Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Targeting

Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:18 pm
Posted by Justanotherfan
Member since Jun 2021
435 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:18 pm
Is there a targeting rule in the NFL?
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
16525 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:19 pm to
In college he would have been kicked out of the game for head to head contact.
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12061 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:20 pm to
Clear head to head should have been reversed,
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
12421 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:21 pm to
If the nfl goes back this week and issues a fine, the offender should be suspended as long as the victim is out
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
12421 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:21 pm to
Can't review a penalty
Posted by Wadey
Member since Sep 2020
2053 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:21 pm to
Wow nobody saw the helmet to helmet. Total bulshit
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23895 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:21 pm to
Not only head to head. He also lowered his helmet to go helmet to helmet. It was fricking blatant.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
19409 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

The NFL's rule against leading with the helmet states that it is a foul if a player: Lowers their head and makes forcible contact with their helmet against an opponent
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
36900 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:22 pm to
Would have been called against the Saints D 100% of the time
Posted by Ragincajun79
Member since Nov 2021
32 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:24 pm to
And yet none them said anything about it other then olave to a shot and is in the tent. That dude should be fined big time
Posted by Stirling
Kenner
Member since Nov 2016
307 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:24 pm to
How come Mike Pereira didn’t say anything?
Posted by Domeskeller
Astrodome
Member since Jun 2020
9678 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Can't review a penalty


Which makes replay review idiotic. We're selective about what gets reviewed, we make calls on the field so that certain things can be made reviewable, etc. It's an idiotic system.

With that said, this team sucks and this play will have no bearing on the game's outcome.
This post was edited on 10/13/24 at 12:27 pm
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23895 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

quote:

The NFL's rule against leading with the helmet states that it is a foul if a player: Lowers their head and makes forcible contact with their helmet against an opponent


So it was literally the fricking definition of targeting by the NFL rules. Unfrickingbelievable.

And, they not only saw Chris Olave go down, he’s now out of the fricking game.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
19409 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:35 pm to
It was a bang bang play. I don’t think there was intent by the Bucs player, but by the rule it was a penalty. The evidence is Olave being evaluated for concussion.
This post was edited on 10/13/24 at 12:36 pm
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23895 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

I don’t think there was intent by the Bucs player


You don't THINK.

Which is exactly why intent has no part in the rule.
This post was edited on 10/13/24 at 12:48 pm
Posted by HooDooWitch
TD Bronze member
Member since Sep 2009
11178 posts
Posted on 10/13/24 at 12:45 pm to
Kyle Tutley would have torn his head off and tossed it in the bleachers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram