re: NBA top 100, per ESPN

quote:

---

I look at lists like this based on value. The higher the player is on the list, the more value they have.

---

It says "Top 100 players" not "Top 100 players who have the most value per contract and positional need."

quote:

---

 with Murray versus Watson, which one has more value in a trade? Or which one would teams want more?

---

Murray and Murray. If a team needs both positions equally and money doesn't matter then its Murray every time.

The only reason you could make a counter argument is the fact that Murray is older/ coming off injury and he still outplayed Watson before getting hurt and through his recovery year.

I'm not disagreeing with your premise, but the list needs to be "Top 100 current value" and not Top 100 NBA players.

If you are ranking the Top 100 players then its based on ability and not how much money they make. That's dumb.