- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM leader rides scooter thru vigil for Charlie Kirk last night shouting "f Charlie Kirk
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:28 am to LSUtoBOOT
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:28 am to LSUtoBOOT
quote:
Because many of them have nothing to live for. They’re empty vessels.
I would add that their vessel is filled to the brim with hate.
This... there is no such thing as an "empty" vessel because nature cannot tolerate a vacuum... if its not filled with the right things then its filled with the wrong things...
0
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:38 am to SemperFiDawg
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:39 am to SuperSaint
quote:
none of it should make anyone happy… there is plenty to be pissed off about. But completely fabricating a headline to drum up extra rage is retarded shite leftist do and should be called out every time it happens
100% this. During this last pendulum swing, right-leaning people correctly pushed back against those that supposedly espoused tolerance and free speech virtues and called them out for practicing those tenets only on those with whom they agree. Many of those same people are now calling for blood. The hypocrisy could not be any clearer.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:41 am to facher08
Counterpoint:
Should the right care about hypocrisy? We've tried neutrality, and this is the result. If you create a level playing field of sorts, and you more or less play in accordance with the rules and your opponent absolutely does not, you're losing. It's just a matter of how quickly.
Should the right care about hypocrisy? We've tried neutrality, and this is the result. If you create a level playing field of sorts, and you more or less play in accordance with the rules and your opponent absolutely does not, you're losing. It's just a matter of how quickly.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:44 am to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
Would be wonderful if we started holding up their official positions to the heads of the hundreds of companies that gave them money for their grift and asking if that's what they believe and support.
This is the way
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:49 am to SuperSaint
We are talking about a black guy happy about this. The house bet would be he is a legit anti-White racist. You may not like it, but can’t hide it. No matter how much you’d want to.
Stop covering up for this garbage.
Stop covering up for this garbage.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:50 am to SemperFiDawg
And he wasn’t shot and killed. Exhibit A-for the lunatic left on how you disagree with someone’s views and you don’t kill them. Exhibit B- no riots today destroying others property bc we are upset. And finally, Exhibit C- conservatives across the country went to work today as we do every day. The distinction between good and evil is very clear.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:50 am to SemperFiDawg
Would rather him go to the morgue than the hospital.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:52 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Should the right care about hypocrisy?
The trans folks think killing kids is justified. They think someone who recites basic biology is preaching violence. The right should care about defending themselves from a demographic of freaks and authoritarians who want to scare the populace into accepting their delusion as facts.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:55 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Looks like he got some of the beat down he deserved.
He might have rode in on a scooter but he should have been carried out in an ambulance.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:03 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Should the right care about hypocrisy? We've tried neutrality, and this is the result.
Absolutely, but forget the right/left dichotomy. Avoiding hypocrisy is critical for uphold a person's individual integrity.
quote:
If you create a level playing field of sorts, and you more or less play in accordance with the rules and your opponent absolutely does not, you're losing. It's just a matter of how quickly.
Are we still only talking about speech, or something more? If we're talking about speech, I don't think standing on principle is losing at all. We can see evidence of this with postmodern nonsense beginning to fall out of favor. It obviously isn't going to be a clean and immediate break. Yesterday is a clear example of that, but I don't think the answer is to burn it all down and fight fire with fire.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:05 am to SludgeFactory
What's their official twitter account?
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:08 am to HagaDaga
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 10:12 am
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:14 am to facher08
quote:
Absolutely, but forget the right/left dichotomy. Avoiding hypocrisy is critical for uphold a person's individual integrity.
Fair, but so much of what comes up in this discussion doesn't hinge on actual hypocrisy. I should have said "allegations of hypocrisy."
It's hypocritical to advocate for the marketplace of ideas and then claim the left shouldn't be allowed to speak. It's not hypocritical to say that speech reflecting my ideology should be allowed but speech outside of it should not. It's illiberal, but it's not hypocritical.
quote:
Are we still only talking about speech, or something more? If we're talking about speech, I don't think standing on principle is losing at all. We can see evidence of this with postmodern nonsense beginning to fall out of favor. It obviously isn't going to be a clean and immediate break. Yesterday is a clear example of that, but I don't think the answer is to burn it all down and fight fire with fire.
We're probably talking about the liberal order as a whole. To me, liberalism is a method, not an ideology in and of itself. Which is probably where I diverge from a lot of Republicans and centrists. I like liberalism as a concept and believe it's allowed a certain degree of flourishing, but it's not a guiding belief set for me. And its effectiveness is being eroded by allowing people who are illiberal to enjoy its benefits while abusing those who uphold it, raising questions among the right as to its continuing utility.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:17 am to RicoSuave2025
quote:
And he wasn’t shot and killed. Exhibit A-for the lunatic left on how you disagree with someone’s views and you don’t kill them.
I get what you're saying, but in this very thread, there's multiple people cheering on violence for the guy.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:26 am to QJenk
Hardly an argument. One person is dead for his views and one is not. If you don’t see that difference you are on the side of evil.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:32 am to RicoSuave2025
quote:
Hardly an argument. One person is dead for his views and one is not. If you don’t see that difference you are on the side of evil.
When you cheer on someone being beaten to the point of needing hospitalization, do you not think that can result in someone dying?
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:50 am to Pettifogger
quote:
It's not hypocritical to say that speech reflecting my ideology should be allowed but speech outside of it should not. It's illiberal, but it's not hypocritical.
Fair enough. I'd say only allowing or speech reflecting one's own views is not in the best interest of building any sort of societal understanding, and the unwillingness or incapability to steelman opposing viewpoints is becoming an unhealthy issue.
quote:
I like liberalism as a concept and believe it's allowed a certain degree of flourishing, but it's not a guiding belief set for me. And its effectiveness is being eroded by allowing people who are illiberal to enjoy its benefits while abusing those who uphold it
No argument here.
quote:
raising questions among the right as to its continuing utility.
It's been hijacked, basterdized, or outright ignored by leftists to the point where it isn't recognizable to its original form. For this reason, I see the liberalism of Locke and Smith as something completely different than what has manifested more recently.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:50 am to KyleOrtonsMustache
It literally took like 5 seconds to find him on the BLM Grassroots of Idaho page.
He was also convicted in 2021 of defacing an Abraham Lincoln statue in Boise.
He was also convicted in 2021 of defacing an Abraham Lincoln statue in Boise.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 10:59 am to SemperFiDawg
They should have let the crowd finish....save on the paperwork
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News