- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/8/12 at 8:51 pm to shel311
Why is there no paragraph 6?
Posted on 5/9/12 at 9:29 am to shel311
No clue. I did not catch that.
Posted on 5/9/12 at 12:09 pm to shel311
quote:
Why is there no paragraph 6?
Wondering the same. And why are the paragraphs numbered?
Posted on 5/9/12 at 4:01 pm to Telephone Tough Guy
quote:
Wondering the same. And why are the paragraphs numbered?
That's typical in an affidavit, which is more evidence that Hargrove never wrote it.
Posted on 5/9/12 at 9:27 pm to kclsufan
The Commish brought all this on himself by continually bragging about how much and how damning the "bounty documentation was. I must have heard the NFL spout off a dozen times how they had over 15k pages of documentation. Then the NFL solicited the former prosecutor to review and she in turn said how damning and conclusive the data was.
Did the NFL actually think eventually people would NOT start asking to see all the "data"? If I didn't have a dog in the fight, I still would want to know what the documentation actually said bc the NFL was been bragging for months how great it was.
Did the NFL actually think eventually people would NOT start asking to see all the "data"? If I didn't have a dog in the fight, I still would want to know what the documentation actually said bc the NFL was been bragging for months how great it was.
Posted on 5/10/12 at 9:33 am to STEVED00
Added Hargrove "mischaracterization" story.
Posted on 5/10/12 at 12:08 pm to Fun Bunch
150 pages 
Posted on 5/10/12 at 3:15 pm to Fun Bunch
this thread only strengthens the pissed off smoldering fire within me.
Posted on 5/11/12 at 8:59 am to Fun Bunch
you need to add ornsteins email
Posted on 5/11/12 at 9:10 am to thedice20
quote:
this thread only strengthens the pissed off smoldering fire within me.
It pisses off the gay man inside you?
Posted on 5/11/12 at 9:14 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:
It pisses off the gay man inside you?
hmmmmm
I guess i couldnt accurately articulate how angry i was yesterday. Re-reading it does sound homo
Posted on 5/11/12 at 9:17 am to thedice20
Added the Ornstein email story.
Posted on 5/11/12 at 9:21 am to thedice20
I'm just jerking you...I'm just kidding. 
Posted on 5/11/12 at 9:22 am to Patrick O Rly
quote:
I'm just jerking you...
nohomo?
Posted on 5/11/12 at 10:57 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
How the NFL isn't being crucified for it is beyond me
The media is still taking the Williams audio literally. When he says " Affect the head" he's meaning intimidate. When he says "We want Gore's head going sideways" he means keep him from running North and South, yet the Worldwide Leader and NFL Network keeps pumping out that these are Damning Evidence of a Bounty!
Posted on 5/11/12 at 11:03 am to Cincinnati Bowtie
Why aren't the spending any time on the Giants ADMITTING to going after Kyle Williams concussed head?
That's what I want to know. Yet it is completely ignored.
That's what I want to know. Yet it is completely ignored.
Posted on 5/11/12 at 12:34 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Why aren't the spending any time on the Giants ADMITTING to going after Kyle Williams concussed head?
That's what I want to know. Yet it is completely ignored.
What is annoying is that Aiello has completely blown this off as well as Ryan's comments in his book - "Each game we might also designate an opposing player with a dot," Ryan wrote in a chapter titled, 'Blunt Force Trauma.' "Players don't want to be dotted by the New York Jets, because that means we want that dude knocked out of the game." Aiello said that players are held accountable for their actions on the field (i.e not intent). However, I guess that "rule" only applies to teams like the Giants and Jets whereas the Saints are being severly punished for spoken word and assumed intent. It is ludicrous to me that the owners are sitting back and letting the incompetent one ruin the credibility of their league.
LINK
Posted on 5/11/12 at 3:35 pm to NOSHAU
So....does that mean teams can take out opposing players nut if they don't get paid extra for it.....its ok?
Posted on 5/11/12 at 5:41 pm to thedice20
quote:
this thread only strengthens the pissed off smoldering fire within me.
Stapuffmarshy is pissed the fire is getting fueled!
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News