- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1st round thoughts ?
Posted on 4/25/25 at 7:10 am to saintlad74
Posted on 4/25/25 at 7:10 am to saintlad74
My problem with the Banks pick isn’t the player himself. I think he’s going to be a solid pro for a long time actually. My problem is where the player was selected. Could have traded back and gotten him at 13-14. This meat of this draft class is 2nd and 3rd round guys that can help you rebuild. Could have gotten some extra capital by trading back once or twice and ended with the same result. We all would have been very happy with that.
This post was edited on 4/25/25 at 7:11 am
Posted on 4/25/25 at 7:19 am to BallHawk
quote:
My problem is where the player was selected. Could have traded back and gotten him at 13-14.
That’s a lie. 5 olinemen picked in the top 20 and you think the Saints trading back could have landed the third best one.
lol frick no
Posted on 4/25/25 at 7:25 am to BallHawk
quote:
Could have traded back
Link?
This ain’t Madden. You can’t force a trade. Nobody wanted to move to 9. Banks at 9 is a good value.
quote:
gotten him at 13-14
You can’t say that. Somebody moving up probably would want to move up to take Banks. Mocks aren’t biblical scrips.
This was a good pick.
Posted on 4/25/25 at 8:03 am to DownSouthCrawfish
Anyone that watched Penning consistently get walked back into the QB's lap loves this pick. God forbid Penning or Fuaga gets injured, you would have literal no names playing OT.
Posted on 4/25/25 at 8:07 am to BallHawk
quote:
Could have traded back
Pretty much everyone was trying to trade back this draft. How many did you see actually happen?
Posted on 4/25/25 at 8:08 am to Suntiger
quote:
Banks at 9 is a good value.
This is a bit much. It was a bit of a reach. Not into "bad pick" territory but nowhere near good value at 9
Posted on 4/25/25 at 9:35 am to BallHawk
My problem with the Banks pick isn’t the player himself. I think he’s going to be a solid pro for a long time actually. My problem is where the player was selected. Could have traded back and gotten him at 13-14. This meat of this draft class is 2nd and 3rd round guys that can help you rebuild. Could have gotten some extra capital by trading back once or twice and ended with the same result. We all would have been very happy with that.
___________________________________________
I'm with you on that. I think we could have have traded back a little and got the same player or same position and gain an additional pick or two
___________________________________________
I'm with you on that. I think we could have have traded back a little and got the same player or same position and gain an additional pick or two
Popular
Back to top


4







