- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/1/09 at 1:41 pm to Sophandros
Posted on 12/1/09 at 1:52 pm to Sophandros
even with the patriots win you have no chance to have a higher sov than us jesus christ you people are retarded
Posted on 12/1/09 at 1:56 pm to Flowbie
It really doesn't matter cause I'm pretty sure you are gonna lose atleast 2 of your next 5. We however will win out and your stupid little chart and existence both become irrelevant.
P.S. you will make the playoffs and lose your first game.
P.S. you will make the playoffs and lose your first game.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:07 pm to Ibleedblackandgold
quote:
It really doesn't matter cause I'm pretty sure you are gonna lose atleast 2 of your next 5. We however will win out and your stupid little chart and existence both become irrelevant.
i didnt make the chart, someone from this board did but cool. i dont care if you win out, i never said you wouldnt. but you dont automatically get into the super bowl for being undefeated sorry. as for losing 2 more games, according to saints talk we would finish with 5 losses
quote:
P.S. you will make the playoffs and lose your first game.
same to you
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:22 pm to Flowbie
quote:
even with the patriots win you have no chance to have a higher sov than us jesus christ you people are retarded
No, you're the retard because you changed the subject once you found that your original position was untenable.
Once you realized that you could not produce any objective evidence to validate your claim that the Vikings are a better team, you decided to change the discussion to the tiebreaking procedure.
Failure.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:27 pm to Flowbie
QB-Saints - duh
RB-Vikings Very debatable as a whole
Receiving Corps-Vikings - you fricking serious?
O-Line-Vikings - I seriously doubt that.
D-Line-Vikings - duh.
Linebackers-Vikings
Secondary-Saints
Punting-Saints
Kicking-Vikings
Special Teams-Vikings
Training Staff-Vikings
Coaching-Saints
The rest seems fine, but to think you have better receivers is pretty unfathomable after the Pats game. Those receivers were running damn good routes and brees was hitting them almost every time.
RB-Vikings Very debatable as a whole
Receiving Corps-Vikings - you fricking serious?
O-Line-Vikings - I seriously doubt that.
D-Line-Vikings - duh.
Linebackers-Vikings
Secondary-Saints
Punting-Saints
Kicking-Vikings
Special Teams-Vikings
Training Staff-Vikings
Coaching-Saints
The rest seems fine, but to think you have better receivers is pretty unfathomable after the Pats game. Those receivers were running damn good routes and brees was hitting them almost every time.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:28 pm to Flowbie
quote:
QB-Saints
RB-Vikings
Receiving Corps-Vikings
O-Line-Vikings
D-Line-Vikings
Linebackers-Vikings
Secondary-Saints
Punting-Saints
Kicking-Vikings
Special Teams-Vikings
Training Staff-Vikings
Waterboys-Vikings
Cheerleaders-Push, leaning towards Vikings
Coaching-Saints
You forgot one...
Wins-Saints
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:29 pm to SJS Eagle 85
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:29 pm to Sophandros
As a unit we are better than you in every aspect of offense. Defensively you hold a slight edge in a few categories and have huge dropoffs in Turnovers. I don't think anyone is saying you guys aren't a great football team. What we are saying is that you are not as good as us. Hold your tongue about that bandwagon bullshite. While we have many people jumping on, the majority of us have been diehards all of our lives. We live, sleep, and eat Saints football here.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:30 pm to Flowbie
quote:
there is too much pressure on trying to go 16-0 and there is no reward for achieving that
fail. the reward is old man favre trying to audible in our house.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:32 pm to Flowbie
quote:
Cheerleaders-Push, leaning towards Vikings
And for the record, the dogs you call women in the north can't begin to compare with the women from the South.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:39 pm to Mr. Wayne
From an unbiased eye:
QB: Saints>>Vikings +2
RB: Vikings>>>Saints -3
WR: Saints>>Vikings +2
TE: Saints>>Vikings +2
OL: Push =
DL: Vikings>>Saints -2
LB: Vikings>>Saints -2
CB: Saints>Vikings +1
Safety: Saints>>Vikings +2
which comes out to +3 for the Saints and that isn't even considering the home field and coaching advantages the Saints will have.
QB: Saints>>Vikings +2
RB: Vikings>>>Saints -3
WR: Saints>>Vikings +2
TE: Saints>>Vikings +2
OL: Push =
DL: Vikings>>Saints -2
LB: Vikings>>Saints -2
CB: Saints>Vikings +1
Safety: Saints>>Vikings +2
which comes out to +3 for the Saints and that isn't even considering the home field and coaching advantages the Saints will have.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:44 pm to Mr. Wayne
quote:
And for the record, the dogs you call women in the north can't begin to compare with the women from the South.
This is true. I understand the women up north don't shave anything so they can keep warm. Does your mom own a razor flowbie? Geaux check real quick we will hold.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:56 pm to Ibleedblackandgold
We're retarded? You f#*&ing dick smokers up there can't even build a damn bridge and we're retarded! You should be banned for being an arse wipe. Go away!
Posted on 12/1/09 at 2:58 pm to TIGER PASS
quote:
You f#*&ing dick smokers up there can't even build a damn bridge and we're retarded!
Posted on 12/1/09 at 3:02 pm to TIGER PASS
quote:
You f#*&ing dick smokers up there can't even build a damn bridge and we're retarded!
This isn't a good argument to start. Multiple people died and plenty more were injured. It's about as funny as bringing up Katrina.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 3:03 pm to Flowbie
( ...words fail me on this... ) .
Posted on 12/1/09 at 3:49 pm to RedHawk
How can RBs and OL be even or better for the Vikings when the Saints average more yards per game, a higher yards per carry, have more rushing touchdowns, have a better rushing DVOA, etc?
Posted on 12/1/09 at 4:30 pm to Flowbie
what good is you WR if we shut them down? 
and don't you dare say that moss/welker (who had a combined 99 yards receiving no Td's) aren't better than Sidney "all i do is run fly routes" Rice and Bernard Berrian, that shite won't work with Sharper back there. It will be like 3 flies in.
PS. Will Smith has 10 sacks, 2.5 less than Jared Allen. So its not like Favre will have all the time in the world to be throwing either.
Oh and Brett Favre just called, he shite in his wranglers and needs you to go change them.
and don't you dare say that moss/welker (who had a combined 99 yards receiving no Td's) aren't better than Sidney "all i do is run fly routes" Rice and Bernard Berrian, that shite won't work with Sharper back there. It will be like 3 flies in.
PS. Will Smith has 10 sacks, 2.5 less than Jared Allen. So its not like Favre will have all the time in the world to be throwing either.
Oh and Brett Favre just called, he shite in his wranglers and needs you to go change them.
Page 11 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News