Started By
Message

re: Some potential targets per Bleacher Report

Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:15 pm to
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
73874 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:15 pm to
Mark Ingram? RBs like him are a dime a dozen and we already have one who is equal are better.

If this FO wastes $5m on ingram with tons of other glaring needs then they are as incompetent as I thought. As if trading up to draft him wasn't enough of a frick up
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
59560 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Do not want Fairley.


our D would get better, but he get us way to many personal fouls and would be suspended every 8th game or something like that.
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
29519 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

our D would get better, but he get us way to many personal fouls and would be suspended every 8th game or something like that.



I think you have Suh and Fairley confused. Fairley doesn't play enough to get suspended.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
33347 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 3:35 pm to
Go read the write up Mike Triplett had on ESPN about our CAP issues. He's the only one with a clue. He mentions cutting Bunkley, Colston and Hawthorne and turning some guys incentives into signing bonuses.


We are fine cap wise. We won't be major players, but we are gonna get the guys Loomis and Payton want. Which will probably be either Flowers or Buster Skrine
Posted by Sader1990
Metairie
Member since Jun 2013
1095 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 3:55 pm to
Caps Myth

Article by Sean Fazende at Fox 8 in New Orleans
Cliff Notes: Ask for pay cuts from Colston and Evans. That would save 6-8 million. Release Grubbs, Hawthorne, and Bunkley, that would save 9.7 million. Restructure Galette, Graham, Lofton, and Byrd, that would save 10.8.
The restructured guys would get their money by moving it to signing bonuses. After that we would shed 36.4 million and give us 16 million under the cap.

At the end, he talks about he will have a separate article about restructuring Drew Brees.
Posted by Zoombop
Westbank
Member since Feb 2013
987 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 4:54 pm to
Flowers is a pure zone corner. KC cut him because when he played in a press-man scheme, he was the second to worst corner in the league. Do not want.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 6:06 pm to
Thanks for the shout out goat!

Loomis Magic

Also, Sean F's numbers are wrong, at least when it comes to those four players' bonuses. We save about $20 mil, not $10. That gets us to or just under the cap and were planned adjustments to not have guaranteed money year one and to spread out the hits.
This post was edited on 12/31/14 at 6:07 pm
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
33347 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 6:18 pm to
He would be the cheapest corner out there.

The guy I want is Byron Maxwell but we would have to pay him a hefty contract
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
37964 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Do not want Fairley.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
26689 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

DT Nick Fairley,

frick this cheap shottin' mother fricker.... frick him and his whole fricking family....
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
26689 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Flowers is a pure zone corner. KC cut him because when he played in a press-man scheme, he was the second to worst corner in the league. Do not want.

was about to post this when i scrolled up... people wanting Flowers are playing too much Madden....
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram