- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Derek Barnett or Reuben Foster?
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:35 pm
Or other?
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:39 pm to PhillyTiger90
Barnett won't be there. Allen and Garrett won't be there either. Foster may be there. Probably looking at Jabrill Peppers or Zach Cunningham at best though.
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:43 pm to Suntiger
Foster is one of the dumbest individuals that you would ever be around.
Believe me I know people that went to High school with him and I know people that were there for his 2nd and 3rd attempts at the ACT and I would bet my left "nut" that he did not take the 4th attempt himself.
Believe me I know people that went to High school with him and I know people that were there for his 2nd and 3rd attempts at the ACT and I would bet my left "nut" that he did not take the 4th attempt himself.
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:50 pm to tigerterrace
Nobody is drafting him to teach physics, his instincts and ability are off the charts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:52 pm to Suntiger
quote:
Jabrill Peppers
will be a terrible pick by the franchise that takes him in the first
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:11 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
quote:
Jabrill Peppers
will be a terrible pick by the franchise that takes him in the first
Why do you say that? He could be Shaq Thompson/Thomas David type LBer or Palumalu type SS.
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:16 pm to tigerterrace
quote:
Foster is one of the dumbest individuals that you would ever be around.
I had no idea the Saints only drafted Rhodes Scholars.
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:18 pm to rsylve
I saw a few mock drafts with Barnett going in the 20-25 range and I died laughing
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:50 pm to Suntiger
quote:
Why do you say that? He could be Shaq Thompson/Thomas David type LBer or Palumalu type SS.
he's 205 pounds and doesn't really have a nose for the football. He had 66 tackles this year and has 1 career interception. Those guys you just named were tackling machines in college. There are quite a few cornerbacks bigger than him in the league right now. Basically he doesn't have the ability to be elite in coverage and doesn't have the size and strength to be elite in the box.
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:56 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
You can look at my post history I was very high on Peppers not too long ago. Then I saw him bitch out of the bowl game with a "hamstring". Seems to have diva written all over him
If Barnett doesn't fall id be ecstatic with Foster or T-Williams
If Barnett doesn't fall id be ecstatic with Foster or T-Williams
Posted on 1/1/17 at 10:54 pm to PhillyTiger90
Barnett or trade down imo. Still a lot of time to go, but that's my preference as of right now. I'd like Allen, but we have no shot at him. At least there is a small chance that Barnett falls to #11.
I'd rather not draft a CB at #11, & I like Foster's size & athleticism...but not 100% sold on him yet. I guess that could change with time though.
I want no part of Tim Williams at #11...that would piss me off. He might end up being a great pass rusher, but I hope we go another direction. Don't like Peppers at #11 either...great talent, but a lot of question marks. We shouldn't take high upside guys with question marks at pick #11.
You're right though. Barnett & Foster seem to be the 2 most logical targets at #11 as of right now.
I'd rather not draft a CB at #11, & I like Foster's size & athleticism...but not 100% sold on him yet. I guess that could change with time though.
I want no part of Tim Williams at #11...that would piss me off. He might end up being a great pass rusher, but I hope we go another direction. Don't like Peppers at #11 either...great talent, but a lot of question marks. We shouldn't take high upside guys with question marks at pick #11.
You're right though. Barnett & Foster seem to be the 2 most logical targets at #11 as of right now.
This post was edited on 1/1/17 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 1/1/17 at 11:23 pm to PhillyTiger90
i'd rather a D-lineman myself but wouldn't be disappointed with Foster.
Front seven on defense.. you can't go wrong IMO.
Front seven on defense.. you can't go wrong IMO.
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:02 am to PhillyTiger90
Barnett would be a steal at 11. Him opposite of cam with rankins and possibly fairley. That would be a hell of a defensive front 4.
This post was edited on 1/2/17 at 2:04 am
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:16 am to uptowntiger84
I wouldn't be mad at Foster or Cunningham. I think they can sign a DE opposite of Cam in FA.
Regardless, I want the Saints to target mostly, if not anything but defense. I mean shite, why wouldn't you? The only position on offense that is worrisome is Evans.
1st Round: LB
2nd Round: LB/CB
3rd round: DE/DT/CB
4th round: OL
Regardless, I want the Saints to target mostly, if not anything but defense. I mean shite, why wouldn't you? The only position on offense that is worrisome is Evans.
1st Round: LB
2nd Round: LB/CB
3rd round: DE/DT/CB
4th round: OL
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:44 am to PhillyTiger90
Barnett. Some have him going lower than 11 but i dont see how. I would be estatic. We have to go front 7 imo. Tabor wont be there. Dont like anybody else in secondary other than adams that early but we dont need safety pick right there
Love the draft this year way more than last season. A ton of pass rushers and Line backers
Love the draft this year way more than last season. A ton of pass rushers and Line backers
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News