- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Robert Plant vs. Glenn Hughes vs. David Coverdale
Posted on 6/11/12 at 3:55 pm to TexasTiger1185
Posted on 6/11/12 at 3:55 pm to TexasTiger1185
quote:
I think Plant is the greatest rock voice of all time. Yes, I enjoy him more than Mercury. Now I'll duck I guess.
Nah, #1 and #1a in Rock frontman history, IMO. In no particular order.
Posted on 6/11/12 at 8:07 pm to parrotdr
quote:
Nah, #1 and #1a in Rock frontman history, IMO. In no particular order.
Wrong. They are among the best vocalists, but Mick Jagger is the best frontman.
Posted on 6/11/12 at 8:26 pm to notslim99
Although I give Zep the clear nod as my favorite band I don't give Plant the best voice or best frontman,although he was a hell of a lyricist.
I'd have to give both to Freddy,with Paul Rodgers a close second (voice),and Jagger (front).
Just watched a live Whitesnake dvd from London from a few years back and Coverdale was f#%kin killing it.
I'd have to give both to Freddy,with Paul Rodgers a close second (voice),and Jagger (front).
Just watched a live Whitesnake dvd from London from a few years back and Coverdale was f#%kin killing it.
Posted on 6/12/12 at 5:39 am to notslim99
Glenn because he still has his lungs .... 
Posted on 6/12/12 at 8:43 am to Haplochrom
quote:
i cant tell if you are being serious.
part of what makes queens sounds are the harmonies. the three of mercury, may, and taylor are the queen sound. its like boston without the harmonies. when rogers plays with queen, he just sings like he is in bad company, which offers no place for anyone to add harmonies.
it essentially cuts queen off from their signature sound in lieu of rogers getting to yell around the stage. roger taylor is as good of a second singer in a band, and the change effectively negated him.
I meant Mercury as a whole - not just vocalist but as front man. I prefer Jagger myself but Mercury was great for his band. Their vocals were excellent and you bring up a great point about Taylor and May.
Popular
Back to top


1





