- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AP Admits Alex Jones Trial Was Just For ‘Show’ And Will Soon Be Thrown Out
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:10 am to TigerDoc
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:10 am to TigerDoc
The irony here is your assumption that I'm posting this as an Alex Jones apologist. I really don't care about Alex Jones. I just posted it because I though it would garner some interest.
2
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:12 am to GumboPot
I don't think you're an Alex Jones apologist.
I think you're a troll with terrible epistemics.
I think you're a troll with terrible epistemics.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:16 am to TigerDoc
quote:
I think you're a troll with terrible epistemics.
But when I make an assertion based on logic, even if speculative, all you do is ad hom or attack me or the person. Why not engage with a counter point?
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:17 am to GumboPot
It would have been helpful if "the the the" article linked to the AP story
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:17 am to GumboPot
Because it's pointless to do that with trolls and you're a troll.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:19 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
It would have been helpful if "the the the" article linked to the AP story
What inference do you draw there about the likelihood of the existence of the story saying what Gumboman's article says it does?
This post was edited on 12/13/22 at 11:21 am
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:22 am to GumboPot
quote:
I just posted it because I though it would garner some interest.
Can you shed light on why the thread title that you wrote is a complete fabrication?
Do you work for CNN?
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:22 am to TigerDoc
You are so mad at me. 
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:23 am to GumboPot
Which one? Hasn’t he had multiple trial lately?
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:25 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Can you shed light on why the thread title that you wrote is a complete fabrication?
It was the title of the article I posted:
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:26 am to JohnnyKilroy
not to mention the news link he posted doesn't link to the supposed AP source, only infowars
and the infowars AP "source" is an entertainment lawyer stating his opinion.
my god, these are the people who cry fake news all the time willingly sharing fabricated news.
and the infowars AP "source" is an entertainment lawyer stating his opinion.
my god, these are the people who cry fake news all the time willingly sharing fabricated news.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:26 am to danilo
He has and the piece doesn't specify but mentions the bigger judgement, so it seems to be the Connecticut one. But that's a good point, and he still has another trial in March.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:27 am to TigerDoc
quote:
What inference do you draw there about the likelihood of the existence of the story saying what Gumboman's article says it does?
Now when you put it that way.....
The framing of the title of the thread is laughable, "AP Admits" as if the they are an adverse party to Alex Jones in this case and are guarding information.
From the article
quote:
According to a recent report by the Associated Press
quote:
Attorney Tre Lovell told the AP on Sunday that Jones has “significant issues” he can present on appeal
A quick search of the AP website would show you that the last article mentioning Alex Jones was on 12/2/22.....
LINK-AP
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:31 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Can you shed light on why the thread title that you wrote is a complete fabrication?
Another aspect of troll-prop takes advantage of the fact that most people don't read past the headline, so it's optimized for evoking emotion (and getting likes/clicks/shares/retweets), even when the story doesn't support it.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:31 am to TH03
quote:
not to mention the news link he posted doesn't link to the supposed AP source, only infowars and the infowars AP "source" is an entertainment lawyer stating his opinion. my god, these are the people who cry fake news all the time willingly sharing fabricated news.
I’m pretty sure this isn’t the first time for op either.
Gumbopot and OML consistently post misleading or outright fake articles and try to pass them off as real. shite is hilarious.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 11:38 am to GumboPot
quote:Why do idiots always try to frame thread titles this way. It’s a huge red flag that the substance of the article didn’t actually say what the thread title does.
AP Admits
ETA: i see this has been addressed already. Carry on
This post was edited on 12/13/22 at 11:40 am
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:12 pm to Demshoes
quote:
Defamation is an intentional tort. So there's that.
Is it?
For clarification...Who again was "defamed"? And to what damaging degree? By what claim? (was the claim ever proven either way?)
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:17 pm to GumboPot
quote:
But when I make an assertion based on logic, even if speculative, all you do is ad hom or attack me or the person. Why not engage with a counter point?
Most of the time your logic is skewed by the limitations on your education, as with everything you wrote about immunology, which was painful to read.
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:18 pm to Liberator
ETA: correcting an error about the judgement - Jones defaulted with respected to the defamation (I had thought the jury confirmed defamation. Thanks, WDE.)
This post was edited on 12/13/22 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 12/13/22 at 12:20 pm to TigerDoc
quote:I don’t think it ever got to this point. My memory is that there was never a judgment on the merits of the case because, after repeated warnings and instructions from the court to provide meaningful discovery responses, Jones refused to participate and was defaulted.
the Jury found the Jones defamed the parents by lying about their slaughtered children being crisis actors
Jurors only determined damages.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News