Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Offensive identity and the draft

Posted on 1/20/23 at 1:52 pm
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
10778 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 1:52 pm
First of all, I think the saints get broncos 1st for Sean, so late round 1st. I'm thinking the saints should potentially use that pick for bijan Robinson. You get the power back to compliment AK. Our LT rookie is a road grader, and our 2 main weapons outside are downfield threats... I think a run heavy, PA deep offense would fit our personnel well, and it would also compliment our biggest strength, defense.

Thoughts?
This post was edited on 1/20/23 at 1:53 pm
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
25899 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 1:56 pm to
Never use a 1st round pick on a RB. That’s my thoughts.
Posted by TwoDatBait
Northshore, LA
Member since Jul 2011
5758 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 2:04 pm to
If we get that pick, trade it for a 24 first…
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
10778 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 2:05 pm to
I expect that pick to be #31, so I guess. If the pick were lower, I'd agree
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
30196 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

I expect that pick to be #31, so I guess. If the pick were lower, I'd agree


Do you think San Fran is gonna win the Super Bowl? There are only 31 picks in round one due to the Dolphins losing theirs for tampering. I'm thinking closer to the 26-28 range.
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
10778 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 2:43 pm to
Semantics. The pick will be #31 if SF makes the SB and loses. #21 is forfeited.
This post was edited on 1/20/23 at 2:51 pm
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
25899 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 2:50 pm to
If you would have told me three years ago that we’d have the last pick in the 2023 draft, I would’ve been thrilled. I definitely would’ve never thought it would be a trade involving CSP.
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
10778 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 2:53 pm to
If we drafting #31, I doubt someone trades a future 1st for it. I guess it's possible, but it would have to be a good team or someone falls in love with hooker.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10914 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 3:26 pm to
The Saints are not trading the rights to CSP for a single late 1st rd pick in 2023.

There's precedent for trading a SB winning coach and that trade doesn't even come close to fair compensation.

Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
10390 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 5:06 am to
quote:

The Saints are not trading the rights to CSP for a single late 1st rd pick in 2023.

There's precedent for trading a SB winning coach and that trade doesn't even come close to fair compensation.


Any trade involving SP will include a first this year in addition to other picks.

I'm typically against a first round RB, but the end of the round is basically no different than an early second round grade.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
5722 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 10:12 am to
There’s just too many good RB you can plug and play. Never waste a 1 on a RB. If you want better rushing use the 1 to draft a new LG to replace Peat or a DT to help stop the run. Or a WR because as much as I love Olave he looks like a top shelf WR2 but not a true 1 like they are banking on.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram