Started By
Message

re: check in if you hate the trade

Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:09 pm to
Posted by TthomasJR
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2006
17312 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:09 pm to
How were we supposed to get Noel and Burke?
Posted by ZenFNmaster
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2007
2807 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:09 pm to
Jrue Holliday is already a proven commodity, is a beast and is still improving.
Time will show the Pelicans to be the big winner in this trade.
Posted by ssgtiger
Central
Member since Jan 2011
3283 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:10 pm to
I think Burke's ceiling is Kemba Walker. No thanks
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:10 pm to
It's stupid to say player X would be no. 1 based on what he's already done in the league.

By that logic, every player in the NBA would be a better pick than anyone who has never been in the NBA.
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17717 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:11 pm to
As a person who wanted to trade the pick months ago, I to Demps. There's no one with any basketball sense, would have passed up a chance to get an all star PG. Especially with all the bums in this years draft.
Posted by PEABODY32
Everywhere
Member since Feb 2011
1184 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:12 pm to
Krueger is a beast
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:12 pm to
No, Im saying if they had taken one of those guys and kept them. Or possibly McLemore.

I think having any if those 3 plus your first next year gives more long term flexibility than Jrue.
Posted by tehchampion140
Member since Sep 2010
18881 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:12 pm to
Just making the point that proven NBA talent is always more valuable than potential unless that potential is on Lebron-like levels.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:14 pm to
Burke's college percentages are off the charts. Comparable to guys like Paul, not Kemba walker,

I don't think he'll be THAT good, but I bet he's a very efficient, quality player who thrives in p&r.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
76141 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:15 pm to
quote:


I think having any if those 3 plus your first next year gives more long term flexibility than Jrue.

Flexibility doesn't necessarily equal better.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:16 pm to
No one has LeBron like potential.

So Jrue Holiday with 4 years experience has more value than Derrick Rose did when he was drafted?

And yes, I understand no one in this class has even Rose-like potential.
Posted by cajunfury87
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2010
116 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:18 pm to
Full disclosure: rockets fan who hast watched much hornet/pels.

It's all about championships. My question to those who think this was a good trade is does AD/Jrue get you to a championship 4 years from now? Because getting to the 4 seed isn't an accomplishment.

The only way to a championship is to get lucky through the draft or to make big moves in FA (which requires cap space, a hot commodity under the new CBA). Take Noel and hope he develops, knowing that next years team won't be good so next years pick is high. Hope AD develops into what he should be. Use the cap space to feast on other teams' desperation (like my rockets Hardin trade). Next years pick turns into a stud, maybe wiggins if you get lucky. Then you've got 2 or 3 good players on rookie deals and build from there. Then next year sign the best FA available (probably not that much worse than Holiday). Notice I said hope a lot, and people are bashing on the trade because its about potential. It probably wouldn't work out like that, but the way I see it its the only way to a legit great team. But taking Jrue and giving up cap space and picks means that you're resting your hopes on Holliday/davis/gordon and cannot build anymore because you've tied yourself down. Getting Jrue means you're done rebuilding, and you don't have enough to be done rebuilding.

Posted by tehchampion140
Member since Sep 2010
18881 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:18 pm to
I'm talking about Lebron-like potential coming into the draft. Taking a chance on a guy who you think will be one of the best players in the league. It's very likely that almost no one outside of the top 5 this year or next will ever be elite NBA talents. Like you said, no one this year had that sure potential. Every pick was a risk. We got a proven commodity for 2 risks and almost everyone loves it.
Posted by ssgtiger
Central
Member since Jan 2011
3283 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:19 pm to
I guess we can agree to disagree. I just know this is way better than I could have hoped for this draft to turn out. I really didnt like anyone in this draft, so getting to basically draft an all star pg is heaven for me.
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6250 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:21 pm to
Terrible trade. This guy isn't a top-shelf point guard. They had a chance to have 2 studs up front and with one more draft, they could be really good.
Now Demps has them set up to be the 8 seed for eternity.
And dont' expect any young players to develop, because Williams is terrible at it and has them shipped out for mediocre players time after time.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

Jrue is a far far better defender,


I agree.

quote:

Jrue had a better FG% the same 3 pt % but avg 1.3 pts less. Oh and Holiday had more assist. He did have more turnovers, but its not like Lillard didn't turn the ball over at a decent rate as well.


First of all, Lillard is younger and a rookie and posting similar, if not better numbers.

Lillard's TS% is .546
Holiday's TS% is .496

Holliday had a better AST% this year, but Lillard's rookie 28.8% is right on par with Holiday's career number (also 28.8%, which includes this years career high 36.5%).

Lillard took fewer shots than Jrue this year, and scored more. So he's a more efficient scorer.

Lillard's rookie TOV% is better than the percentage posted by Jrue in 3 of his 4 years in the league.

He's a vastly better offensive player.

Efficiency matters.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:27 pm to
I think, ultimately, if you are looking at the draft board and honestly thinking none of these guys can really help you (i.e., nothing more than back-end bench guys), then the trade looks better.

But I don't have much reason to trust Demps, honestly. We maxed Gordon, who is still a big question mark. You need Gordon healthy, focused and motivated. If so, he's really a great player (much better than Jrue). But we haven't seen any of those three things from him.

We wasted no. 10 on terrible Austin Rivers.

Posted by tehchampion140
Member since Sep 2010
18881 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

But I don't have much reason to trust Demps, honestly. We maxed Gordon, who is still a big question mark. You need Gordon healthy, focused and motivated. If so, he's really a great player (much better than Jrue). But we haven't seen any of those three things from him.

Didn't have much of a choice. We weren't getting anything in a S&T close to the value of a healthy Gordon. Most NBA GMs would and should take the risk of a 20PPG efficient scorer over some decent talent.
quote:

We wasted no. 10 on terrible Austin Rivers.


Absolutely can't call that pick a waste after 1 season. Not comparing the 2, but Kobe went from 7 points a game as a rookie to one of the greatest players ever. Give it some time before you call that pick a waste. Anyone watching him last year saw his flashes and can see that he has a chance to be a solid player.
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 10:31 pm
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

Anyone watching him last year saw his flashes and can see that he has a chance to be a solid player.





Good luck with that.

quote:

Didn't have much of a choice. We weren't getting anything in a S&T close to the value of a healthy Gordon. Most NBA GMs would and should take the risk of a 20PPG efficient scorer over some decent talent.


Yeah, that's true enough. Other than drafting Davis and picking up some nice unknown role players, we've hamstrung ourselves pretty well. We'll be a decently competitive team that never makes a huge dent in the West IMO.
Posted by lsuguy13
RIP MATT
Member since Mar 2004
9509 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 10:35 pm to
Read Cajun fury and obu Dan posts. That's how I feel. And we just picked another PG?
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram