- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Garth Brooks the GOAT?
Posted on 7/13/15 at 1:08 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
Posted on 7/13/15 at 1:08 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
And Garth Brooks did?
Kind of, for his genre. He showed that you could absolutely put on a show AND have good country music. In his prime he was thought to be a bit too progressive for the old school country folks but looking back he was still a very "cowboy-like" artist. He arrived on the scene when country music had become pretty stale with people like Barbara Mandrel and Keith Whitley topping the charts. Garth's first album in '89 kind of set a new tone for country music and then No Fences in '90 blew the doors off the genre.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 1:22 pm to MightyYat
Calling anything Garth Brooks did more revolutionary than LZ or the Stones is ignorant at best.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 1:35 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Calling anything Garth Brooks did more revolutionary than LZ or the Stones is ignorant at best.
Yeah, I never said that. The Stones and Zeppelin were taking their genres to another level the same way Garth did. They all belong in the same sentence right behind the Beatles because those cats changed music forever.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 1:56 pm to MightyYat
quote:
They all belong in the same sentence
No they don't.
He's an unremarkable musician at best who doesn't write the majority of his own songs.
You're not very good at this.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 2:04 pm to UPT
quote:
No they don't.
He's an unremarkable musician at best who doesn't write the majority of his own songs.
You're not very good at this.
You're not too good at this either.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 5:19 pm to MightyYat
quote:
The Beatles were definitely revolutionary. They pretty much shaped modern day music. However, their greatness wasn't realized until after they were popular. A lot of people back then thought of them like many think of One Direction today.
The Beatles are given so much credit that they don't deserve. It's ridiculous. I bet you wrote the above with a straight face.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 5:22 pm to MightyYat
quote:
He actually wrote or co-wrote a large portion of his bigger songs.
You're not too good at this eithe
Oh, he cowrote some of his song? How quaint.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 6:41 pm to The Boat
He is a great country singer, but he's definitely not the GOAT. Sorry.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:28 pm to The Boat
Garth is proof that the avg American music consumer has no taste. 
Posted on 7/13/15 at 10:20 pm to cwill
Ok, I've pled my case enough here. Try to keep an open mind when it comes to such subjective things like music. Think of all the artists that have come and gone in the history of music. Garth Brooks sits at #2 in albums sold. #2. Despite what the snobs say, he's been doing something right.

Posted on 7/13/15 at 10:27 pm to MightyYat
quote:
Think of all the artists that have come and gone in the history of music. Garth Brooks sits at #2 in albums sold. #2
#2 in the US. Much lower down the list worldwide.
America generally has poor taste in music compared to the rest of the world. Case in point: hip hop and country top the charts here. It's pathetic.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 10:47 pm to MightyYat
He is a formulaic music salesman. There's no art to his songs.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 11:06 pm to cwill
quote:
He is a formulaic music salesman. There's no art to his songs.
Holy shite. This board is ridiculous.
Popular
Back to top

1






