- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Some potential targets per Bleacher Report
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:15 pm to htran90
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:15 pm to htran90
Mark Ingram? RBs like him are a dime a dozen and we already have one who is equal are better.
If this FO wastes $5m on ingram with tons of other glaring needs then they are as incompetent as I thought. As if trading up to draft him wasn't enough of a frick up
If this FO wastes $5m on ingram with tons of other glaring needs then they are as incompetent as I thought. As if trading up to draft him wasn't enough of a frick up
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:16 pm to CBandits82
quote:
Do not want Fairley.
our D would get better, but he get us way to many personal fouls and would be suspended every 8th game or something like that.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:17 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
our D would get better, but he get us way to many personal fouls and would be suspended every 8th game or something like that.
I think you have Suh and Fairley confused. Fairley doesn't play enough to get suspended.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 3:35 pm to TG
Go read the write up Mike Triplett had on ESPN about our CAP issues. He's the only one with a clue. He mentions cutting Bunkley, Colston and Hawthorne and turning some guys incentives into signing bonuses.
We are fine cap wise. We won't be major players, but we are gonna get the guys Loomis and Payton want. Which will probably be either Flowers or Buster Skrine
We are fine cap wise. We won't be major players, but we are gonna get the guys Loomis and Payton want. Which will probably be either Flowers or Buster Skrine
Posted on 12/31/14 at 3:55 pm to WicKed WayZ
Caps Myth
Article by Sean Fazende at Fox 8 in New Orleans
Cliff Notes: Ask for pay cuts from Colston and Evans. That would save 6-8 million. Release Grubbs, Hawthorne, and Bunkley, that would save 9.7 million. Restructure Galette, Graham, Lofton, and Byrd, that would save 10.8.
The restructured guys would get their money by moving it to signing bonuses. After that we would shed 36.4 million and give us 16 million under the cap.
At the end, he talks about he will have a separate article about restructuring Drew Brees.
Article by Sean Fazende at Fox 8 in New Orleans
Cliff Notes: Ask for pay cuts from Colston and Evans. That would save 6-8 million. Release Grubbs, Hawthorne, and Bunkley, that would save 9.7 million. Restructure Galette, Graham, Lofton, and Byrd, that would save 10.8.
The restructured guys would get their money by moving it to signing bonuses. After that we would shed 36.4 million and give us 16 million under the cap.
At the end, he talks about he will have a separate article about restructuring Drew Brees.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 4:54 pm to LSUZombie
Flowers is a pure zone corner. KC cut him because when he played in a press-man scheme, he was the second to worst corner in the league. Do not want.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 6:06 pm to Sader1990
Thanks for the shout out goat!
Loomis Magic
Also, Sean F's numbers are wrong, at least when it comes to those four players' bonuses. We save about $20 mil, not $10. That gets us to or just under the cap and were planned adjustments to not have guaranteed money year one and to spread out the hits.
Loomis Magic
Also, Sean F's numbers are wrong, at least when it comes to those four players' bonuses. We save about $20 mil, not $10. That gets us to or just under the cap and were planned adjustments to not have guaranteed money year one and to spread out the hits.
This post was edited on 12/31/14 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 12/31/14 at 6:18 pm to Zoombop
He would be the cheapest corner out there.
The guy I want is Byron Maxwell but we would have to pay him a hefty contract
The guy I want is Byron Maxwell but we would have to pay him a hefty contract
Posted on 12/31/14 at 6:44 pm to CBandits82
quote:
Do not want Fairley.
Posted on 12/31/14 at 10:24 pm to LSUZombie
quote:
DT Nick Fairley,
frick this cheap shottin' mother fricker.... frick him and his whole fricking family....
Posted on 12/31/14 at 10:25 pm to Zoombop
quote:
Flowers is a pure zone corner. KC cut him because when he played in a press-man scheme, he was the second to worst corner in the league. Do not want.
was about to post this when i scrolled up... people wanting Flowers are playing too much Madden....
Popular
Back to top

0






