- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

As downstream parishes watch, Corps reanalyzes expected impact of EBR drainage plan
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:09 am
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:09 am
quote:
As downstream parishes watch, Corps reanalyzes expected impact of Baton Rouge drainage plan
The Advocate
Neighboring parishes downstream from Baton Rouge have cast a wary eye on a $255 million Army Corps of Engineers project to clear out East Baton Rouge's waterways using federal dollars coming to the region after the August 2016 flood.
Birthed after the 1983 flood but stalled for decades, the clearing and dredging plan passed an important milestone when authorities with the city-parish, Central, state and federal government announced this month that they'd found a way to finance a critical $65.6 million match.
quote:
The project calls for clearing, dredging and widening 66 miles of creeks and bayous in East Baton Rouge Parish. The Corps had recommended the project as feasible in July 1995 after more than a decade of study, but without money then to make it a reality.
The work on Beaver and Blackwater bayous in the Central area and on Bayou Fountain and Jones and Ward creeks and their tributaries in the southern part of the parish is aimed at allowing water to move more quickly downstream into the Amite River and Bayou Manchac.
About 17 miles of those waterways would also be lined with concrete, a measure aimed at controlling erosion and speeding the flow of water.
quote:
City-parish officials say they should be able to take advantage of an opportunity to reduce flood risk in East Baton Rouge as other parishes have but have promised to mitigate any impact downstream, possibly with regional retention areas to hold back some runoff and release it slowly.
quote:
Teri Casso, chairwoman of the Ascension Parish Council, said officials in her parish want to work with East Baton Rouge, too. But, she said, they have concerns about whether the low-lying Bluff Swamp and the Spanish Lake basin, potentially huge, natural flood storage areas, will be recommended as retention options.
If they are, Casso said, a lot of conversations will have to take place about how such a plan would affect her constituents who live in the swamp and possible compensation for their property.
"It would be complicated. My constituents love where they live," she said.
^^Some of them live in a swamp and need to be relocated.
Since the diversion canal will lower levels in the Comite basin, there is an opportunity to improve the drainage in Central and northern Baton Rouge along with downstream communities in EBR, Livingston, and Ascension.
quote:
Last year, Livingston Parish sued Ascension Parish, the Pontchartrain Levee District and the state Department of Natural Resources over Ascension's long-standing plans to extend the Laurel Ridge Levee along the southeastern edge of Amite River Basin in the St. Amant and Lake areas.
The two parishes reached a truce earlier this year to allow engineering work to continue, but officials disagree whether a proposed mitigation project tied to the levee would do enough to protect lower Livingston from worsened flooding expected from the levee extension.
The Corps is also taking a second look at the Darlington Reservoir, a once-dead idea to build a large storage area along the Amite River in St. Helena and East Feliciana parishes to cut flooding in parishes on the lower river.
The Darlington Reservoir should be pushed very hard - and construction needs to be much faster than the diversion canal. That, in conjunction with the diversion canal that's finally under construction, should be a huge help in dealing with flood waters in the Amite River basin.
The Darlington Reservoir will help everyone breath a bit easier - especially in the circumstances that lead to the 2016 flood.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:15 am to member12
Y'all got anymore of them studies?
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:18 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Y'all got anymore of them studies?
I support studying the impacts that drainage projects have - but in this case we are "re-studying".
Build the damn reservoir and dredge the damn the canals.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:23 am to member12
Newsflash: Water will run downhill. Maybe don't live IN Spanish Lake.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:24 am to member12
I'm in 100% favor of a very large Darlington Reservoir as opposed to lining the channels up with 17 miles of Cement which will cut off the swamp overflow.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:25 am to MrLSU
quote:
as opposed to lining the channels up with 17 miles of Cement which will cut off the swamp overflow.
Looks like the cement lining is going to be in developed areas. Maybe I'm reading the map incorrectly.
Any idea why Darlington was snowballed back in the 1980s?
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:28 am to member12
quote:
Looks like the cement lining is going to be in developed areas. Maybe I'm reading the map incorrectly.
Any idea why Darlington was snowballed back in the 1980s?
Toledo Bend and Ross Barnett didn't want the bass fishing competition!
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:29 am to member12
quote:
aimed at allowing water to move more quickly downstream into the Amite River and Bayou Manchac
I see engineers haven't learned their lesson about this. It's a horribly outdated mindset. You're much better off capturing the water where it falls rather than making it runoff quicker.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:31 am to BottomlandBrew
quote:
You're much better off capturing the water where it falls rather than making it runoff quicker.
That’s true, but they also have a responsibility to keep drainage bayous clear of debris.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:32 am to BottomlandBrew
Yep. Concrete has always been the answer but retention plays a large role.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:33 am to BottomlandBrew
Actually, it’s best to have the flexibility to do either/or depending on the situation. The Amite is heavily influenced by tides and storm surge and its tributaries are prone to backwater flooding as a result. The Mississippi River is prone to annual spring floods, and the same is true for its tributaries. Thus, you want a system that can send water different places depending on the circumstances. If the Mississippi is low, but the lower Amite is high and the upper Amite is high, you want to be able to send water to the Mississippi. If the lower Amite is low, but the upper Amite is high, you want to move runoff quickly down the Amite. If the lower Amite is high, but the upper Amite is low, you want to let the water collect where it falls and then drain it gradually. If the Mississippi is high and the lower Amite is high, and the upper Amite is high, then we’re all gonna die no matter what, but it helps to have some reservoirs to dump excess capacity in until conditions improve.
This post was edited on 9/3/19 at 11:34 am
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:35 am to member12
quote:
Birthed after the 1983 flood but stalled for decades
Sounds about right for Baton Rouge
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:35 am to kingbob
quote:
Actually, it’s best to have the flexibility to do either/or depending on the situation. The Amite is heavily influenced by tides and storm surge and its tributaries are prone to backwater flooding as a result.
If they keep building levees around LaPlace and other areas, storm surge will eventually find its way into lower Livingston and Ascension.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:37 am to member12
quote:
f they keep building levees around LaPlace and other areas, storm surge will eventually find its way into lower Livingston and Ascension.
It already does. Storm surge backs up into Lake Maurepas and backs up the Amite and Black Bayou since allways.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:38 am to BottomlandBrew
quote:
quote:
aimed at allowing water to move more quickly downstream into the Amite River and Bayou Manchac
I see engineers haven't learned their lesson about this. It's a horribly outdated mindset. You're much better off capturing the water where it falls rather than making it runoff quicker.
You are 100% correct. The sediment will deposit further downstream which will cause a backwater effect in several years due to the mouths of these water ways being clogged up with sand/sediment thanks to the high speed waterways this project will create. You either build the reservoir or you are doomed to repeat the same foolishness only this time the backwater flooding will be 1000xs worse because the mouths of these waterways will full of new sediment deposits.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:46 am to MrLSU
I think the Darlington reservoir has enormous potential as a flood management approach and if done right, to become a top notch recreation area. Boating, fishing, lake cabins, etc
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:47 am to RonLaFlamme
quote:
I think the Darlington reservoir has enormous potential as a flood management approach and if done right, to become a top notch recreation area. Boating, fishing, lake cabins, etc
The right people need to buy land in the area first.
Posted on 9/3/19 at 11:59 am to member12
quote:yep
I think the Darlington reservoir has enormous potential as a flood management approach and if done right, to become a top notch recreation area. Boating, fishing, lake cabins, etc
The right people need to buy land in the area first.
Popular
Back to top
5









