- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Australian wild fires
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:12 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:12 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
That means there is government intervention.
2
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:14 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
That means there is government intervention.
I know what it means.
You just aren’t making the point you think you are.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:14 pm to fightin tigers
Lol now you're getting clowned on by everyone but Locuck
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:14 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
I was answering your question.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:16 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
was answering your question.
Poorly, but then you agree that green energy is not a viable free market solution to climate change issue, yes?
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:16 pm to Strannix
lol such a boomer. no wit or substance every time. you need help attaching a PDF to an email or anything?
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:18 pm to Leauxgan
quote:Oh the irony
no wit or substance every time
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:19 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Poorly, but then you agree that green energy is not a viable free market solution to climate change issue, yes?
I really think it has been brought to a point where it is nearly as viable long term as traditional methods.
Government intervention, at times, is holding back green energy solutions.
Granted, without government intervention traditional methods might he much cheaper as well.
It is really a hypothetical when talking about a free market situation. Which is why holding green energy to that level I view as a hurdle.
This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:23 pm to fightin tigers
Got it. I was right originally. You fail to grasp what the free market is and really fail to grasp GeauxxxTiger23’s point.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:24 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Government intervention, at times, is holding back green energy solutions.
Except one wouldn't exist without massive subsidization, that's laughable mate.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:26 pm to Strannix
quote:
Except one wouldn't exist without massive subsidization, that's laughable mate.
I think traditional methods would still exist if they hadn't received subsidies for the last 150 years.
This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:26 pm to Strannix
quote:
Except one wouldn't exist without massive subsidization, that's laughable mate.
It’s funny. He’s trying to use green energy as a gotcha against GeauxxxTiger23’s post.
The elephant in the room though is that green energy is not a viable solution without massive government intervention, and the solution needed to “fix” climate change would require a complete government overhaul of our entire energy system worldwide.
Yet we are the ones putting an “impossible hurdle” in the way, per his words
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:27 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
The elephant in the room though is that green energy is not a viable solution without massive government intervention, and the solution needed to “fix” climate change would require a complete government overhaul of our entire energy system worldwide.
Your view of green energy is only to combat climate change. That isn't mine.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:30 pm to fightin tigers
I think everyone in this thread is just beginning to grasp how low IQ and or ignorant you are.
Sad
Sad
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:30 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Your view of green energy is only to combat climate change. That isn't mine.
No, no it isn’t.
You were the one that presented it as a free market solution to fight climate change. Stop trying to play word games.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:31 pm to Leauxgan
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:31 pm to fightin tigers
quote:Why do you assume that’s his view? Personally I don’t think green energy is even going to put a dent in climate change but I do view it as potentially cheaper and more convenient energy source.
Your view of green energy is only to combat climate change. That isn't mine.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:33 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Why do you assume that’s his view? Personally I don’t think green energy is even going to put a dent in climate change but I do view it as potentially cheaper and more convenient energy source.
Because his comprehension of other’s views are as bad as his comprehension of the free market.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:35 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Why do you assume that’s his view?
I was probably assuming since I feel most believe it is seen that way.
Of those that believe climate change is being exacerbated by humans.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:37 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
I was probably assuming since I feel most believe it is seen that way.
You probably assumed it because you used this as you said this:
quote:
So, you now agree that green energy is a free market solution to climate change
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News