- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kamara catch was incomplete. Should have been ruled as so
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:38 pm to Rohan Gravy
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:38 pm to Rohan Gravy
Ball was moving
2
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:48 pm to Rohan Gravy
He caught the ball with one foot. Then secured it before the 2nd foot touched in bounds. Therefore it is a catch.
You are basically saying that any player who catches the ball in the air on a jump does not have possession before landing.
I don't know what else to tell you. Over 170 people have downvoted you to tell you are wrong.
You are basically saying that any player who catches the ball in the air on a jump does not have possession before landing.
I don't know what else to tell you. Over 170 people have downvoted you to tell you are wrong.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:47 am to Rohan Gravy
quote:
Ball was moving
This is called moving the goalposts. You are changing your argument.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 12:58 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
Ball was moving
The ball is always moving. Dumbass.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:02 pm to Rohan Gravy
Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:03 pm to moneyg
quote:
You are changing your argument.
he changed it 3 times since starting the thread.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 5:36 pm to MasterKnight
quote:
He caught the ball with one foot.
No
He didn’t
Posted on 12/19/24 at 5:39 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
The ball is always moving. Dumbass.
This might be the absolutely most stupidest reetarded post
In the history of reetarded posts
The Earth is always moving dumbfrickingass
Posted on 12/19/24 at 5:40 pm to moneyg
quote:
This is called moving the goalposts.
You are changing your argument.
No
Just adding additional information to help you understand
What you are incapable of understanding
Posted on 12/19/24 at 5:48 pm to Mouth
You must have possession when the first foot hit
He did not have possession when the first foot hit
He didn’t have possession till the second foot hit
Therefore he only had possession with one foot in (the second foot)
Posted on 12/19/24 at 5:56 pm to Rohan Gravy
The ball was not in his hand when his first foot came down? Is that what you are saying?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 6:00 pm to Rohan Gravy
Wrong you do not need to have possession when your first foot hits the ground lol. How many times has a player bobbled the ball in his hands and then maintain possession while going to the ground. What you are saying is that it is not a catch bc he bobbled it when making contact lol.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 6:17 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
No
Yes
quote:
Just adding additional information to help you understand
What you are incapable of understanding
Let’s see what we can agree upon.
IF the ball didn’t move after it hit Kamara’s hand, and then he managed to get two feet in and survive hitting the ground without the ball moving, is it a catch?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 6:23 pm to Rohan Gravy
You don't need to make a football move once you cross the goal line. The ball is dead at that point. He crossed the goal line with possession and his 2nd foot touching in bounds.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 9:45 pm to MasterKnight
quote:
How many times has a player bobbled the ball in his hands and then maintain possession while going to the ground.
Thank you for making my argument for me
Posted on 12/19/24 at 9:48 pm to MasterKnight
quote:
He crossed the goal line with possession and his 2nd foot touching in bounds.
He didn’t have possession till his second foot touched
He needed a “third” foot to touch at that point
Posted on 12/19/24 at 9:55 pm to moneyg
quote:
Let’s see what we can agree upon.
IF the ball didn’t move after it hit Kamara’s hand, and then he managed to get two feet in and survive hitting the ground without the ball moving, is it a catch?
The ball was moving and needs to be secured when the first foot touched
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:13 pm to Rohan Gravy
They are ruled catches lol. The argument I made is that they are ruled catches. Kamara was ruled correctly as a catch.
You can not be this dumb. You have to be trolling at this point.
You can not be this dumb. You have to be trolling at this point.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:16 pm to Rohan Gravy
He did not need to make a football move. He crossed the goal line with the ball while securing the ball with his 2nd foot in bounds. Once the ball is breaking the plane of the end zone, the ball is dead.
How can you not grasp that idea? So many people have proved you wrong. If you can not understand, I suggest you stop watching football bc the basic rule is escaping you.
How can you not grasp that idea? So many people have proved you wrong. If you can not understand, I suggest you stop watching football bc the basic rule is escaping you.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:08 pm to Rohan Gravy
How are you still doing this
Jesus
Just a generational run of being wrong
Jesus
Just a generational run of being wrong
Page 9 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News