Started By
Message

re: Save Dan Mullen!!!

Posted on 4/17/10 at 11:28 am to
Posted by Acreboy
Member since Nov 2005
38568 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 11:28 am to
quote:

actually i think dan read too many imdb boards and just straight up jacked threads from there

if dan's threads are any indication of what imdb boards are like, i want no part of them. ever.
he's a more powerful person than i thought if he could make it out alive of those boards. they're terribly fricking horrible.
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15597 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 11:31 am to
quote:

he's a more powerful person than i thought if he could make it out alive of those boards. they're terribly fricking horrible.


AT one point I was starting to think Dan was a robot/ post-bot. That maybe Dan was really some A.I. experiment, and he was really just a posting application running a posting algorithm that would eventually result in quality threads. However, it appears as though the programing was flawed or there was an error somewhere in the code, as the posts did not improve in quality on quantity.


But I believe another poster claims to know Dan, IRL. But said poster, may only be the applications creator. ???

Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81444 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Do we really need 8 threads on the front page about 80's comedies and real world girls?


at one point there was like 9 stickies on this board
Posted by Acreboy
Member since Nov 2005
38568 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 11:45 am to
quote:

at one point there was like 9 stickies on this board

the person who stickied the threads is more responsible for those than the person who started them.
Posted by Feed Me Popeyes
Baltimore, MD
Member since Apr 2008
2104 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 11:54 am to
quote:

That maybe Dan was really some A.I. experiment, and he was really just a posting application running a posting algorithm that would eventually result in quality threads


Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47156 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Learn to simply skip a post you don't want to read.


lulz. That leaves me with like 2 thread topics to choose from on the first page on most days. Again, why this board sucks way worse than it used to.

quote:

As I said in my first post. I find all of th4 vs posts to be annoying, I just simply don't think they are ban worthy or even timeout worthy.


they are definitely "Slow the frick down or stop posting" worthy though.
Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47156 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

this dude didn't care at all TRUST HIM but since everyone is here he'll reply 50 times about the travesty


no shite. He is like a martyr for a cause he doesn't give a shite about.
Posted by Acreboy
Member since Nov 2005
38568 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 3:00 pm to
MJC you know what happened? he have some beef with you over something?
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81444 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 3:01 pm to
look he put free hat. he's obviously just kidding!!!!!!
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40779 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Again, why this board sucks way worse than it used to.


Hey hey hey, outside of a few guys, the m/tv board is pretty awesome imo.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40779 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

look he put free hat. he's obviously just kidding!!!!!!


lulz
Posted by Acreboy
Member since Nov 2005
38568 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Hey hey hey, outside of a few guys, the m/tv board is pretty awesome imo.

people just don't have patience. they had one guy post on the OT a thread about a movie because "no one responded" here.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40779 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

people just don't have patience. they had one guy post on the OT a thread about a movie because "no one responded" here.


Yeah it is what it is. But on the other hand you start a thread and 2-3 days later it's still on the 1st page which is kind of cool.
If someone starts a "I just watched Dodgeball" thread and all they put is "what did you think of it?". It's not going to get a lot of responses. Your post normally have to have some substance around here.
Posted by Acreboy
Member since Nov 2005
38568 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 3:33 pm to
we do get a lot of the opposite as well. people are so fricking lazy if they don't see a thread past the scroll bar they assume they don't have one and you have 2-3 threads of the same topic on one page.
Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47156 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

look he put free hat. he's obviously just kidding!!!!!!




he aint 4 real
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
61611 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 6:17 pm to
Listen here asshat, I've never RA'd anybody ever. My beef with Dan was always on this board bc he starts about 7 to 10 stupid arse threads a day over and over on something he has absolutely no knowledge about. It would clutter up the board and make it less enjoyable. The most I've ever done was joke with chicken about paying him $500 to not let Dan START THREADS on this board. The problem is, all he did was start threads and never contributed to anythng else. Lame and tired threads at that.

Ever notice I never gave him shite on the SEC Rant?
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41044 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 6:46 pm to
I find it amusing that some of you have attacked me for taking things too seriously yet that was my whole point. Just don't take Dan so seriously.

Still don't feel any ban was necessary because I don't take him too seriously.

It is actually all of you that need to chill out and take things (bad posts) less seriously.

Martyr? Don't see that I came off or tried to come off as a martyr. Attack all you want, but the South Park pic was put there to show I wasn't being so serious.


We do things a touch different over here. We actually debate issues instead of attacking posters. (most times)

Really Maximus, I posted 50 times. Sure doesn't say much for the Math Department at LSU.

Also, it is my post so it is pretty normal for the person that starts the post to respond.

MJC,

Not sure what happened to you pal, you used to be fairly easy going but lately you haven't been.

Oh and once again back to me taking things to seriously, some of you have stated you could no longer come to the movie board because of Dan's posts.

Clean the sand out of it! If someones boring posts keep you from coming to a board then it is CLEARLY you that takes things too seriously.

As far as Dan is concerned, Archie hit the nail on the head. I am more concerned with censorship than Dan. Just check my posts. I have almost never posted in his nonsense.

For the most part, I stay away from the vs and lists threads unless female pics are involved.

And attack the South Park pic, but anyone that isn't being an irrational dick could see I was trying to be somewhat funny. Admittedly that failed miserably.

and Happy Saturday even to you asshats. I just left one crawfish boil and now I am off to another so I am good to go.
This post was edited on 4/17/10 at 6:47 pm
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
61611 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 7:09 pm to
FWIW myth, I think you're a solid poster here.

Dan was starting that many threads over and over for one of two reasons. He did it to garner attention for his acted ignorance or he actually is that stupid. I'm willing to let him answer. He does the same type crap on the SEC rant bit its tolerable over there bc its maybe 1 thread every two days not 10 everyday.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40779 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

and Happy Saturday even to you asshats. I just left one crawfish boil and now I am off to another so I am good to go.


Posted by LSUCanFAN
In the past
Member since Jan 2009
28097 posts
Posted on 4/17/10 at 7:48 pm to
TM you have made your point. I am certain the admins are posthumously reexaming Dan's ban....
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram