- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Things the Saints could get in a trade for Ingram?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 10:13 am to The Sad Banana
Posted on 10/22/12 at 10:13 am to The Sad Banana
Naw
Same here in that the o-line has been great the last four games protecting Drew but has flat given up on run blocking for anyone.
Lets hope coach K can find a solution soon.
Same here in that the o-line has been great the last four games protecting Drew but has flat given up on run blocking for anyone.
Lets hope coach K can find a solution soon.
1
Posted on 10/22/12 at 10:16 am to The Sad Banana
quote:
how is this all Ingram's fault?
doesn't need to be all, just needs to be a good bit.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 10:18 am to goatmilker
I wonder how Jed Collins grades out at FB.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 10:18 am to Chad504boy
Judging by the last four weeks would that be a lesser bit than Thomas?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 10:24 am to goatmilker
Rob Ninkovich. I mean he wasn't even good enough to play on OUR defense........
Posted on 10/22/12 at 11:40 am to hg
2.9 yards of salt water taffy.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:01 pm to hg
dirty used kleenex
either boogers or "left over sex juice"
and that is a stretch, dude sucks balls
ya'll still wanna fight when I say BUSTO
either boogers or "left over sex juice"
and that is a stretch, dude sucks balls
ya'll still wanna fight when I say BUSTO
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:02 pm to hg
An empty can of caffeine free diet coke.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:13 pm to stapuffmarshy
Did you look at the last four games rushing for ALL the backs or are you just picking out one guy as the object of your derision?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:18 pm to goatmilker
Im talking about a first round pick who can barely get to the line of scrimmage
keep blowing the dude, he's a dog
keep blowing the dude, he's a dog
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:30 pm to stapuffmarshy
Must suck donkey balls to be you.
You just don't want to address the fact that the Saints have reeked in the last four games running the ball.
I posted Thomas's stats the last 4 weeks.
Whats your excuse for that?
You just don't want to address the fact that the Saints have reeked in the last four games running the ball.
I posted Thomas's stats the last 4 weeks.
Whats your excuse for that?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:31 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
Im talking about a first round pick who can barely get to the line of scrimmage
Actually he gets 2.9 yrds past it consistently.
This post was edited on 10/22/12 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:34 pm to goatmilker
quote:
I posted Thomas's stats the last 4 weeks.
Whats your excuse for that?
Thomas wasn't a first round draft pick.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:34 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Must suck donkey balls to be you.
must it? cause you seem to be the one who is mad
quote:
I posted Thomas's stats the last 4 weeks.
eyeball test:
Ingram doesn't break many if any tackles, one hit and down. No real movement other than straight ahead. Does not seem to have any explosion left.
now post your "stats"
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:35 pm to stapuffmarshy
Yeah, stats are biased.
Eyeball test is the REAL scientific measure.
Eyeball test is the REAL scientific measure.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:38 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
Ingram doesn't break many if any tackles, one hit and down. No real movement other than straight ahead. Does not seem to have any explosion left.
He picks up 2 yrds every time he touches the ball. He is a short yardage back. He isnt the worst guy we could have around.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:39 pm to stapuffmarshy
Don't need stats anymore.
Like you I'll just forget pesky stats and use the classic 'eyeball test'.
No one on the Saints has been able to run the last four games.
But keep on hatin if it makes you warm at nite.
Like you I'll just forget pesky stats and use the classic 'eyeball test'.
No one on the Saints has been able to run the last four games.
But keep on hatin if it makes you warm at nite.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:42 pm to Hoodoo Man
quote:
Yeah, stats are biased.
Eyeball test is the REAL scientific measure.
as a fan I trust myself and my eyes
I don't give a shite what you think in case you didn't know
are we talking about a first round pick for JUST short yardage situations????
pitiful, keep making excuses for the guy. Not a fit, never was going to be a fit. Wasted pick. BUST for the saints....
could give a crap if he could play great elsewhere....it's about here and now
and those runs in the first half that Ingram got zippo on weren't all short yardage situations
but Ingram is great and Shanle sucks, a guy who actually helped win a TROPHY for this organization
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:44 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
but Ingram is great and Shanle sucks, a guy who actually helped win a TROPHY for this organization
Its about this year my friend. Shanle sucks now!
Or as you just put it I think...
quote:
it's about here and now
Hey. You finally got something right!
Posted on 10/22/12 at 12:45 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
but Ingram is great and Shanle sucks
The eyeball test AND the stats suggest Shanle sucks.
What are you doing?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News