- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Roman Harper re-signs with Saints
Posted on 7/29/11 at 8:51 pm to PokerChamp21
Posted on 7/29/11 at 8:51 pm to PokerChamp21
Glad to have neck back. The Seattle game was due to the fact that Jenkins was out. Injuries cost us that game... your pro bowl strong safety didn't. Gw payton and Loomis understand this.... many of you don't
Posted on 7/29/11 at 8:56 pm to qwerpoiu
quote:
Carl nicks, dave thomas, zach strief etc. could have used this focus, on top of the fact that he is STRICTLY one dimensional.
Thomas and Strief aren't starters and unlikely anybody will be trying to offer either of them starter money.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 8:58 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Carl nicks, dave thomas, zach strief etc. could have used this focus,
what does this even mean?
As in, are we going to have enough cap to get these guys into camp since we just paid Harper? As in, I don't think he should be one of the top paid players on the team. As in, I would rather have Nicks on the team more than I would like to have Harper.
Also, Harper is not all-pro. He made the probowl last year, there's a difference. DeAngelo Hall made the probowl as well. Nearly the whole Cowboy roster made it a year or two ago.
Just my opinion though. While I don't agree with everyone else's, they are free to it.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:02 pm to qwerpoiu
Don't get me wrong, I like Harper, just think that was way too much for him.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:02 pm to qwerpoiu
Harper is solid, not great. But like I said earlier in another thread...Saints would probably be forced to overpay him. Most of the decent/good SS are gone already, even the bargain ones. Harper played his cards and got the contract he wanted. Weddle getting the money he did also didn't help because it set the bar. We had no other viable option at SS, so we had no choice.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:04 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
veteran starter contracts are all going to be going up with the new rookie wage scale.
this should end the thread. i was suspecting this to happen. I also see the trend of rookie contracts to be fully guaranteed being the norm since they are much much lower.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:07 pm to purplepylon
It's a lot but Its what we needed to do so I have no issue with it
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:11 pm to infantry1026
quote:
Especially considering he is a liability in coverage.
One bad game doesn't make him a liability.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:16 pm to qwerpoiu
quote:
As in, are we going to have enough cap to get these guys into camp since we just paid Harper? As in, I don't think he should be one of the top paid players on the team. As in, I would rather have Nicks on the team more than I would like to have Harper.
you dont think we'll be able to sign those guys?
a)nicks is a restricted FA
b)david thomas and zach streif will not be expensive
lighten up
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:18 pm to Lester Earl
I specifically remember the seattle TD where the TE carlson pretends to fall down at the 10 yd line and Harper leaves him to follow the qb on the rollout.
Then the ball is floated to the left side with carlson wide open int he endzone and harper shaking his head.....
Then the ball is floated to the left side with carlson wide open int he endzone and harper shaking his head.....
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:19 pm to SuperRemo
quote:
I specifically remember the seattle TD where the TE carlson pretends to fall down at the 10 yd line and Harper leaves him to follow the qb on the rollout.
Then the ball is floated to the left side with carlson wide open int he endzone and harper shaking his head.....
So you expect that to happen again? He had a bad game it doesn't doom the rest of his career.
This post was edited on 7/29/11 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:21 pm to SuperRemo
If I'm not mistaken Harper and Jenkins were 1 and 2 for yards given up per pass against them in 1 on 1 situations. Link incoming when I find it. Let me go get the laptop.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:24 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
you dont think we'll be able to sign those guys?
a)nicks is a restricted FA
b)david thomas and zach streif will not be expensive
lighten up
Sorry, one of those moods.
But seriously, do you think he should be the top paid player on defense? One of the top paid players on the team?
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:28 pm to qwerpoiu
You should ask youself first.
Does gregg williams the def. cord. of the Saints want him?
Then like rain the answer will be at your feet.
Does gregg williams the def. cord. of the Saints want him?
Then like rain the answer will be at your feet.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:29 pm to qwerpoiu
I like Harper, but don't like this deal at all.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:30 pm to qwerpoiu
quote:
But seriously, do you think he should be the top paid player on defense?
Will Smith makes 11 mil a year. Vilam got 17 million guaranteed
some of our best defenders are still on their rookie deals, Porter and Jenkins.
i mean its really not that far fetched. He is a little over priced but there isnt much left on the market that could come in and play.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:32 pm to THRILLHO
His contract makes me think that there were other teams in the mix and the Saints were forced to match a price they wouldn't have offered otherwise.
Posted on 7/29/11 at 9:44 pm to Lester Earl
W. Smith is scheduled to make 6 mil this year
Vilma 5.1 mil
LINK
You said it yourself, he's a little overpriced.
But whatever...
I'm out.
Vilma 5.1 mil
LINK
You said it yourself, he's a little overpriced.
But whatever...
I'm out.
Popular
Back to top


0







