- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Stones ' pop period is better than the beatle' Rock attempts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 10:30 pm
Fight me
Helter Skelter kicked arse tho
Helter Skelter kicked arse tho
4
Posted on 11/18/25 at 10:35 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:just like the OP
Playback on other websites has been disabled
Posted on 11/18/25 at 10:39 pm to Kafka
jesus, Chicken pay YouTube their cut
Posted on 11/18/25 at 11:44 pm to OWLFAN86
Stones are better than Beatles on every level.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 11:59 pm to DeltaTigerDelta
quote:Here's the attention you wanted.
Stones are better than Beatles on every level.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:04 am to OWLFAN86
I love both groups, but I'm not sure if I agree with this.
I will say this, everyone talks about how big Beatlemania was (it was), but in 1965-1966 the Stones were absolutely also on fire. They had hit after hit after hit.
BTW, the new Black and Blue box set is killer.
I will say this, everyone talks about how big Beatlemania was (it was), but in 1965-1966 the Stones were absolutely also on fire. They had hit after hit after hit.
BTW, the new Black and Blue box set is killer.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 8:08 am
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:06 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Stones are better than Beatles on every level.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:05 pm to Cdawg
quote:Let me list some ways in which this is preposterously wrong:
Stones are better than Beatles on every level.
a)The quality of the median song. The Beatles have ~185 originals. At least 100 of those (if not 150) are good enough to have been the envy of not just one hit wonders, but even decent bands that are well thought of. A litany of all-time, anthemic classics that somewhat define the Western canon. The Stones have - clustered at the top - an impressive array of all-timers. But there is so much middling dreck littered throughout.
b)Songwriting and the drive to write songs. I'm sure you're aware of the fact that The Beatles wrote and gave to the Stones their first big hit (I Wanna Be Your Man). Not only did they need to be spoonfed a new tune, but they didn't even realize it was POSSIBLE to write their own songs.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:06 pm to hogcard1964
quote:Sure, that was a fire time for the Stones. But they weren't even in the same universe as Beatlemania.
I will say this, everyone talks about how big Beatlemania was (it was), but in 1965-1966 the Stones were absolutely also on fire. They had hit after hit after hit.
And on top of that, they looked to glom onto Beatlemania whenever they could (e.g. All You Need Is Love).
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:07 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:Which songs outside of Helter Skelter are you claiming were "rock attempts"?
The Stones ' pop period is better than the beatle' Rock attempts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:36 pm to Big Scrub TX
So you didn't like my gif?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News