- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 8th Air force last operational loss in WW2
Posted on 5/8/25 at 6:11 am to bmela12
Posted on 5/8/25 at 6:11 am to bmela12
quote:
Thanks! My grandpa was in the 384th Bombardment Group (Heavy) and it would be pretty cool to check it out.
As other's have said, just outside of Savannah, GA. Great, great museum. Well worth the visit.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 6:41 am to FlyingTiger06
quote:
Just like with the entire premise of the need for F-18s in Top Gun: Maverick. Having to do a low-level penetration through that "canyon" and then the ridiculous Laser Guided Bomb (LGB) delivery was completely unnecessary. That mission could have been completed by a single B-2 bomber with the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP).
Of all of the movies ever made, that may have been the dumbest.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 6:44 am to greenbean
quote:
Top Gun: Maverick
quote:
Of all of the movies ever made, that may have been the dumbest


Posted on 5/8/25 at 6:46 am to Lexis Dad
quote:
quote:
Top Gun: Maverick
quote:
Of all of the movies ever made, that may have been the dumbest
There are more holes in the plot than Vandy's secondary. I'm coming from an AF perspective, but I'd assume Navy mission planning would be similar. My questions (and observations):
1. Why not take out the SAM sites with Tomahawks?
2. We had "eyes on" intel of the objective and it was obviously poorly defended, why not just send SOF troops upriver to plant explosives or otherwise sabatoge?
3. Why not plan that mission for either daybreak or dusk? Dusk would give you enough light to navigate the canyon but you'd have the cover of darkness for escape. Daybreak would be the least opposing forces on duty and ready.
4. Why would you not have fighters and SAR in the air to cover their escape and protect the fleet?
5. Who is Hondo and what is his job? 06s don't have personal assistants. I've never been on an active carrier, but I'm assuming everyone on that fight deck is well-trained and well-controlled, so Hondo is just going to get free range of the deck although he is obviously not assigned to the carrier?
6. The "Hard Deck" bar, it is on base? If so, drinking in uniform would be accepted but not getting wild. If that bar is off base, there'd absolutely be no foolish activities in uniform.
7. No matter how decorated a pilot is or who has his back if he disobeys orders and destroys a multimillion-dollar test aircraft, he wouldn't see the light of day again for many years.
8. When Mav flew over the guard shack and dislodged the roof, the Admiral would have been knocked down at the least if not severely injured.
9. Would you land an aircraft with no front landing gear on a carrier? Seems like that would have a lot of potential to greatly damage the ship and flight deck. I understand the ejection seats didn't work, but wouldn't it be better to ditch in the water and have a rescue team from the ship pull Mav and Rooster out?
10. Don't even get me started on the F14 that just happened to be there fueled up, prepped, armed and hooked up to an engine cart. The only case that would happen is if that plane is on alert and if that were the case the crew and guards would be nearby.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 6:46 am to TigerRoyale
quote:
The 8th Army Air Force alone lost more men than the entire United States Marine Corp in WW2.
I saw a graphic a while back that showed over 90% of all USAAC/USAAF/USAF combat deaths were during WW2. My late brother-in-law's dad nearly bled to death bringing a wounded B-24 back to base with the remnants of his copilot all over the cockpit.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 8:05 am to greenbean
quote:
Having to do a low-level penetration through that "canyon" and then the ridiculous Laser Guided Bomb (LGB) delivery was completely unnecessary.
While partially correct, the F-111F’s of the 48th TFW practiced missions exactly like this for many years once they had Pave Tac pods installed into the bomb bays.
Of course they usually lobbed the LGB’s from a distance but the inverted move over mountain ridges was a move they employed many a time to minimize their bounce time over the ridge. Airplanes aerodynamic profile allows for a steeper pull inverted than pushing the stick over forward as they crest a peak.
As for high speed, radar avoidance through canyons they practiced this every day in the Scottish Highlands in anticipation of having to do the same thing through the Urals if the need was ever called for during the Cold War.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 8:30 am to bigjoe1
My grandfather was a tail gunner on a B29 in the 8th. My mom said he never liked to talk about it so she didn't know much. All he said was that he hated English food.
Two years ago, she gave me his medals. Coolest thing I've ever inherited. The wings for the tail gunners had two bullets in them to represent their machine gun. Looks bad arse.
I watched Masters of the Air on Apple. I thought it was really well done. I did not have an appreciation for how scary their job was or the losses they took. In hindsight, being stuck in those bombers in the air seems even scarier than being in combat on the ground.
Correction: B 17
Two years ago, she gave me his medals. Coolest thing I've ever inherited. The wings for the tail gunners had two bullets in them to represent their machine gun. Looks bad arse.
I watched Masters of the Air on Apple. I thought it was really well done. I did not have an appreciation for how scary their job was or the losses they took. In hindsight, being stuck in those bombers in the air seems even scarier than being in combat on the ground.
Correction: B 17
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:44 am to AUTimbo
quote:,
F-111F’s
quote:,
Pave Tac pods
quote:
during the Cold War
Dude, this movie was set in the present, not the 1980s. Like I said, a single B-2 with a single MOP would have accomplished this mission, but there's no theatrics in that.
quote:
Airplanes aerodynamic profile allows for a steeper pull inverted than pushing the stick over forward as they crest a peak.
Very familiar with how aerodynamics work. I'm not questioning the aerodynamics, just the foolishness of needing to do such a mission.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:47 am to FlyingTiger06
quote:
Very familiar with how aerodynamics work. I'm not questioning the aerodynamics, just the foolishness of needing to do such a mission.

I'm probably the worst offender btw

Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:59 am to 777Tiger
quote:
I'm probably the worst offender btw
Get back in line and wait your turn….sir.
:)
If I had a dollar per gripe for every military snafu in the movies I’d be a very rich man.
Loved how the SU-57 in TGM rotates as they pass with it’s semi Cobra maneuver/reversal yet somehow instantaneously closes the gap on a 14 in full burner going the other way.
Who knew a “Felon” had damn near hyper-sonic capability in order to close like that?
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:01 am to AUTimbo
quote:
Loved how the SU-57 in TGM rotates as they pass with it’s semi Cobra maneuver/reversal yet somehow instantaneously closes the gap on a 14 in full burner going the other way.
yep, had to roll my eyes with a silent GTFO of here with that!

Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:36 am to mule74
quote:
My grandfather was a tail gunner on a B29 in the 8th. My mom said he never liked to talk about it so she didn't know much. All he said was that he hated English food.
This was my Dad, Didn't want to talk about it when we were little. His stock answer was, :it was so long ago I've forgotten". As we got older he would answer general questions but he never initiated a conversaton about the war.
Yeah we have his all of his medals and they are really a part of family history.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:06 pm to mule74
quote:
B29 in the 8th
You mean B-17. B-29s were only in the Pacific. My Grandfather was a bombardier on one.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:08 pm to Spaceman Spiff
quote:
B-29s were only in the Pacific
my uncle flew those, he and his crew was an alternate for dropping "the bomb," he flew B-36s after the war
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 2:18 pm to 777Tiger
Awesome! So he was with the 509th Composite Group?
My Grandfather was with the 40th BG, 25th BS.
My Grandfather was with the 40th BG, 25th BS.

Posted on 5/8/25 at 2:39 pm to WeeWee
Is that your uncles pic... awesome
Posted on 5/8/25 at 2:53 pm to WWII Collector
pretty damn cool
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:29 pm to Spaceman Spiff
quote:Me too!
I live about 20 minutes from the Mighty Eighth museum. Need to check this out.
I used to drive by it all the time when I worked at Gulfstream
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:38 pm to Spaceman Spiff
Delete
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:45 pm to FlyingTiger06
I agree with you, however, I'd say that now days the AF prioritizes non pilots and non aircrew members above the flyers. "Shoe clerks" have taken over and fighter pilots with shoe clerk mentality have risen in rank and weakened the AF.
Use to go fly, bomb and come back to beers while debriefing. The bosses would tell you your job was to kill and break things. Now, it's take this course so you don't offend someone, then complete this paperwork and double check your email...
Use to go fly, bomb and come back to beers while debriefing. The bosses would tell you your job was to kill and break things. Now, it's take this course so you don't offend someone, then complete this paperwork and double check your email...
Popular
Back to top
