- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Saints would be so much better with Chase Daniel and Brees' money spent on
Posted on 9/16/12 at 5:51 pm to GalvoAg
Posted on 9/16/12 at 5:51 pm to GalvoAg
quote:
I really don't see what's so dumb, its totally possible Brees wasn't worth that much.
That's possible. It's not possible that we'd be better off with a mediocre backup with no relevant regular season experience over Drew
0
Posted on 9/16/12 at 5:55 pm to Kingpenm3
quote:
You must not be watching the same game I am. (And last week too)
You realize since Brees joined the Saints in 06 NO ONE ELSE HAS MORE WINS THAN THE SAINTS.. IN THE ENTIRE frickING NFL?
You do realize Brees has lead this offense to the top of the NFL in like 3 of those season and brought and NFL championship to NOLA with a Superbowl MVP.. and never once complained for the fact that he was underpaid the entire time..
Grow up or Get serious. Quit acting like a douche.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 5:57 pm to SouljaBreauxTellEm
not to mention his personal records that he likes to call team records.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 5:57 pm to SouljaBreauxTellEm
You realize you have the Bucks and Panthers in your division right? Not exactly the best teams since 2006
This post was edited on 9/16/12 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 9/16/12 at 5:58 pm to SouljaBreauxTellEm
quote:
You realize since Brees joined the Saints in 06 NO ONE ELSE HAS MORE WINS THAN THE SAINTS.. IN THE ENTIRE frickING NFL?
They probably don't because their fanhood and jerseys are both from the Super Bowl season after the Cowboys game.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 5:58 pm to danman6336
By the way, who are you going to sign that was even available in free agency on the defensive side with that extra money to improve the Saints that much more?
Not worth it.. You build your franchise in the draft.
Not worth it.. You build your franchise in the draft.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 5:59 pm to Kingpenm3
Is the OP really this stupid? What players would want to play for this team if we didn't sign Drew Brees? And what specific players are you wanting to sign? Specific, not position, but specific player? You want Nicks and Meachem back without Drew? What's that get you?
Drew deserved the money he got and this team would be absolute shite without him. Were you even a fan during the Brooks, Billy/Bobby Joes, Wade/Dave Wilsons, Wurffel, Collins years. Pay dat man his money and stop your bitching!
Drew deserved the money he got and this team would be absolute shite without him. Were you even a fan during the Brooks, Billy/Bobby Joes, Wade/Dave Wilsons, Wurffel, Collins years. Pay dat man his money and stop your bitching!
Posted on 9/16/12 at 5:59 pm to GalvoAg
quote:
You realize you have the Buds and Panthers in your division right? Not exactly the best teams since 2006
who gives a shite, the saints have clearly been better under Brees' leadership than at any other point in their history. Unless you think Aaron Brooks or Chase Daniel would have been as efficient in SB XLIV
Posted on 9/16/12 at 6:01 pm to REG861
I was just saying that's its not to hard to rack up wins vs those teams
Posted on 9/16/12 at 6:02 pm to REG861
quote:
Unless you think Aaron Brooks or Chase Daniel would have been as efficient in SB XLIV
He wants to sign Jeff Blake to a 1 year, fifteen dollar contract.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 6:32 pm to REG861
Saints have been better under Brees until this year. Saints had to let good players go to sign Brees to his big contract and could not sign good replacements. Brees got his money, now I hope he enjoys passing from his backside with and less that steller offensive line. Henderson hurt, Meacheam gone. Lost a fine offensive lineman who signed elsewhere. I guess the truth hurts.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 7:31 pm to JJT
Do you even know what a salary cap is? If we would have kept Nicks and Meachem, we couldn't have signed Brees. Where would we be then? And Grubbs is a capable replacement. Our tackles are the problem, not the guards. And what does Brees' contract have to do with Henderson being hurt?
Again, somebody tell me what replacement for Brees we would have signed as well as what players we would have signed if we didn't sign Brees. (keeping in mind we signed the best FA linebacker from a division rival) Until you do that, STFU with this nonsense!
Again, somebody tell me what replacement for Brees we would have signed as well as what players we would have signed if we didn't sign Brees. (keeping in mind we signed the best FA linebacker from a division rival) Until you do that, STFU with this nonsense!
Posted on 9/16/12 at 7:44 pm to danman6336
You fricking people are morons. 
Posted on 9/16/12 at 8:03 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
The point is Brees was supposed to be all about team. His contract cost us to be unable to keep and sign players. The other point was is if we could have kept Meacheam the Henderson injury would have a lesser effect. Who do we not have for the deep threat. This is in addition to defense players gone.
This post was edited on 9/16/12 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 9/16/12 at 8:05 pm to JJT
Why didn't the FO know in advance that Henderson would be injured?!
Posted on 9/16/12 at 8:11 pm to Hoodoo Man
That was not the point dillweed. We are left with only one deep threat and he is now injured. Use your gray matter.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 8:16 pm to JJT
Ok dumbass!
Meachem signed for more money with another team...if we would have matched that offer, we would be over the salary cap...unless Brees took the same contract as Sage Rosenfeild (sp?) which wasn't going to happen because the front office put the franchise tag on him which was pretty damn close to what he's making now. So, with the FA tag we couldn't have signed Meachem anyway. Why aren't you possed at Meachem and Nicks for not taking less money to stay with the Saints?
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhj!!!!!!!'n
Meachem signed for more money with another team...if we would have matched that offer, we would be over the salary cap...unless Brees took the same contract as Sage Rosenfeild (sp?) which wasn't going to happen because the front office put the franchise tag on him which was pretty damn close to what he's making now. So, with the FA tag we couldn't have signed Meachem anyway. Why aren't you possed at Meachem and Nicks for not taking less money to stay with the Saints?
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhj!!!!!!!'n
Posted on 9/16/12 at 8:20 pm to Suntiger
Because could have accepted less early on to keep the team together. He could have withstood less money much easier than those players. Less greed by Brees better saints team
Posted on 9/16/12 at 8:28 pm to JJT
So could Evans and Meachem and Porter and Colston and Nicks and every other player. Breed has earned every penny he got...
Not to mention we couldn't have signed Nicks and Meachem anyway, unless he took some kind of contract comparable to Travarius Jackson. We're not talking the difference between a few million dollars. We're talking about them being offered large amounts of money from other teams and us not being able to resign them under the cap regardless of Brees' contract.
Not to mention we couldn't have signed Nicks and Meachem anyway, unless he took some kind of contract comparable to Travarius Jackson. We're not talking the difference between a few million dollars. We're talking about them being offered large amounts of money from other teams and us not being able to resign them under the cap regardless of Brees' contract.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 8:47 pm to Suntiger
is Drew planning on opening any more jimmy johns?
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News