- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Baton Rouge court case involving marijuana stuffed in a salmon headed to SCOTUS
Posted on 6/11/16 at 5:30 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Posted on 6/11/16 at 5:30 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Fool consented? Lol
1
Posted on 6/11/16 at 5:33 pm to bayourougebengal
I get what you are saying because I don't drink much, take perceptions or even smoke weed anymore but just imagine if weed was legal.
Not only could these worthless cops have been re assigned to an actually preventing crime. All the time spent on this court case would be given back and not wasted. And by the way you are paying for all this shite. And idk about you but I would rather not pay cops to do that or waste all this money on the trail in the courts. i would like some better roads and infrastructure.
Not only could these worthless cops have been re assigned to an actually preventing crime. All the time spent on this court case would be given back and not wasted. And by the way you are paying for all this shite. And idk about you but I would rather not pay cops to do that or waste all this money on the trail in the courts. i would like some better roads and infrastructure.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 6:38 pm to MLSter
Probably ordered it off black market. They probably illegally snooped around his online activity and found the address he was sending to. They then made up this completely bullshite story about their hunch that 6 pounds of weed was in the package. All because it came from Oakland and not from an authorized shipping location.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 6:56 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
Fool consented? Lol
The cops say he consented. Doesn't mean he really did.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 6:57 pm to biglego
Fair enough
Posted on 6/11/16 at 7:22 pm to GeeOH
That was done by enforcement assigned to the center. Nothing random about it, they are there looking for narcotics. FedEx has a reputation of being used by dealers both for drugs and money. The overnight turnaround was explained as the reason.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:03 pm to SabiDojo
I wish it was law that any consent to search must be in writing or recorded.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:26 pm to nc14
So the motion to suppress probably came from the fact that they had no authority to actually open the vacuum packed fish. Giving the ok to search, does not give them the ok to tear shot open....that would be my guess.
Example....yes officer, you can search my car. But without further proof (drug dogs, etc), you can't slash my tires looking in them. I guess that takes probable cause
Example....yes officer, you can search my car. But without further proof (drug dogs, etc), you can't slash my tires looking in them. I guess that takes probable cause
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:27 pm to Barf
quote:
'm amazed that people will give police permission to search. It never makes sense to grant permission to search without a warrant. You have absolutely nothing to gain from the search.
It makes sense. I mean look what happened to the kid that got tazed for 23 seconds and went into cardiac before getting body slammed on his face. He had no legal reason to comply and look where that got him.
Is it worth the risk of getting severely hurt or killed to not cooperate with every directive the officer makes? Standing up for your rights has consequences in this country- jail, broken teeth, a hospital stay and maybe death.
I am not terribly surprised he consented.
Eta- allegedly consented.
This post was edited on 6/11/16 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:28 pm to biglego
quote:
The cops say he consented
I wish this would get emphasized more often.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:29 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Dumbass shite.
Not you, op, the cops, courts, all that shite.
Not you, op, the cops, courts, all that shite.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:31 pm to tiderider
quote:
stopped him at a rc ...
I wonder if it was sockeye salmon.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:33 pm to Negative Nomad
quote:
Kind of loose your rights when you consent, even after the police lie to you.
Show me proof he consented without duress and I might believe you.
That's aside from the fact that this whole operation is a huge waste of resources.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:33 pm to GeeOH
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:35 pm to NYNolaguy1
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:35 pm to GeeOH
I responded to someone questioning actions at FedEx center.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:36 pm to Negative Nomad
quote:
Consent to search" apparently you don't understand that concept.
I can think of a bunch of ways that even with "consent" that it's still an illegal search.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:39 pm to Negative Nomad
quote:
You usually sign a form for the consent.
Ok. So if the police told him he was going to prison if he didn't sign it, would that still make it legal? What if they threatened to seize his car/bank account if he didn't sign? What if he gave consent to search one part of his car and the cops searched beyond it? What if he signed it, then withdrew his consent after, yet they still searched anyway?
A signature doesn't mean much.
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:40 pm to nc14
I don't think they happened to see it. I think someone called them and said "x" address has sent a package and it's going here.
It's like a car being stopped in I10 for a lane change violations and having 10 kilos of coke....
It's like a car being stopped in I10 for a lane change violations and having 10 kilos of coke....
Posted on 6/11/16 at 8:45 pm to GeeOH
Gotcha 
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News