Started By
Message

re: Mumford and Sons album "Babel" out tomorrow

Posted on 9/25/12 at 10:43 am to
Posted by NachoReb
ITP ATL
Member since Feb 2012
2486 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 10:43 am to
quote:

I don't think they've ever put out one bad song.


Roll Away Your Stone is freaking terrible IMO. I Will Wait...meh
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56927 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 11:34 am to
quote:

the song Babel

gives me a boner
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56927 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Roll Away Your Stone is freaking terrible IMO. I Will Wait...meh

If I had to pick on it would be Timsel
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56927 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 11:37 am to
I was hoping Home would make the album and To Darkness and The Enemy. All 3 are amazing
Posted by Lee Chatelain
Official TD Sauces Club Member
Member since Oct 2008
12570 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Pretty disappointed in it overall,


Um, I thought it was pretty good!
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Lee Chatelain
quote:

I thought it was pretty good
Now I know for sure to stay away from it.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
52570 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Blue Velvet



TL:DR



Which cd is better this or The killers new one?
This post was edited on 9/25/12 at 12:18 pm
Posted by Meursault
Member since Sep 2003
25262 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:21 pm to
After two listens I'm underwhelmed. It's not a bad album, but I feel like its basically Sigh No More, only more energetic. Listening to this album I feel like I've heard it before. They don't push boundaries, or explore any new territory. In fact most of the record sounds like they would be filler tracks on Sigh No More. They played it safe.

Honestly the whole feels like Nashville mega-church worship music.
This post was edited on 9/25/12 at 12:41 pm
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56927 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

but I feel like its basically Sigh No More, only more energetic
It's only their second album... cmon they aren't just gonna change their sound completely after one album. No band does that.
Posted by Meursault
Member since Sep 2003
25262 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:37 pm to
I wouldn't expect them to. Hell, I wouldn't expect any band to coming off the success of its predecessor. Same thing with Fleet Foxes. Although Helplessness Blues was a fantastic effort, to me, it still felt like just more of the same.

It's hard when you already know what to expect. That's why sophomore albums rarely ever meet the expectations set by amazing debuts.
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56927 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 2:28 pm to
Broken Crown is ballin, shotcallin
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
41262 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Which cd is better this or The killers new one?


i've been meaning to get the killers' new one, but i'm scared it's going to be bad. i dont want to ruin my perception of them
Posted by jumbo
Franklin
Member since Dec 2011
5063 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 8:28 am to
quote:

quail man




it's better than the last 2 for sure... not on the level of Sam's Town or Hot Fuss though
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:35 am to
I actually like this one better than "Sigh No More". More energetic, exactly what I wanted it to be.

*ducks*
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
74082 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:47 am to
quote:

They don't push boundaries, or explore any new territory


a band comes out with a new sound = "argh!!! they sold out, I liked their old stuff better!!!

a band comes out with similarly sounding music = "borrrrrrringgggg, been there done that, next!"

they cant win
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:58 am to
There is a huge danger of never expanding your style (and there is also a risk of expanding so far that it sucks...see Muse), but I don't mind it at all if a band decides to fine-tune the style of their previous album.
Posted by Meursault
Member since Sep 2003
25262 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:59 am to
It's tough, really tough, to make a sophomore album that meets expectations set by the debut. But for me, what makes a great second release is when a band can improve on their sound, while sticking to what made them popular.

In an earlier post I mentioned Fleet Foxes as a band whose second album wasn't as good as their first. But this is purely my opinion. I probably enjoyed their first album more simply due to personal reasons. However, to illustrate my point on improving their sound, consider what made them popular in the first place. It was folksy, woodsy, with incredible harmonizing vocals. In their next release, Helplessness Blues, they maintained all that, yet added additional instrumentation, and there was a subtle hint of psychedelic influences. Basically they at least tried to do something different and not release a B-sides album.

This is one example of a band who improved upon their sound without "selling out". In M&S's case, they took the safer route and released a second album that, to a lot of people, sounds the exact same as their first.
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
41262 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 10:07 am to
quote:

it's better than the last 2 for sure... not on the level of Sam's Town or Hot Fuss though


that's good to hear

quote:

but I don't mind it at all if a band decides to fine-tune the style of their previous album.


nor do I. especially with a band as young as mumford. plus, their kind of music is something that you rarely, if ever, hear. that's what makes it so awesome, to me. so i don't mind repetitiveness because I don't hear it otherwise.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 10:57 am to
quote:

nor do I. especially with a band as young as mumford. plus, their kind of music is something that you rarely, if ever, hear. that's what makes it so awesome, to me. so i don't mind repetitiveness because I don't hear it otherwise.

Boom. Hit the nail on the head.
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
41262 posts
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:31 am to
LINK

Great article on M&S from The Atlantic.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram