re: Saints-Vikings Comparison

quote:

---

Against teams with winning records:

You: 2-1 all of them close
Us: 4-0 three of them blowouts

---

umm, that's proof

quote:

---

You: 2-1 all of them close
Us: 4-0 three of them blowouts

---

which four would those be? new england and who else

if you're counting the jets and giants, those are not good teams.

quote:

---

What you just posted makes absolutely no point. Just what were you trying to say with that?

---

our opponents have a higher winning percentage than yours and we play more winning teams down the stretch than you? how is that making no point

you played the eagles without their starting quarterback, the giants are not good at all, and the falcons are overrated because everyone wants matt ryan to be the next golden boy even though he's been awful this year

so basically you beat one good team and a bunch of mediocre ones.

edit:not sure what you're talking about leaving new england out. if you're talking about that chart i didn't make it and obviously it was made before this week. i'm not sweeping anything to the side. it doesnt change the fact we play more winning teams down the stretch

quote:

---

you played the eagles without their starting quarterback, the giants are not good at all, and the falcons are overrated

---

McNabb had nothing to do with us hanging nearly half a hundred on them. And the giants and falcons are better than Chicago and Detroit for crying out loud.

quote:

---

so basically you beat one good team and a bunch of mediocre ones.

---

Nah, we blew out a really good team and blew out some more good teams.

You beat one mediocre team twice and lost to the 6-5 Steelers.

quote:

---

it doesnt change the fact we play more winning teams down the stretch

---

You play Arizona and Cincinnati. We play Dallas. Congrats on playing ONE more good team than we do.

quote:

---

so basically you beat one good team and a bunch of mediocre ones.

---

The best team ya'll beat were the Packers

The best team we beat were the 3 time Super Bowl Champs New England Patriots.

Ya'll will drop another game anyway so this is all for nothing.

quote:

---

Saints > Vikings, but anyone saying Adrian Peterson isn't a beast is a fricking moron.

---

No one is saying that. We're saying that the saints rushing attack, as a whole, is better than the vikes. stats back that up.

Dude do you really think your WR's are better than ours if so you need to watch alittle more football

You play:
Cardinals - 7-4 and leading their division, come on.
Bengals - Will beat you.
Bears - Please, Cutler and Forte haven't been performing and the D is way down
Panthers - Beat them already and will beat them again
Giants - We already whooped them

Your schedule doesn't look tough at all. We play the Cowboys (a division leader like Zona) but in a tougher division.
-------------------------------------------
As for Receiving Corps. Throw Rice and Colston out. Who do you have matching Henderson? Meachem? Moore (when he is back)? Shockey? D. Thomas (emerging receiving threat)? Bush & P. Thomas (out of the backfield)?

Don't pretend that Berrian, Harvin, Schiancoe, and Chester Taylor can match up. Our 3rd string blocking TE caught a Touchdown pass yesterday.
GTFO

bump for truth