- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mickey Loomis is historically good
Posted on 8/25/25 at 3:39 pm to bayou85
Posted on 8/25/25 at 3:39 pm to bayou85
No because, as painful as it would be, if this team looks worse than last year I will say, VERY reluctantly, that maybe we were overly harsh on Allen and he was working with less than what it seemed, and Mickey has failed to keep things adequately balanced to maintain the roster.
If the team is instead on an upward trajectory, I don't conversely expect anyone here to admit that maybe Mickey isn't as bad as people claim, because he will never get credit for anything good.
If the team is instead on an upward trajectory, I don't conversely expect anyone here to admit that maybe Mickey isn't as bad as people claim, because he will never get credit for anything good.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 3:41 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:Where are the excuses? What have I said that is an excuse. All I've done is point to facts, and have even said how horrible of a move hiring and keeping Allen was. Even I wanted Mickey fired if Allen wasn't gone after last year, injuries be damned.
these excuses.
Allen was a thing we should have never suffered, but now we are moving on.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 3:58 pm to bonethug0180
“7-10 with Andy Dalton” - who do you think chose the QB room and roster!?!!?
“9-8 with Carr” - like we should be impressed with a 9-8 season in which we missed the playoffs against the easiest schedule in the league?
“Injuries” - like every other team in the league? Who is responsible for shite drafting and minimal cap space to provide adequate depth?
The record and lack of playoff, the depth chart, and the cap space speak for themselves, it’s crazy work to try and argue against the facts. Mickey’s moves in 2025 are an acknowledgment to the failures of post Brees. You’re on an island
“9-8 with Carr” - like we should be impressed with a 9-8 season in which we missed the playoffs against the easiest schedule in the league?
“Injuries” - like every other team in the league? Who is responsible for shite drafting and minimal cap space to provide adequate depth?
The record and lack of playoff, the depth chart, and the cap space speak for themselves, it’s crazy work to try and argue against the facts. Mickey’s moves in 2025 are an acknowledgment to the failures of post Brees. You’re on an island
Posted on 8/25/25 at 4:01 pm to GynoSandberg
You want to argue the nuance of being the 20th best team vs being the worst team. Like there is some silver fricking lining to take from the past seasons. The silver lining is it www so bad it forced a hard reset
Posted on 8/25/25 at 4:20 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:Dalton was the backup and Winston got hurt. But yeah we'll act like every team who loses their starter always has a backup that can come in and light it up. This isn't an excuse, this is pointing out that we still got to 7-10 despite our backup starting 14 games.
“7-10 with Andy Dalton”
quote:Again not an excuse. It was a winning record and barely missed playoff season with Carmichael still on board. Just like I said how much Loomis really sucked for hiring and keeping Allen, the same goes for keeping Carmichael. It was a huge mistake. With both I am admitting the mistakes, not making excuses for them. I know that may be hard to see with the blind hate you have that I am also acknowledging where Loomis fricked up.
“9-8 with Carr”
But, unlike the Allen mistake, Loomis actually fixed this one the following year.
quote:2024 wasn't a normal injury year. Go look up how many games our starters missed. Now go compare that to any other team (if there are enough to compare) how had that amount of missing games from their starters and did well. I doubt you'll find any team that even broke .500 with that many games missed by starters, especially the qb.
“Injuries
This is not an excuse, this was the reality of that season, and as much as it sucked to have a season lost to injuries, it finally forced Allen out so for that I am thankful. Had we gone 9-8 or 8-9 again Allen probably comes back for another year and I would have been on here calling for Loomis' head as well (like I started to prior to the 2024 season).
Posted on 8/25/25 at 4:52 pm to saints5021
quote:
s is historically goodby saints5021Mickey Loomis is going to be in the Hall of Fame as an General Manager.
Why should winning under 9 games a year put you in the HOF?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 5:31 pm to thenza
Historically..horses were great for travel, but I wouldnt want to ride across the whole country on one.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 6:40 pm to thenza
Mickey Loomis got historically lucky with Drew. Otherwise he’s a lazy idiot.
Popular
Back to top

0





