- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Artists that refuse to allow their music on Spotify
Posted on 11/16/12 at 9:34 am
Posted on 11/16/12 at 9:34 am
WHY?
Do they think that instant subscription services are a fad and we're going to go back to selling albums soon?
Some notables:
Garth Brooks
Pink Floyd
Led Zeppelin
Who else you got?
Do they think that instant subscription services are a fad and we're going to go back to selling albums soon?
Some notables:
Garth Brooks
Pink Floyd
Led Zeppelin
Who else you got?
Posted on 11/16/12 at 9:51 am to WikiTiger
If you're big enough, there's no way you should participate:
LINK
It's not that it's a fad, it's that these companies don't pay you crap. Why should musicians be expected to give away their work for free? OK, 35 cents.
LINK
quote:
Consider Pandora and Spotify, the streaming music services that are becoming ever more integrated into our daily listening habits. My BMI royalty check arrived recently, reporting songwriting earnings from the first quarter of 2012, and I was glad to see that our music is being listened to via these services. Galaxie 500's "Tugboat", for example, was played 7,800 times on Pandora that quarter, for which its three songwriters were paid a collective total of 21 cents, or seven cents each. Spotify pays better: For the 5,960 times "Tugboat" was played there, Galaxie 500's songwriters went collectively into triple digits: $1.05 (35 cents each).
To put this into perspective: Since we own our own recordings, by my calculation it would take songwriting royalties for roughly 312,000 plays on Pandora to earn us the profit of one-- one-- LP sale. (On Spotify, one LP is equivalent to 47,680 plays.)
Or to put it in historical perspective: The "Tugboat" 7" single, Galaxie 500's very first release, cost us $980.22 for 1,000 copies-- including shipping! (Naomi kept the receipts)-- or 98 cents each. I no longer remember what we sold them for, but obviously it was easy to turn at least a couple bucks' profit on each. Which means we earned more from every one of those 7"s we sold than from the song's recent 13,760 plays on Pandora and Spotify. Here's yet another way to look at it: Pressing 1,000 singles in 1988 gave us the earning potential of more than 13 million streams in 2012. (And people say the internet is a bonanza for young bands...)
It's not that it's a fad, it's that these companies don't pay you crap. Why should musicians be expected to give away their work for free? OK, 35 cents.
Posted on 11/16/12 at 10:09 am to WikiTiger
Matchbox 20. Just noticed this last night.
Posted on 11/16/12 at 10:41 am to Baloo
It's not the artists, it's the labels wiki
Posted on 11/16/12 at 11:11 am to TheDoc
yeah i tried to listen to some ledzep the other day and was pretty pissed when all they had were tribute bands
Posted on 11/16/12 at 11:52 am to Delacroix
Tool isn't.
I don't think they're on itunes either.
I don't think they're on itunes either.
Posted on 11/16/12 at 1:35 pm to WikiTiger
Beatles
Led Zeppelin
Red Hot Chili Peppers only recently added theirs
Steve Miller Band only has one or two legit albums
I just noticed Wings added theirs! But kinda
Led Zeppelin
Red Hot Chili Peppers only recently added theirs
Steve Miller Band only has one or two legit albums
I just noticed Wings added theirs! But kinda
Posted on 11/16/12 at 1:45 pm to WikiTiger
Yeah zep and pink floyd are pretty big ones. I only pulled the trigger on premium after I checked to make sure they had all the dead's dick's picks. Lol dick pics
Posted on 11/16/12 at 3:54 pm to Baloo
quote:
Why should musicians be expected to give away their work for free? OK, 35 cents.
because the market has changed
Posted on 11/16/12 at 4:01 pm to WikiTiger
quote:
because the market has changed
I agree with this. The only big one for me really is Led Zeppelin and maybe a few Metallica. I'd rather not pay the artists on iTunes because of the inconvenience it causes me, haha.
Posted on 11/16/12 at 4:06 pm to Baloo
quote:> Free from piracy
35 cents.
Posted on 11/16/12 at 4:11 pm to WikiTiger
ive been complaining about this for years
really does piss me off
really does piss me off
Posted on 11/16/12 at 4:12 pm to WikiTiger
quote:
because the market has changed
This.
Either take money willingly or go frick off and I'll steal it like its 1999. Doesn't make a shite of a difference to me.
Popular
Back to top
5






