- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Taking Akiem Hicks over Brandon Thompson
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:51 am to FootballNostradamus
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:51 am to FootballNostradamus
quote:
How did you deduce this from me saying I'd admit my mistake if Hicks turned out to be a great player?
get an education in English and then we'll talk. Reading comprehension....makes life easier.
1
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:53 am to FootballNostradamus
quote:
FootballNostradamus
I'm done with you dude.
I'm not your brother, and i dont know where you came from but if i had to guess your a chicken little, spoiled, bandwagon douchebag. GTFO of here. You dont know much, but you know how to troll, I'll give you that
Take your obnoxiously high standards and pessimistic shite view of our amazingly talented team in its golden age and go cry and cut yourself somewhere else.
This post was edited on 4/28/12 at 8:55 am
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:55 am to jdrumdog
quote:
get an education in English and then we'll talk. Reading comprehension....makes life easier.
Cute.
Done arguing with you. We'll revisit this throughout the season.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:55 am to FootballNostradamus
Every player ever drafted in the history of the Draft is drafted on potential.
Colts: "Peyton Manning could potentially turn into a HOF'er. Let's draft him."
Chargers: "Ryan Leaf could potentially turn into a HOF'er. Let's draft him."
Patriots: "Tom Brady could potentially provide quality depth at our QB position or simply shock us all and turn into a HOF'er. Let's draft him."
Saints: "Hicks is a guy that we really studied. He's got the height, weight, speed; the kind of guy we are looking for in our system...We love his tenacity. We are excited about this player...He is a big-bodied kid. He fits the character of our football team...He's got good work habits. We love his resiliency...Akiem stuck out. We are pretty glad we got him...(At the East-West Shrine game,) He dominated. He threw some bodies around there...He has raw pass rush ability, good feet, good hands......I recognize a little bit of edge rush. Certainly, I think he can be an inside rusher on 3rd down...He passes the eyeball test, he passes the commitment test. He passes the resiliency test...In the 3rd round, you want a guy that has some redeeming qualities of greatness. You cant coach his size and quickness & what this kid is on the hoof." (LET'S DRAFT HIM!")
Colts: "Peyton Manning could potentially turn into a HOF'er. Let's draft him."
Chargers: "Ryan Leaf could potentially turn into a HOF'er. Let's draft him."
Patriots: "Tom Brady could potentially provide quality depth at our QB position or simply shock us all and turn into a HOF'er. Let's draft him."
Saints: "Hicks is a guy that we really studied. He's got the height, weight, speed; the kind of guy we are looking for in our system...We love his tenacity. We are excited about this player...He is a big-bodied kid. He fits the character of our football team...He's got good work habits. We love his resiliency...Akiem stuck out. We are pretty glad we got him...(At the East-West Shrine game,) He dominated. He threw some bodies around there...He has raw pass rush ability, good feet, good hands......I recognize a little bit of edge rush. Certainly, I think he can be an inside rusher on 3rd down...He passes the eyeball test, he passes the commitment test. He passes the resiliency test...In the 3rd round, you want a guy that has some redeeming qualities of greatness. You cant coach his size and quickness & what this kid is on the hoof." (LET'S DRAFT HIM!")
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:56 am to FootballNostradamus
quote:
We'll revisit this throughout the season.
Do us all a favor and just stay on the SEC rant or wherever the frick you came from. Thanks. Regardless of what happens during the LSU season i wont be over there trolling you. Dont come over here and troll me.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:57 am to LSUFreek
solid 
SAINTS : most wins in the NFC since 2006
if you are not happy with that then go frick yourself kindly and find another team please
SAINTS : most wins in the NFC since 2006
if you are not happy with that then go frick yourself kindly and find another team please
Posted on 4/28/12 at 9:01 am to Breesus
quote:
Do us all a favor and just stay on the SEC rant or wherever the frick you came from. Thanks. Regardless of what happens during the LSU season i wont be over there trolling you. Dont come over here and troll me.
Lol, I'm trolling because I disagree with one pick, think our defensive drafting has left some to be desired, feel we've underperformed in the postseason due to a mediocre defense, and don't think we'll win the Super Bowl without one of the top head coaches in the league?
I've been a Saints fan as long as anyone on here. I don't post much on here (or the LSU Rant) because it's evident anyone who disagrees with anything is a mindless troll, bandwagoner.
