- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/24/15 at 8:53 pm to Fun Bunch
I'd suggest Paris. You still won't have enough time to enjoy all there is to see and do in Paris. Spent 3 weeks there years ago and still did not do everything I wanted to. Second choice would be Rome. I'm into slow travel. I enjoy spending at least a week in one city.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 9:28 pm to wfeliciana
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/24/15 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 7/24/15 at 11:35 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
We have traveled a decent amount but neither of us has been anywhere in Europe.
I was the same. I'd been to lots of places in Asia but never Europe, so I didn't want to plan too much for myself for the first trip. Last month I did 5 nights in Rome, with a very long day trip to Florence and an afternoon trip for a wine tour in Frascati. That was a nice vacation. With hindsight, it would not have been too much to split the time in Florence and Rome, the train was really easy. If that's what you pick, I can suggest a great private tour guide.
quote:
Please, no other cities to muddy the waters.
I love the OT travel threads where someone says they are going to City X, and the advice is to go on a hike 6 hours away and go to this great restaurant an hour and a half away.
This post was edited on 7/24/15 at 11:38 pm
Popular
Back to top

0





