- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 41% of college students believe hate speech should NOT be protected by the constitution
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:03 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:03 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Just really hammers home how little you know about me
Jesus.
Of course, Scruffy is sorry.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:03 pm to Centinel
And if someone is protesting in a street you feel you should have the right to run them over without penalty?
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:03 pm to RLDSC FAN
So basically every speech not supporting liberal policy will be labeled hate speech.
It’s funny how similar Liberals are to Nazi’s.
It’s funny how similar Liberals are to Nazi’s.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:04 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Of course, Scruffy is sorry.
I mean you make a declaration about me that is completely false and you don’t expect me to point that out?
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:04 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
And if someone is protesting in a street you feel you should have the right to run them over without penalty?
Where did I say this?
One more time: Why does a protester have the right to prohibit me from using a public street?
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:04 pm to Draconian Sanctions
It was a joke you tard
Man you're dense
Man you're dense
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:05 pm to ctiger69
quote:
So basically every speech not supporting liberal policy will be labeled hate speech.
Where are you getting this from?
I literally said, in this thread, I would personally have no issue with an NRA sit in of O’Hare to protest for gun rights.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:06 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
A Democrat governor just signed one of the most restrictive anti-abortion laws in the country
I'd hardly consider JBE a conservative. He's a tax and spend Democrat. Most southern Democrats are likely more conservative than AOC types because they'd never get elected otherwise.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:06 pm to Deactived
quote:
It was a joke
Yeah I don’t buy that, at least in a general sense. Go back to my earlier post and you’ll see several states trying to make it legal to run over protesters. “Just a joke” eh?
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:08 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
I'd hardly consider JBE a conservative.
That’s more a reflection on the Deep South than JBE
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
"Enlightened liberals" as they would like to think themselves are no more than totalitarians. They will destroy the last free Republic. These students are socially engineered to think and act this way.
There is no such thing as "hate speech." Only speech. Some speech one may disagree with, but all speech is protected under amendment 1.
The problem here is that we are rapidly regressing to 1984:
Ignorance is strength. Freedom is slavery. War is peace.
This generation will be the first to embrace newspeak (already happening) and will ultimately progress to report thought-crimes to Big Brother (big push to make this a reality- speech-crime comes first). The surveillance state already exists (in the open, no less....) All the while, the useful idiots are believing and doing only as they are instructed by Minitrue (already exists-- MSM and hollywood agit-propaganda, and already VERY effective). It is coming in a flood now, not a trickle.
Ignoring this shift is dangerous.
There is no such thing as "hate speech." Only speech. Some speech one may disagree with, but all speech is protected under amendment 1.
The problem here is that we are rapidly regressing to 1984:
Ignorance is strength. Freedom is slavery. War is peace.
This generation will be the first to embrace newspeak (already happening) and will ultimately progress to report thought-crimes to Big Brother (big push to make this a reality- speech-crime comes first). The surveillance state already exists (in the open, no less....) All the while, the useful idiots are believing and doing only as they are instructed by Minitrue (already exists-- MSM and hollywood agit-propaganda, and already VERY effective). It is coming in a flood now, not a trickle.
Ignoring this shift is dangerous.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:10 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I mean you make a declaration about me that is completely false and you don’t expect me to point that out?
You’re right.
Based on everything you’ve posted on here in the past, you are clearly either a Libertarian or a Republican, maybe even Green Party.
Not sure how Scruffy could be so confused and would make a comment like that.
This post was edited on 6/1/19 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:11 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Based on everything you’ve posted on here in the past, you are clearly either a Libertarian or a Republican.
Not sure how Scruffy could be so confused and would make a comment like that.
You think there’s only one shade of Libertarianism? I know in America the hard right version is the only one people associate with the word but you know there are others, right?
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:13 pm to DeusVultMachina
quote:
DeusVultMachina
Are you an Alex Jones viewer? Serious question.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:15 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:Oh no, not at all.
You think there’s only one shade of Libertarianism?
There are clearly many shades.
You voted for Gary Johnson last election, right?
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:16 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Are you an Alex Jones viewer? Serious question.
I like how you cannot actually have a rational discussion about the political points made- and instead jump right to a (strange) ad hominem.
This is how I know I have engaged one of the useful idiots.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:16 pm to Scruffy
Yes although that had more to do with Hillary and Trump than Gary
Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:21 pm to Draconian Sanctions
A libertarian that thinks it's acceptable to deny the right of an individual to utilize a public street.

Posted on 6/1/19 at 7:22 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Draconian sanctions (name appropriate):
Define hate speech.
Now define Libertarian.
Me thinks you are not one in reality. I will skip the lecture and instruct you.
Here's a hint: a real Libertarian would not believe such a thing as forbidden speech exists, nor should such a thing be enforceably outlawed.
Useful idiot you are indeed.
Define hate speech.
Now define Libertarian.
Me thinks you are not one in reality. I will skip the lecture and instruct you.
Here's a hint: a real Libertarian would not believe such a thing as forbidden speech exists, nor should such a thing be enforceably outlawed.
Useful idiot you are indeed.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 8:05 pm to RLDSC FAN
The most repugnant and vile speech is exactly the speech that needs protecting, constitutionally speaking.
Popular
Back to top


1






