Started By
Message

re: 100 years ago today the tank is introduced on the battlefield

Posted on 9/15/16 at 1:21 pm to
Posted by Amazing Moves
Member since Jan 2014
6174 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 1:21 pm to
Or those uranium tank busters.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72225 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Or those uranium tank busters.


DU is pretty much the standard when it comes to AT rounds nowadays.
Posted by Yammie250F
Member since Jul 2010
1013 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 1:49 pm to
Terd, on the graphic of the T-14 you posted.

Why does it say engine replacement at 0.5 Hour?
What does that mean? Is it a typo?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138138 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 1:50 pm to
I wondered about that as well, but I assumed it meant the engine could be swapped in 30 mins. The Abrams is also very modular like that as well it think.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53627 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 2:02 pm to
"Schnuck"! I love it.



Germany didn't have the resources to build more than a few tanks. The blockade really hurt her.

Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72225 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 2:06 pm to
The Abrams is very modular. The engine (or as it's more commonly called the "power pack") is modular and can be changed out quickly. But it does not end there either. Most major components on everything from main gun fire control, communications, drive controls, to turret power functions are likewise modular.

When something goes wrong on just about any system on the tank, a call to BN maint. goes out. He comes out and troubleshoots the problem and 9 times out of 10 the problem can be fixed by simply unplugging one component and plugging in a replacement.

Really the only part of the tank that is still labor and time intensive to repair is the tracks... and those are a BITCH.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53627 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 8:08 pm to
Maintenance on those Great War tanks was almost impossible, and they broke down all of the time.

The Renault 1917 French tank was one of the best to come out of The Great War. They were good enough to perform some services during World War II !
Posted by Sancho Panza
La Habaña, Cuba
Member since Sep 2014
8161 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 8:58 pm to
Still have a scar on one of my fingers from repairing a track.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 8:59 pm to
It is amazing the advancement in tanks from WWI to WWII. Look at those and then contemplate a Blitz Kreig strategy.

Heinz Guegerian was visionary.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Really the only part of the tank that is still labor and time intensive to repair is the tracks... and those are a BITCH.


Well, it usually takes a crew about 5 seconds to repair the tracks that I blow off in WOT.....
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138138 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 9:01 pm to
Watched a doc on USMC guys fresh out of basic being trained to be tankers. They broke a spline one of of the sprockets on one of the drive gears (I'm sure that's not the proper term) and had to take the track of to repair it. It looked brutal.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72225 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

Watched a doc on USMC guys fresh out of basic being trained to be tankers. They broke a spline one of of the sprockets on one of the drive gears (I'm sure that's not the proper term) and had to take the track of to repair it. It looked brutal.


any day you find yourself needing one of this is a bad day....

Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112662 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 9:23 pm to
Can you imagine if 10 M1 Abrams popped up in a WWI battlefield?
This post was edited on 9/15/16 at 9:25 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72225 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Can you imagine if 10 M1 Abrams popped up in a WWI battlefield?


Two things could pose a problem.

1. Barbed wire. If you get enough of it tangled in your tracks, you're dead in the water.

2. The mud in Flanders. In places it had the consistency of watery oatmeal and could be deep enough for something as a big as an Abrams to sink up above the turret ring. Again, you're dead in the water.
Posted by Bushmaster
19th Hole
Member since Oct 2008
39954 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 9:40 pm to
Darth, for as much unwarranted shite you catch on here I really appreciate all of your knowledge on things like this. I was in the first and second gulf wars and have been over a bunch of times since as a PMC and really enjoy insight on aspects of war that I don't know a lot about.
Posted by Sancho Panza
La Habaña, Cuba
Member since Sep 2014
8161 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 9:46 pm to
I've seen a tank stuck up to top of turret level.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72225 posts
Posted on 9/15/16 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

I've seen a tank stuck up to top of turret level.





Time to call in the 88's at that point....



Posted by Sancho Panza
La Habaña, Cuba
Member since Sep 2014
8161 posts
Posted on 9/16/16 at 3:48 am to
Yeah, they had an 88 & 3 other tanks, so far, working the problem when I went by.

No idea what it took to get it out.
Posted by Jobu93
Cypress TX
Member since Sep 2011
21166 posts
Posted on 9/16/16 at 6:44 am to
How does the Israeli tank rank? It has a nice stance to it.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 9/16/16 at 6:52 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/16/16 at 6:52 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram