy safely and it’s carbon free. It’s proven technology. Use it.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133326 posts
Posted on 2/16/24 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

One of many papers on the topic



I’ve done some back of the napkin economics on the sequestration of CO2 via a solution of calcium hydroxide to precipitate calcium carbonate, and thus sequester the co2. Its cost prohibitive unless you have an almost free source of calcium hydroxide.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram