- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: March 17th is when we need to cut Carr by to keep him from getting another $30M guaranteed
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:48 am to GynoSandberg
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:48 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
He’s made 169 career starts and carries a career winning percentage of 45%
I get what you are saying, but his whole career has been with the raiders and a Dennis Allen led Saints team. That’s about as bad as it gets.
Surrounding talent matters. I’ve used this example before, but Jimmy G had a higher win percentage than both Montana and Steve Young. And got a team to the superbowl.
Went to the raiders and was benched.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:25 am to Townedrunkard
Pretty interesting analogy. Looked up Carr's record by HC and thought this was interesting:
Dennis Allen (both Oak & NO): 14-17 .452 winning %age, (DA career .329)
Tony Sparano: 3-9 .250 winning %age, (TS career .438)
Jack DelRio: 25-21 .543 winning %age, (JD career .497)
Jon Gruden: 22-31 .415 winning %age, (JG career .511)
R Bisaccia: 7-5 .583 winning %age, (TS career .583)
Josh McDaniels: 6-11 .400 winning %age, (JM career .377)
I don't think this really means anything other than the only good HC he played for was Gruden. I think a lot of us like Del Rio, but his overall record is bad; however, does he get the benefit of the doubt since his record was built on 9 years with Jax and 3 years with Oak?
Sparano & Gruden are the only coaches that have a higher career winning %age without Carr.
Is Josh McDaniels the offensive version of DA, or was he a product of Brady?
Dennis Allen (both Oak & NO): 14-17 .452 winning %age, (DA career .329)
Tony Sparano: 3-9 .250 winning %age, (TS career .438)
Jack DelRio: 25-21 .543 winning %age, (JD career .497)
Jon Gruden: 22-31 .415 winning %age, (JG career .511)
R Bisaccia: 7-5 .583 winning %age, (TS career .583)
Josh McDaniels: 6-11 .400 winning %age, (JM career .377)
I don't think this really means anything other than the only good HC he played for was Gruden. I think a lot of us like Del Rio, but his overall record is bad; however, does he get the benefit of the doubt since his record was built on 9 years with Jax and 3 years with Oak?
Sparano & Gruden are the only coaches that have a higher career winning %age without Carr.
Is Josh McDaniels the offensive version of DA, or was he a product of Brady?
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:31 am to High Life
The saints paid mid-range money for a mid-range QB. I don't know what people were expecting.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 5:42 pm to patches_ohoulihan
A 45% winning percentage does not mean Carr is a BAD QB.Archie
Manning winning % was much worse because he was on horribly run
franchise.If Archie had been drafted by a competent team he would have
been a top NFL QB.Carr when healthy and the team healthy rated as a
top 10 QB last season,thats not me saying that thats the NFL stats talking.
Yall can hate on Carr all you want he wasn`t the SAINTS problem.Some of you are just blinded by hate.
Manning winning % was much worse because he was on horribly run
franchise.If Archie had been drafted by a competent team he would have
been a top NFL QB.Carr when healthy and the team healthy rated as a
top 10 QB last season,thats not me saying that thats the NFL stats talking.
Yall can hate on Carr all you want he wasn`t the SAINTS problem.Some of you are just blinded by hate.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:34 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
I get what you are saying, but his whole career has been with the raiders and a Dennis Allen led Saints team. That’s about as bad as it gets.
And he had a chance to leave the raiders and chose to play for Dennis Allen where he could collect his money and be comfortable. Dude isn’t exactly a competitive freak like some of these QBs. Mediocrity tends to attract mediocrity and he kinda is what he is.
This post was edited on 3/7/25 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 3/8/25 at 6:32 pm to UncleLester
And we structured his hit in 2026 is 69 million
Mickey is a cap god...... smh
Mickey is a cap god...... smh
Posted on 3/8/25 at 8:04 pm to WhiteMandingo
That's $2.5M for every redzone turnover that he'll ultimately have in 2025 and try and blame one of his teammates for (with his gestures).
Posted on 3/10/25 at 10:29 pm to UncleLester
Season ticket renewal due on March 21
Posted on 3/10/25 at 10:38 pm to St Augustine
quote:
And he had a chance to leave the raiders and chose to play for Dennis Allen where he could collect his money and be comfortable. Dude isn’t exactly a competitive freak like some of these QBs. Mediocrity tends to attract mediocrity and he kinda is what he is.
Hate to break it to you but most teams that are getting QBs off the scrap heap (free agency) are not going to be franchise QBs or they were at one time and well past their prime.
And those teams are usually bad and looking for a qb to change their fortunes.
Teams usually hang on to the good ones and don’t let them hit the market.
Brees was damaged goods, only reason he hit the fa pool.
This post was edited on 3/10/25 at 10:41 pm
Popular
Back to top

2





