- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Black Keys Suing Baton Rouge Casino for ripping off song:
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:09 pm
LINK
quote:
According to The Hollywood Reporter, The Black Keys have one more reason to sing the blues. Coming straight off the heels of settling lawsuits with Pizza Hut and Home Depot over improper use of the duo’s songs in commercials, the band is now suing Manhattan Production Music and Pinnacle Entertainment for, respectively, recording and then making use of a song that is suspiciously similar to The Black Keys’ “Howlin’ For You,” all to promote Pinnacle’s L’Auberge Casino & Hotel in Baton Rouge.
In addition to allegedly arguing via the ad's YouTube page that the track was merely “inspired by” the song, the casino also allegedly responded to a Keys fan who mentioned the use of the song on Twitter, claiming, “We bought a licensed musical interpretation of the song.” The Keys are also suing on the basis of trademark law violation and the creation of unfair competition, in addition to the copyright infringement complaint.
To be fair, the songs aren’t exactly the same: The Pinnacle version feels a little tidier than the Keys’ grittier garage sound. That said, claiming a song is “inspired” by another song, when all it really inspired you to do was to write pretty much the same song, probably doesn’t count as “inspiration.” And it also probably isn’t the best idea to flat-out admit that your song is a “licensed musical interpretation,” considering everyone knows that isn’t a real thing. Hopefully Pinnacle will learn to trust its own creative spirit a little more next time.
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:29 pm to TheDoc
Theyre on a suing spree
Im worried ill get served for playing them on my ipod
Im worried ill get served for playing them on my ipod
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:30 pm to wildtigercat93
in their defense, there are a lot of people trying to rip them off.
it's not essentially them who are going after all these businesses, it's their lawyers, agents, managers, etc.
lots of money in those commercials...
it's not essentially them who are going after all these businesses, it's their lawyers, agents, managers, etc.
lots of money in those commercials...
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:34 pm to TheDoc
I remember in the early 90s, British Knight, of all companies, approached Superchunk about using one of their songs in a commercial... They declined and so BK told them they'd just get some band to ape their sound.... So, then they OK and used the money to buy a new tour van...
I think it's silly
I think it's silly
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:41 pm to TFTC
bands 20 years ago could make money off of records
it's not the same ballgame as it once was...
bands are making way more money touring, and having songs in commercials than selling cd's
in another 10 years, CD's will be obsolete for the most part
it's not the same ballgame as it once was...
bands are making way more money touring, and having songs in commercials than selling cd's
in another 10 years, CD's will be obsolete for the most part
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:50 pm to TheDoc
Not indie bands... Most made money off of touring. Now Mac and Laura own Merge, so they make money in other ways.
And the ones that signed were usually so deep in the hole to the label, they never saw real money before they were eventually dropped.
I won't say it's selling out anymore, but it is what it is. Now, I think that lawsuit is just silly...
And the ones that signed were usually so deep in the hole to the label, they never saw real money before they were eventually dropped.
I won't say it's selling out anymore, but it is what it is. Now, I think that lawsuit is just silly...
Posted on 3/2/13 at 10:09 pm to TFTC
I don't think selling your song to a commercial is selling out at all.
And I'm pretty idealistic
And I'm pretty idealistic
Posted on 3/2/13 at 10:13 pm to TheDoc
I think it was viewed like that much more so back then, when the indie movement was a lot more idealistic... Signing to a major was selling out ...
Posted on 3/2/13 at 10:15 pm to TheDoc
quote:
I don't think selling your song to a commercial is selling out at all
My goodness how times have changed
The shitstorm that broke over this!
Posted on 3/2/13 at 10:19 pm to TheDoc
quote:
in another 10 years, CD's will be obsolete for the most part
Id give it 5 max and you could argue theyre basically obsolete now
Posted on 3/2/13 at 10:21 pm to TheDoc
The casino's version sounded the closest to BK. Blatantly obvious. I see no problem here.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 3:18 am to PurpleNGoldFan
quote:
The casino's version sounded the closest to BK. Blatantly obvious. I see no problem here.
Hence why it's been Deleted from YouTube
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:29 am to Kafka
The indie bands of the 90s have never really cared about commercials for precisely the reason BK says -- advertisers will just get someone to ape their sound. It's why Moby sold every song on his album to an advertiser. They are just gonna copy you anyway.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:36 am to Baloo
quote:
They are just gonna copy you anyway.
yep, might as well be compensated for someone wanting to promote your art.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 11:06 am to TheDoc
Vanilla Ice explained his take on copyright infringement like this:
"Theirs goes: dun dun dun dundundun dun."
"Ours goes: dun dun dun dundundun dun tsss."
"Theirs goes: dun dun dun dundundun dun."
"Ours goes: dun dun dun dundundun dun tsss."
Posted on 3/3/13 at 11:49 am to ezride25
Good artists copy, great artists steal
Popular
Back to top
3









