- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2005 NIH Study Shows the Contradiction From Health “Experts”
Posted on 5/6/20 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 6:59 pm
Strange that Fauci must have forgotten he was part of a study in 2005 showing that Chloroquine had very favorable results on Coronaviruses to not only inhibit symptoms but also spread.
LINK
LINK
6
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:01 pm to Hussss
Ok....so what is his endgame? To destroy the economy? Self Aggrandizement? Drive Trump from office and promote socialism and a Social Justice agenda?
What is it?
What is it?
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:05 pm to Hussss
quote:
To not only inhibit symptoms but also spread in monkeys.
FIFY
“ Vero E6 cells (an African green monkey kidney cell line) ”
Any studies in humans?
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:08 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
To not only inhibit symptoms but also spread in monkeys.
2 bans 1 mod inbox
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:11 pm to GAAtty70
My hunch is that a lot of people welcome the supposed pandemic because it's provided an excuse to build the kind of country they were unable to build at the ballot box: a country with an unarmed populace (a work in progress) dependent on government largess, and with a standard and mode of living more compatible with their vision of "stopping climate change."
The latter is less about environmentalism or saving cities in low-lying areas than it is about human extinctionism. Climate change activists, deep down, just really don't like people all that much. Think about it. Al Gore? That Greta chick? We're not talking about the Dale Carnegies of the world here.
The latter is less about environmentalism or saving cities in low-lying areas than it is about human extinctionism. Climate change activists, deep down, just really don't like people all that much. Think about it. Al Gore? That Greta chick? We're not talking about the Dale Carnegies of the world here.
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:12 pm to USMEagles
I am talking Fauci here....what is his endgame?
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:13 pm to Hussss
I’ve thought something was fishy with Fauci from day one.
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:13 pm to GAAtty70
quote:
I am talking Fauci here....what is his endgame?
Well, Fauci is either in agreement with the people I'm talking about, or in bed with them somehow. Or maybe he's just not very smart and is easily influenced. He sure seems that way... doesn't really seem like the kind of guy who has an "endgame."
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 7:14 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:13 pm to Hussss
In vitro study
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:15 pm to Hussss
Well it’s only currently being studied closely in the VERY sick so we would expect to see much effect of a drug that slows the virus down when the damage has already been done.
It’s like saying a speed bump is effective when you put it down after the cars already passed.
It’s like saying a speed bump is effective when you put it down after the cars already passed.
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 7:16 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:25 pm to USMEagles
If he is in bed with those folks, why does Trump keep him around and praise him?
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:29 pm to GAAtty70
quote:
If he is in bed with those folks, why does Trump keep him around and praise him?
Maybe Fauci's good at flattery. Trump doesn't seem like he's the kind of guy who's immune to that.
In any case, I'm not really on board with OP's premise that Fauci really thinks quinones are of value here and is hiding that fact. I just shared my opinion, which is that a lot of people on one end of the political spectrum have responded to Coronavirus with barely-concealed glee.
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:32 pm to Hussss
First, the study you linked showed an effect on cell cultures. It wasn’t a human study. And it was tested on a different virus. Slight genetic variations from one virus to the next can have substantial effects. And when it was recently tried on humans, significant side effects were encountered. That doesn’t happen to a cell culture. Hence, the need for human trials.
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:03 pm to GAAtty70
quote:
What is it?
Fauci has before been accused of a lot of shady things, suppressing medicines from clinics that he didn't have financial interest in, until his owe version could be released seems to be his favorite. I think around 2011 a law was passed allowing people working for clinics getting paid with federal money to patient medicines. However Fauci was doing that before the law was passed.
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:05 pm to Coach Yo
quote:
Hence, the need for human trials.
Want to bet Fauci's vax will not include human trials.
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:06 pm to OLDBEACHCOMBER
What does a New Iberia Haircut have to do with the ‘Rona?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News