Started By
Message

re: We have 2 guys in the top 100 3 point shooting % - that's bad

Posted on 1/17/23 at 8:16 pm to
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
8040 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 8:16 pm to
I’d be perfectly fine with getting rid of the 3 point line or at least moving it back and getting rid of corner 3s
This post was edited on 1/17/23 at 8:17 pm
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2367 posts
Posted on 1/17/23 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

I’d be perfectly fine with getting rid of the 3 point line or at least moving it back and getting rid of corner 3s


Know several folks that feel the same way. The NBA is eventually gonna have to do SOMETHING...given the way frequency of 3-pt shots is increasing with every passing year. But as long as the 3-pt line stays the same as it is...you just gotta take advantage of it...or give the other team a HUGE edge, game in & game out.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 1/18/23 at 9:00 am to
quote:

we need our two best players back more than anything.


i just saw a graphic comparing the " big three" of some top teams.
the pelicans best rated is zion.. cj is pels #2. ingram is #3.

it makes little sense to critique pels construction without all the big three healthy and in sync.

that would let the bench play minutes against other bench guys and to play roles with the stars that are tailored to the bench guys abilities.

sure they need a 3 pt ace.
we knew that in August.
hence the buddy heild chatter last summer.
sure they need a mobile big due to hayes not panning out. glimmers of hope but he was not extended.



This post was edited on 1/18/23 at 9:03 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram