- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: American Citizens: U.S. Border Agents Can Search Your Cellphone
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:42 pm to upgrayedd
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:42 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Then why do they need to look at my phone?
everything is recorded but not looked at, at that moment.
NSA has everything on you. just no person may have viewed it yet.
what yall hiding?
1
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:43 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
that supposed to prove they don't need a warrant?
If they hold you down after you tell them no, do you think they got a warrant?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:44 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
everything is recorded but not looked at, at that moment.
NSA has everything on you. just no person may have viewed it yet.
what yall hiding?
Ok, so use that route and stop hassling me for my phone.
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:44 pm to Napoleon
quote:
that's got to suck entering that password everytime you want to snap a pic.
For pics not so much. Not a big photo taker. To get in the fricking phone, hell yes it does. Makes checking your phone while taking a piss difficult
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:45 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Within seconds, he was surrounded: one man held his legs, another squeezed his throat from behind. A third reached into his pocket, pulling out his
OMG, this is so hot....
Carol?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:45 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Ok, so use that route and stop hassling me for my phone.
im not personally asking
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:45 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Views that he has a constitutional right to hold. That doesn't not mean he deserves to be choked out by a border agent. And it certainly doesn't prove your claim he did something to provoke the agent.
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:45 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
If they hold you down after you tell them no, do you think they got a warrant?
No, they don't.
What are they going to do? Hold me indefinitely until I give them my password?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:47 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
What you hiding baw?
I'll never tell
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:48 pm to TH03
quote:
Views that he has a constitutional right to hold. That doesn't not mean he deserves to be choked out by a border agent. And it certainly doesn't prove your claim he did something to provoke the agent.
this cat only believes in the US constitution when it benefits him and him alone
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:49 pm to drewnbrla
quote:
Good luck. Mine has a alphanumeric password 15+ characters long, touch to unlock disabled and wipes after 10 tries (or remotely- takes one outbound text).
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:50 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
this cat only believes in the US constitution when it benefits him and him alone
The constitution's validity doesn't rely on a particular citizen's belief in it
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:50 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
What are they going to do? Hold me indefinitely until I give them my password?
They'll just break into it after seizing it then use every inch of the phone against you.
Any suspicious bank transactions, texts, social media posts, voicemails, phone calls, photos, notes, emails, web history, political leanings...
In the words of Stalin's #2 guy...
"Show me the man and I will find you his crime"
This post was edited on 3/14/17 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:51 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
this cat only believes in the US constitution when it benefits him and him alone
So that means the first amendment doesn't apply to him?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:51 pm to NYNolaguy1
they ought to just ask the NSA...they already know what's on them
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:52 pm to TH03
quote:
So that means the first amendment doesn't apply to him?
never said that. frankly if this procedure catches criminals whats the harm?
what would you not want them to see?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:53 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:Where do you draw the line on that?
rankly if this procedure catches criminals whats the harm?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:53 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
frankly if this procedure catches criminals whats the harm?
Tell you what- why don't you post your social security #, real name, address and occupation for us, also any relevant bank accounts and credit card #s you frequently use.
It's our job as the collective OT to make sure you're not a danger to yourself.
If you have nothing to hide this won't cause you any trouble. You can trust us.
This post was edited on 3/14/17 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:55 pm to NYNolaguy1
I find myself looking for missing information when any side somehow finds a story that perfectly fits their narrative. It reminds me of the video of the woman freaking out because some bad Trump supporter chased her down until she found a cop. Cop says well he said you stopped your car threatened him and his property and ran off a slew of expletives and obscene gestures in front of his kids. She gets a warning for being a public nuisance then goes on a rant about men, Trump, and how because she's a 120# woman the threats have no bearing to why she was "harassed".
TL/DR: if a one sided story fits a person's narrative and global outlook to a T, chances are they only told half the story.
TL/DR: if a one sided story fits a person's narrative and global outlook to a T, chances are they only told half the story.
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:56 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
never said that. frankly if this procedure catches criminals whats the harm?
You implied it.
We could wrangle everyone up and put them in camps and it would surely catch some criminals. What's the harm? Quite a slippery slope you're trying to go out on.
quote:
what would you not want them to see?
There it is. The old "you got something to hide?" argument.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News