Started By
Message

re: Because of Quarantine, fewer Americans died 1st week of March 2020 than 2019 (all causes)

Posted on 3/30/20 at 2:25 am to
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
79624 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 2:25 am to
quote:

You cannot admit you used a grossly incorrect description for time frame of data
I used what was in a tweet, and virtually everyone knew what the post meant

You are just whining, at this point

quote:

You don't care to verify data in your post
I posted the tweet and the graphics.

You looked into it further to discover what was already in the tweet thread. Bully for you.

quote:

still just want to defend "quarantine"
By saying I got it from a retweet. Your idea of a "defense" is odd.

quote:

educate me on its usage
Where did I educate you on it's usage?

I offered to educate you on my motives for what I post, as you were speculating wildly.

The contents I am replying to is FURTHER evidence of you speculating WILDLY regarding my motives.

quote:

It's been entertaining during the "quarantine" whether you are trolling or just a fool.
Neither.

I am entertained by you attributing dozens of motives to me, due to the fact you can't let a little thing go.

I won't change the thread title, because I am hoping you keep melting down over it.

Gives me something to do.

Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
4103 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 5:24 am to
I don’t know about you all but I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees.
Posted by Smittywerbenjagerman
Member since Mar 2020
17 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 6:59 pm to
A thousand people die of heart disease everyday and no one bats an eye
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
8349 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 7:58 pm to
Data has been pulled/tweet deleted. Whether or not it ends up reposted exactly the same the questionable state complete %s using state by state view should have been verified first.

quote:

The figure has been redacted because the reliability of the CDC Weekly Total National Deaths (gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/…) due to lagged reporting even when they report ">100%" in %Complete. The results may no longer be valid.

quote:

It has come to our attention that the CDC data suffers from under reporting for weeks even months after the data is posted with “>100%” reporting. We deleted the original tweet which contained this figure for that reason. The result may not be reliable, as the CDC updates

https://twitter.com/sidsanghi/status/1244674991662260227?s=21


Some people fix their mistakes, and some melt trying to defend theirs.


This post was edited on 3/30/20 at 8:07 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
79624 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 11:23 pm to
What mistake did I make?

What did i defend?



dallastigers Melt: Day 2
This post was edited on 3/30/20 at 11:24 pm
Posted by pensacola
pensacola
Member since Sep 2005
4738 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 12:02 am to
I would expect the Covid+Syphilis numbers for 2020 will be less than those numbers for 2019 at the Villages.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
79624 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 7:34 am to
I just read an article that said, of the 600 people tested for COVID-19, zero came back positive

LINK

ETA: Just read further. It says 600 asymptomatic people.

Don't want to be accused of "making a mistake" and "defending it"

ETA2: Numbers are subject to change with changing and/or new, previously unaccounted for data. Numbers are not my own. Claims are not my own. I defend nothing, and only am sharing a link.

Everyone cool now?
This post was edited on 3/31/20 at 7:38 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram