Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Which was the bigger nuke?

Posted on 2/8/20 at 5:45 pm
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 2/8/20 at 5:45 pm
Appetite for Destruction or Nevermind?
Posted by TDcline
American Gardens building 11th flor
Member since Aug 2015
9281 posts
Posted on 2/8/20 at 6:49 pm to
AfD is the better Album but Nevermind had a bigger impact and gave a huge “frick you” to the music industry money machine.

I’ve been hungry for years for a band to do something similar to what Nevermind did. I hate today’s music industry so much.
Posted by CaptainPanic
18.44311,-64.764021
Member since Sep 2011
25582 posts
Posted on 2/8/20 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Nevermind had a bigger impact and gave a huge “frick you” to the music industry money machine.
Yet it was produced by one of the largest labels in the world

Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
13968 posts
Posted on 2/8/20 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Appetite for Destruction or Nevermind?


Nevermind ushered in a new genre. Appetite for destruction was hair music.
This post was edited on 2/8/20 at 7:16 pm
Posted by wilceaux
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2004
12396 posts
Posted on 2/8/20 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

AfD is the better Album


Nope
Posted by Big Bill
Down da Bayou
Member since Sep 2015
1378 posts
Posted on 2/8/20 at 10:17 pm to
AFD by a long ways
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39148 posts
Posted on 2/8/20 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Nevermind ushered in a new genre.

to the mainstream maybe. Grunge certainly wasn't new at that point.


quote:

Appetite for destruction was hair music.

I think AFD, and to a lesser extent Slave to the Grind, bridged the gap between hair metal and thrash. It was equal parts Motley Crue and Metallica.
This post was edited on 2/8/20 at 10:21 pm
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
13968 posts
Posted on 2/8/20 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

quote:
Nevermind ushered in a new genre.


to the mainstream maybe. Grunge certainly wasn't new at that point.





No it wasn't new.

Sonic youth probably was the first that made some sort of impact.
Posted by TigrrrDad
Member since Oct 2016
7095 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 11:11 am to
quote:

to the mainstream maybe


This. It didn’t create grunge, it made it mainstream. They were signed to a Geffen label, flooded MTV with videos, and raked in commercial dollars with Billboard-charting radio hits. It gave a bunch of whiny emo teens their own acceptable music. Instead of having to listen to their older brother’s music - the remnants of hair metal - they now had something that was their own AND commercially established as legitimate instead of fringe. Because despite theor whiny generations depressing emo nature, they just wanted to belong. I guess because they felt ignored by their parents who were fresh of the success and excess of the ‘80s. Worst era of music in history.

ETA: inb4OKBoomer...Gen X, not Boomer.
This post was edited on 2/9/20 at 11:16 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
259858 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 11:43 am to
quote:

I guess because they felt ignored by their parents who were fresh of the success and excess of the ‘80s. Worst era of music in history.


At the end of the 80s, people were tired of party anthems. Grunge just took darker, more introspective lyrics and it hit a chord with a lot of folks. I really enjoyed that short era of music, though I came of age in the late 70s, early 80s.

Apple by MLB was the first album I heard that made me think there had been a seismic shift in music.

Van Halen unleashed the movement that would later become hair metal in 1978. GnR Was the bookend on the other side of hair metal in 1998. People weren't satisfied with fluff anymore.

Posted by TigrrrDad
Member since Oct 2016
7095 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

People weren't satisfied with fluff anymore


Meh...during the ‘90s I was listening to bands like Metallica, Megadeth, and Pantera, who all had very powerful and meaningful lyrics without all that depressing emo crap. I detest Nirvana and everything they represented.

Literally just a few days ago, I finally forgave Dave Grohl for being in Nirvana and made a Foo Fighters playlist that I’ve been listening to nonstop, and I started learning a few Foo songs on guitar. My sudden fanaticism was launched by the Foo Fighters live “KISS Guy” video.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 1:58 pm to
Nevermind.

That album is still resonating with people today. AFD isnt in the way nevermind still does.
Posted by Sayre
Felixville
Member since Nov 2011
5503 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Appetite for destruction was hair music.



Where do people like you get this stupid shite? That album was one of the biggest nails in the coffin for hair metal.
Posted by Sayre
Felixville
Member since Nov 2011
5503 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 2:05 pm to
2 of the greatest albums ever made.

Could argue back and forth with myself for a while on the OP's question, but if you put a gun to my head I'd say Nevermind had a more immediate effect. Appetite took a minute to build up its head of steam, but the second I heard it, most other mainstream metal became 'Motley Who?' It was so much more real and dirty then the vast majority of the Winger/Poison/White Lion bullshite clogging up the airwaves.

Nevermind brought a whole other genre (indie, not grunge) of rock to the forefront overnight. Nirvana put so many great indie bands in the spotlight like the Meat Puppets. Looking over their whole catalog, Nirvana wasn't really even a grunge band.
This post was edited on 2/9/20 at 2:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram