re: The Catholic League Responds To South Park

quote:

---

No one is celebrating. No one

---

You don't think hollyywood celebrates homosexuality?

You don't think the media has deliberately used the word pedophile in order to gloss over who is actually preying on these boys?

quote:

---

People referre to Roy Moore as a pedo

---

Stupid people. people who would send Doug Jones to Washington thinking he represents their values.

quote:

---

You are moving the goalposts. The statement was about celebrating with a 14 year old

---

The goalpost hasn't been moved. I don't think you understood what she was saying.

She said the media celebrates homosexuality. She also said that because they do, that wouldn't allow them to call the predators homosexuals. She was not saying the media celebrates the molestation of boys.

When I first read Erin's statement I knew what she was saying but when I read the comments that followed I knew others didn't.

quote:

---

Those people are smart enough not to vote for a wing nut who is also a creep

---

I'm going to go ahead and say anyone who voted for Doug Jomes is probably not a deep thinker and leave it at that.

quote:

---

Your position is that the real problem is not the Catholic Church, but homosexuals who have infiltrated the Catholic Church and are preying on teenagers?

---

No, as much as people want to publicly make this about pedophilia strictly, it isn't. The pedophiles, while a huge problem morally, aren't the core issue in the church. The protection of them is. Outing the problems and having them dealt with can be done, however, they are protected.

And the fact of the matter is, the pedophiles are protected by a network of homosexual bishops, priests, and cardinals. It's all connected, as I said mutually assured destruction is rampant. Secrets, lies, etc. And everyone protecting anyone. There is a large cadre of homosexual bishops and cardinals that have been protected for decades via this power structure. Read up on the whole McCarick issue. He wasn't a pedophile, he rose to power and abused that power via homosexual relations with CLERGY, mostly from Seminaries. These were not kids. And this is the case for most of the bishops who are protecting the pedophiles, they are homosexuals, and don't want the churches' problems brought to light, because that would destroy the power structure that was built. They have built a controlled, men's only subculture where they wield all of the power.

The point the show is trying to make is that there ARE good priests, but the fate of good priests is controlled by, you guessed it, a network of bishops and cardinals who are mostly homosexual or those with sexual deviancies, again connected by the culture. Good priests are somewhat powerless.

Pedophilia is easy for everyone to hate, that's why the focus is put on it.

You want to read about McCarick and know what's really going on, here you go: LINK If the Church pursued the real problem, they'd be under fire immediately, that's the problem.

McCarick used diocesan funds to build a beach cabin where he could take adult, male seminarians for retreat weekends and offer to share a bed. That should be an indicator of a power structure of older homosexual adult men grooming younger homosexual men. But for some odd reason, it's popular to focus on the sickness of pedophilia than to admit that there are homosexual predators who have infiltrated the church's power structure.

I have a couple friends who went into the seminary as faithful young men in the 90's and they never saw or experienced anything untoward, but it quickly became uncomfortable for them living with flamboyant guys who dominated the TV set to watch soap operas and musicals. If they admitted having normal interests in women, they might be told by a superior that they didn't have a vocation (though never told exactly why). And both became happily married (to women) after they left.

quote:

---

This statement is actually completely inaccurate

---

No it's actually not. He's talking about the priesthood.

And per capita, it's actually off the carts with the gays, so "more" doesn't really mean much.

quote:

---

portrayed molesting priests as pedophiles. This is factually inaccurate:  almost all the molesters–8 in 10–have been homosexuals. Therefore, the cartoon-victim characters should have been depicted as adolescents, not kids. 


No part of this makes any sense.

---

show us on the doll where he touched you