- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/25/12 at 11:34 am to quail man
quote:
the song Babel
gives me a boner
Posted on 9/25/12 at 11:35 am to NachoReb
quote:If I had to pick on it would be Timsel
Roll Away Your Stone is freaking terrible IMO. I Will Wait...meh
Posted on 9/25/12 at 11:37 am to NachoReb
I was hoping Home would make the album and To Darkness and The Enemy. All 3 are amazing
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:00 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
Pretty disappointed in it overall,
Um, I thought it was pretty good!
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:10 pm to Lee Chatelain
quote:
Lee Chatelain
quote:Now I know for sure to stay away from it.
I thought it was pretty good
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:12 pm to Blue Velvet
quote:
Blue Velvet
TL:DR
Which cd is better this or The killers new one?
This post was edited on 9/25/12 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:21 pm to CP3LSU25
After two listens I'm underwhelmed. It's not a bad album, but I feel like its basically Sigh No More, only more energetic. Listening to this album I feel like I've heard it before. They don't push boundaries, or explore any new territory. In fact most of the record sounds like they would be filler tracks on Sigh No More. They played it safe.
Honestly the whole feels like Nashville mega-church worship music.
Honestly the whole feels like Nashville mega-church worship music.
This post was edited on 9/25/12 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:24 pm to Meursault
quote:It's only their second album... cmon they aren't just gonna change their sound completely after one album. No band does that.
but I feel like its basically Sigh No More, only more energetic
Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:37 pm to Macintosh
I wouldn't expect them to. Hell, I wouldn't expect any band to coming off the success of its predecessor. Same thing with Fleet Foxes. Although Helplessness Blues was a fantastic effort, to me, it still felt like just more of the same.
It's hard when you already know what to expect. That's why sophomore albums rarely ever meet the expectations set by amazing debuts.
It's hard when you already know what to expect. That's why sophomore albums rarely ever meet the expectations set by amazing debuts.
Posted on 9/25/12 at 2:28 pm to NachoReb
Broken Crown is ballin, shotcallin
Posted on 9/25/12 at 7:20 pm to CP3LSU25
quote:
Which cd is better this or The killers new one?
i've been meaning to get the killers' new one, but i'm scared it's going to be bad. i dont want to ruin my perception of them
Posted on 9/26/12 at 8:28 am to quail man
quote:
quail man
it's better than the last 2 for sure... not on the level of Sam's Town or Hot Fuss though
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:35 am to Macintosh
I actually like this one better than "Sigh No More". More energetic, exactly what I wanted it to be.
*ducks*
*ducks*
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:47 am to Meursault
quote:
They don't push boundaries, or explore any new territory
a band comes out with a new sound = "argh!!! they sold out, I liked their old stuff better!!!
a band comes out with similarly sounding music = "borrrrrrringgggg, been there done that, next!"
they cant win
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:58 am to Pilot Tiger
There is a huge danger of never expanding your style (and there is also a risk of expanding so far that it sucks...see Muse), but I don't mind it at all if a band decides to fine-tune the style of their previous album.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:59 am to Pilot Tiger
It's tough, really tough, to make a sophomore album that meets expectations set by the debut. But for me, what makes a great second release is when a band can improve on their sound, while sticking to what made them popular.
In an earlier post I mentioned Fleet Foxes as a band whose second album wasn't as good as their first. But this is purely my opinion. I probably enjoyed their first album more simply due to personal reasons. However, to illustrate my point on improving their sound, consider what made them popular in the first place. It was folksy, woodsy, with incredible harmonizing vocals. In their next release, Helplessness Blues, they maintained all that, yet added additional instrumentation, and there was a subtle hint of psychedelic influences. Basically they at least tried to do something different and not release a B-sides album.
This is one example of a band who improved upon their sound without "selling out". In M&S's case, they took the safer route and released a second album that, to a lot of people, sounds the exact same as their first.
In an earlier post I mentioned Fleet Foxes as a band whose second album wasn't as good as their first. But this is purely my opinion. I probably enjoyed their first album more simply due to personal reasons. However, to illustrate my point on improving their sound, consider what made them popular in the first place. It was folksy, woodsy, with incredible harmonizing vocals. In their next release, Helplessness Blues, they maintained all that, yet added additional instrumentation, and there was a subtle hint of psychedelic influences. Basically they at least tried to do something different and not release a B-sides album.
This is one example of a band who improved upon their sound without "selling out". In M&S's case, they took the safer route and released a second album that, to a lot of people, sounds the exact same as their first.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 10:07 am to WarSlamEagle
quote:
it's better than the last 2 for sure... not on the level of Sam's Town or Hot Fuss though
that's good to hear
quote:
but I don't mind it at all if a band decides to fine-tune the style of their previous album.
nor do I. especially with a band as young as mumford. plus, their kind of music is something that you rarely, if ever, hear. that's what makes it so awesome, to me. so i don't mind repetitiveness because I don't hear it otherwise.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 10:57 am to quail man
quote:
nor do I. especially with a band as young as mumford. plus, their kind of music is something that you rarely, if ever, hear. that's what makes it so awesome, to me. so i don't mind repetitiveness because I don't hear it otherwise.
Boom. Hit the nail on the head.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:31 am to WarSlamEagle
Popular
Back to top

3







