- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 41% of college students believe hate speech should NOT be protected by the constitution
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:25 pm to Deactived
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:25 pm to Deactived
quote:
No. You shouldn't be able to protest on a major interstate's bridge disrupting traffic and commerce
Why you don't get this I have no idea. Oh wait, I do
Sounds like you only care about freedom of speech as long as you agree with the speech in question
The right can get off their free speech soapbox now
This post was edited on 6/1/19 at 6:26 pm
1
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:29 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
So you want to make manslaughter legal as long as you’re against the protest in question?
If you are blocking one of the busiest interstates in the region to scream at the sky I really don't care if you get run over.
The guy below did nothing wrong imo. Bet they won't do that shite again
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:32 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Street paid for with public funds therefore freedom of speech (protest) must be respected.
You didn't answer my question. Why do they have a right to stop me from utilizing a public street to travel where I wish?
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:32 pm to fallguy_1978
“I don’t like your opinion and choice of expressing that opinion therefore it’s okay to kill you!!!”
-fallguy_1978
The right is a parody of itself
-fallguy_1978
The right is a parody of itself
This post was edited on 6/1/19 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:35 pm to Centinel
quote:
You didn't answer my question
Yes I did
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:36 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Ok, it still doesn’t state what you reported.
Scruffy already posted that he disagrees with a law that criminalizes the “intention”, rather than criminal act.
At the same time, even the LA courts stated that the actions of the O&G companies were both illegal and counter to the law.
As for the people arrested, there is no further info in that article.
Again, it doesn’t state what you are saying.
And that law’s primary sponsor is a Democrat.
Scruffy already posted that he disagrees with a law that criminalizes the “intention”, rather than criminal act.
At the same time, even the LA courts stated that the actions of the O&G companies were both illegal and counter to the law.
quote:
However, co-owners of the land said that the protesters had permission to be there last summer, and it was the pipeline and the companies behind it that were guilty of trespassing. A state court agreed with the landowners in December 2018 and ruled that the pipeline companies indeed trespassed by starting construction without first receiving permission or legally “expropriating” the property under state eminent domain laws. By then, the arrests had already been made
As for the people arrested, there is no further info in that article.
Again, it doesn’t state what you are saying.
And that law’s primary sponsor is a Democrat.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:37 pm to Draconian Sanctions
No, you didn't.
Once again, why does a protester have the right to bar me from utilizing a public street or highway?
Once again, why does a protester have the right to bar me from utilizing a public street or highway?
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:39 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Ok, it still doesn’t state what you reported.
People are being arrested from private land and being charged with the crime. I guess that’s a slight difference from it being enumerated in the law itself but the point is that these are conservatives seeking to chill free speech, something may who post here pretend never happens.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:39 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:That is false, as we are all aware that the simple concept of “public funding” does not result in the freedom to trespass or move within certain areas.
Street paid for with public funds therefore freedom of speech (protest) must be respected.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:39 pm to Centinel
quote:
No, you didn't.
Yes I did. That you didn’t like the answer doesn’t mean I didn’t answer it.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:39 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:Democrat primary sponsor.
these are conservatives
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:40 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Once again, why does a protester have the right to bar me from utilizing a public street or highway?
It's rather telling you won't answer this.
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:40 pm to Centinel
quote:
Once again, why does a protester have the right to bar me from utilizing a public street or highway?
They only do if you agree with their opinion.
I'm sure he'd be just fine with the NRA staging a massive pro gun rally on the runways at O' Hare too
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:41 pm to fallguy_1978
Exactly. Because he's a fricking hypocrite.
He'd be screaming bloody murder if there were a bunch of conservatives blocking the road for a protest.
I just want to rub his face in his own bullshite.
He'd be screaming bloody murder if there were a bunch of conservatives blocking the road for a protest.
I just want to rub his face in his own bullshite.
This post was edited on 6/1/19 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:42 pm to Scruffy
quote:
That is false
No, it’s not:
LINK
quote:
Most scholars trace the lineage of the public forum doctrine to Justice Owen J. Roberts’s opinion in Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization (1939), in which he wrote: “Wherever the title of streets and parks may rest, they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions. Such use of the streets and public places has, from ancient times, been a part of the privileges, immunities, rights, and liberties of citizens.”
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:43 pm to Centinel
quote:
He'd be screaming bloody murder if there were a bunch of conservatives blocking the road for a protest.
What’s your basis for this?
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:44 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
I'm sure he'd be just fine with the NRA staging a massive pro gun rally on the runways at O' Hare too
I absolutely would
Unlike many of you I’m not a shill for my political sports team
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:44 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Sounds like you only care about freedom of speech as long as you agree with the speech in question
Sounds like you
I don't support anyone protesting on the interstate
Ironic talking about soapboxes here
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:44 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
What’s your basis for this?
So you have no issues with protesters blocking you from getting home from work on a public road? Or with protesters blocking emergency vehicles?
Yes or no will suffice.
This post was edited on 6/1/19 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 6/1/19 at 6:44 pm to Centinel
quote:
It's rather telling you won't answer this.
Except I did answer it
This post was edited on 6/1/19 at 6:46 pm
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News