The MSB is the only place you can get a semi-objective opinion not soaked in homerism.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 9:02 am to touchdown moses
quote:
SAINTS : most wins in the NFC since 2006 and a superbowl if you are not happy with that then go frick yourself kindly and find another team please
Posted on 4/28/12 at 9:04 am to FootballNostradamus
quote:
I'm trolling because I disagree with one pick,
No that part I'm ok with. Its the degrading view of our team and your ignorant and simplistic view of our past 5 seasons that i consider trolling
Posted on 4/28/12 at 9:06 am to Breesus
quote:
No that part I'm ok with. Its the degrading view of our team and your ignorant and simplistic view of our past 5 seasons that i consider trolling
which it is, of course. typical idiot. his previous posts speak for themselves.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 9:46 am to jdrumdog
I love that he is crying that he can't get a debate of "semi-objective opinion" here at Saints Talk, but yet all he has spewed is dipshit "subjective" opinions of his own:
- "This has been the worst offseason ever." (subjective...& narrow-minded to use ONE third round pick to come to this conclusion)
- "...over a three year starter who could really help us against the run." (subjective ...& ignorant of need for an inside disprutor or that we have thoroughly addressed run-stuffing upgrades in FA )
- "I just think this staff focuses a little too much on potential when it comes to the defensive side of the ball." (subjective...& ignorant of the inseparable correlation between "potential" & "every draft prospect ever")
- "This sorry defense will continue to be the anchor to one of the greatest offenses and QBs in league history." (subjective dumbass prophecy)
- "I do think Spags will do well but don't think it will be because of Hicks." (subjective & baseless)
- "I don't see us winning it all without our General." (subjective ...& illogical bait-&-switch debate from demise-by-Hicks, then demise-by-sorry-defense, then demise-by-No-General)
- "This has been the worst offseason ever." (subjective...& narrow-minded to use ONE third round pick to come to this conclusion)
- "...over a three year starter who could really help us against the run." (subjective ...& ignorant of need for an inside disprutor or that we have thoroughly addressed run-stuffing upgrades in FA )
- "I just think this staff focuses a little too much on potential when it comes to the defensive side of the ball." (subjective...& ignorant of the inseparable correlation between "potential" & "every draft prospect ever")
- "This sorry defense will continue to be the anchor to one of the greatest offenses and QBs in league history." (subjective dumbass prophecy)
- "I do think Spags will do well but don't think it will be because of Hicks." (subjective & baseless)
- "I don't see us winning it all without our General." (subjective ...& illogical bait-&-switch debate from demise-by-Hicks, then demise-by-sorry-defense, then demise-by-No-General)
Posted on 4/28/12 at 9:50 am to LSUFreek
BOOM!
Posted on 4/28/12 at 9:54 am to LSUFreek
Posted on 4/28/12 at 9:58 am to LSUFreek
DAYUM!
Posted on 4/28/12 at 10:06 am to LSUFreek
Posted on 4/28/12 at 10:08 am to jdrumdog
Posted on 4/28/12 at 10:12 am to Patrick O Rly
Posted on 4/28/12 at 10:15 am to LSUFreek
quote:
I love that he is crying that he can't get a debate of "semi-objective opinion" here at Saints Talk, but yet all he has spewed is dipshit "subjective" opinions of his own:
- "This has been the worst offseason ever." (subjective...& narrow-minded to use ONE third round pick to come to this conclusion)
- "...over a three year starter who could really help us against the run." (subjective ...& ignorant of need for an inside disprutor or that we have thoroughly addressed run-stuffing upgrades in FA )
- "I just think this staff focuses a little too much on potential when it comes to the defensive side of the ball." (subjective...& ignorant of the inseparable correlation between "potential" & "every draft prospect ever")
- "This sorry defense will continue to be the anchor to one of the greatest offenses and QBs in league history." (subjective dumbass prophecy)
- "I do think Spags will do well but don't think it will be because of Hicks." (subjective & baseless)
- "I don't see us winning it all without our General." (subjective ...& illogical bait-&-switch debate from demise-by-Hicks, then demise-by-sorry-defense, then demise-by-No-General)
just because
Posted on 4/28/12 at 10:18 am to jdrumdog
random gif time before i head to jazz fest? dont mind if i do!
Posted on 4/28/12 at 10:19 am to LSUFreek
quote:
I love that he is crying that he can't get a debate of "semi-objective opinion" here at Saints Talk, but yet all he has spewed is dipshit "subjective" opinions of his own:
Multiple unbiased individuals giving subjective opinions on a topic is considered an objective sample base. Do you understand how this works? Thus my claim that the MSB is where you find objective thoughts was based on the above-stated premise. My opinion, like those of the unbaised, non-homer opinions on the MSB, is of course subjective yet when taken as a whole the population discussing the topic is objective.
quote:
"This has been the worst offseason ever." (subjective...& narrow-minded to use ONE third round pick to come to this conclusion)
You think this is where I to this conclusion?
It might have had something to do with our head coach and GM getting suspended, us losing a 2nd round pick, and not having arguably the best QB in the game signed. Or it could be that I'm upset with our 3rd round pick. Make sense? quote:
"...over a three year starter who could really help us against the run." (subjective ...& ignorant of need for an inside disprutor or that we have thoroughly addressed run-stuffing upgrades in FA )
Thompson is known as a penetrating, run-stuffing DT who can play all alignments from nose out to the 3-tech. He, Ellis, and Bunkley would be perfect together.
quote:
"I just think this staff focuses a little too much on potential when it comes to the defensive side of the ball." (subjective...& ignorant of the inseparable correlation between "potential" & "every draft prospect ever")
You don't think there are some prospects who are more known commodities with lower ceilings versus those who have higher potential but less productivity?
quote:
"This sorry defense will continue to be the anchor to one of the greatest offenses and QBs in league history." (subjective dumbass prophecy)
My opinion.
quote:
"I do think Spags will do well but don't think it will be because of Hicks." (subjective & baseless)
Again, my opinion and not sure how you could say it's baseless.
quote:
"I don't see us winning it all without our General." (subjective ...& illogical bait-&-switch debate from demise-by-Hicks, then demise-by-sorry-defense, then demise-by-No-General)
It's not baseless. Someone was discussing how if Spags improves our defense only marginally then we will be in the Super Bowl insinuating that all other aspects of our team would be the same and an improvement in the defense would land us in the Super Bowl. I was merely pointing out that all aspects aren't the same as the leader of our damn team is gone.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News