Started By
Message

re: Burbank Bottomland Property and the Dwarf Palmetto

Posted on 7/6/16 at 8:05 am to
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
60766 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 8:05 am to
Don't buy or build anything west of Highland Road.
Posted by JoePepitone
Waffle House #1494
Member since Feb 2014
11437 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 8:14 am to
An old timer with the Corps of Engineers told me to have the elevation of your home's foundation equal to or higher than the elevation of the nearest railroad tracks.
Posted by Emteein
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
3962 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 9:15 am to
An old timer once told me to see if pines grew on the land. If there are pines that are tall and have thick trunks it never floods because the pines can't survive too wet of conditions.
Posted by JoePepitone
Waffle House #1494
Member since Feb 2014
11437 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 9:23 am to
Yup - I've also heard all my life to avoid home sites where cypress trees grow naturally.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 9:27 am to
quote:


The vast majority of these poorly constructed, shoddy POS complexes will be Section 8 in less than a decade and South Baton Rouge will be the new North Baton Rouge.


It's a shame. A few of my favorite homes right there now have their backyards looking at some shitty cookie cutter neighborhood.

My favorite house high on the turn close to my place is now ruined
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
69248 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 9:28 am to
That's always a safe bet.

The tracks ain't going under water.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 9:36 am to
Your old timer was lying to you
Posted by mack the knife
EBR
Member since Oct 2012
4238 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 9:41 am to
quote:

hard working developers obtained the appropriate permits from the Corps and DNR, and mitigated all the wetlands they destroyed


no way around it. the usace lands on us with both feet if you don't follow the rules (PAINFUL personal experience!). the permit is issued by the usace but the rules/regs are developed by the epa under the clean water act mandate they are bound to follow. ebr city-parish development review group has a "check" in place now to make sure that all necessary communication has taken place with the usace in an effort to save us local developers/builders from "oops" situation
Posted by Grit-Eating Shin
You're an Idiot
Member since May 2013
8503 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 11:43 am to
quote:

I'm sure that all these honest, hard working developers obtained the appropriate permits from the Corps and DNR, and mitigated all the wetlands they destroyed.
You realized that they have to obtain a Corp permit to build in these areas, right? They can't get a building permit without it, and therefore could never get occupancy. Obtaining a Corp permit requires that you either pay out the arse or mitigate.

And the reason the developed areas don't flood is because they are built-up. New buildings are required to be a minimum of 1' above the base flood elevation.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram