1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Russell Brand Found Guilty of Rape
Posted on 11/9/26 at 4:17 pm to blueboy
Posted on 11/9/26 at 4:17 pm to blueboy
quote:
What 'evidence' would that be? The case was 100% he said, she said.
Direct witness testimony is considered a form of direct evidence. And in this case, you have direct witness testimony from 6 complainants/accusers. Not to mention the large amount of indirect testimony from others.
The jury of his peers, in this case, 8 men and 4 women felt that the burden of proof was met.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 4:28 pm to taylork37
quote:Right, so 'she said' with nothing else.
Direct witness testimony
And what she (rape conviction) said was that although she willingly ate his arse ten minutes after she met him and willingly had vaginal sex with him, he then put it in her arse, so RAPE!! All just because she said so.
The other convictions were a girl who said he pulled her into a bathroom stall and groped her, and one who said he stuck his face in her crotch while she was giving him a massage. Both based solely on testimony. After 20 years of not saying shite.
10 years. Just say you're a bootlicker, man.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 11/9/26 at 4:46 pm to blueboy
quote:
Just say you're a bootlicker, man.
Says the dude in the echo chamber who clearly made up his mind before doing any research. Now you are just in confirmation bias mode. There is too much reporting on this and the evidence given at trial to just call this he said, she said. Not to mention the context of how much of a fricking pervert Brand has been over the years.
All because he turned to right wing politics, whether you admit it or not. If this was someone like Biden you would calling for his execution.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 4:58 pm to taylork37
quote:
There is too much reporting on this and the evidence given at trial to just call this he said, she said.
But that's all it is. You can dress it up any way you like but he said, she said is 100% accurate. And I really, really don't understand giving credibility to people who wait 15-20 years to decide that something wasn't consensual.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 5:08 pm to Flats
There is so much more nuance to it than he said she said, if you would actually dig into the testimony from the accusers and the secondary witnesses. You won't do that though. Not to mention how Russell went from not knowing some of these victims when asked to then all of a sudden knowing them and just claiming it was all consensual.
This whole "why did you wait" thing is such a cop out argument. The belief that no one will believe you if you come out against a celebrity is a real thing and it took the 2023 documentary for these victims to come forward because they now know it happened to others.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 11/9/26 at 5:23 pm to taylork37
quote:
This whole "why did you wait" thing is such a cop out argument.
I didn't ask why they waited and it's not an argument, it's a statement. Waiting that long heavily damages their credibility in my eyes, I don't care what the crime is. If it increases their credibility for you, that's fine. I find it laughable.
From what little I know of Brand it wouldn't surprise me a bit if he did at least some of what he's been accused of. It also wouldn't surprise me one bit if these are bullshite imaginary charges, so I don't think anybody should be going to jail. I think they should have been laughed out of the courtroom, and I'd say the exact same thing if Brand got reamed by Will Smith 20 years ago and in 2026 decided it was rape.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 5:39 pm to taylork37
quote:So if the media reports on it a lot, it must be true?
There is too much reporting on this
quote:That is all there was a trial. You even admitted it.
and the evidence given at trial to just call this he said, she said
quote:So, like every male celebrity for decades. Okay, but getting laid is not rape, and that's all that can be proven as he attested to there being sex.
how much of a fricking pervert Brand has been over the years.
quote:A guy whose own daughter wrote in her diary that she couldn't shower during normal hours because her dad would get in with her. Good choice.
Biden
But if I saw the facts of a case against him and thought it was bullshite, I'd definitely say so. If he were to be falsely convicted, I would definitely note that such a thing could and would go both ways.
So, no. I wouldn;t be asking for his execution.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 5:41 pm to NighthawkDawg
quote:
Courts literally found him guilty, the amount of delusion some of y'all choose to live in
Jeez man. Open your eyes already.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 6:11 pm to blueboy
quote:
So if the media reports on it a lot, it must be true?
Stop with the placeholder arguments. This isnt the media saying guilty/not guilty, its accounts of the actual testimony. Go actually do at least a quick Google search or something, its the least you can do.
quote:You have completely ignored what I posted. Its more than he said/ she said and I haven't said otherwise.
That is all there was a trial. You even admitted it
quote:So you are saying that because male celebrities are perverts historically, who the frick should care about this?
So, like every male celebrity for decades
quote:So the women attested to rape, but because all he attested to was sex, it couldnt be more than sex? Did you reread this before posting?
Okay, but getting laid is not rape, and that's all that can be proven as he attested to there being sex.
quote:You cannot make this shite up
A guy whose own daughter wrote in her diary that she couldn't shower during normal hours because her dad would get in with her. Good choice.
. Is this not he said/she said according to your continued shitposting? Bro. quote:
But if I saw the facts of a case against him and thought it was bullshite, I'd definitely say so. If he were to be falsely convicted, I would definitely note that such a thing could and would go both ways.
Sure thing bud.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 6:17 pm to Flats
quote:
Waiting that long heavily damages their credibility in my eyes, I don't care what the crime is. If it increases their credibility for you, that's fine. I find it laughable.
It doesnt increase credibility AT ALL, stop with the hyperbole. With that said unlike the PT board echo chamber, right wing, stooge thought process it doesnt completely negate the argument either like it does for you.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 11/9/26 at 6:21 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Jeez man. Open your eyes already
Oh the irony.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 6:25 pm to taylork37
quote:It's the ,media repeating their claims, yes. It's not a verification of guilt. It's disturbing that you see that as such a powerful authority.
its accounts of the actual testimony
quote:Yeah, I have. He was a horn dog. So are a lot of celebs, and there are legions of women who enjoy indulging them. Doesn't mean they're rapists. Is this like some bizarro reverse slut shaming or something?
Go actually do at least a quick Google search
quote:No, dipshit. It means that him admitting to sex doesn't prove there was rape, nor does her testimony alone. And your claim that a 20 year delay is reasonable is disingenuous at best..
So the women attested to rape, but because all he attested to was sex, it couldnt be more than sex?
quote:I don't have to. Her diary is confirmed by the FBI.
You cannot make this shite up
quote:Not everyone is a cheerleader like you, bud.
Sure thing bud.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 6:41 pm to blueboy
Unless you are going to respond to each of my comments with the context I provided, this argument is over.
Your brain cant do anything but dumb down the situation to the simplest "if this happened, then this has to be true" contextless arguments. Rinse repeat.
Your brain cant do anything but dumb down the situation to the simplest "if this happened, then this has to be true" contextless arguments. Rinse repeat.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 6:55 pm to taylork37
The rinse repeat is the now very familiar formula - multiple accusers from many years ago, total lack of physical evidence and complicit, sympathetic media and kangaroo courts, when they could get them. Whether it's a Supreme Court nominee or an actor in someone's way, it's always the same strategy.
The MeToo movement has been little more than a blackmail and destruction movement. Just say 'yay, the guy I don't like is in jail' and get it over with.
The MeToo movement has been little more than a blackmail and destruction movement. Just say 'yay, the guy I don't like is in jail' and get it over with.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 7:01 pm to blueboy
quote:
The rinse repeat is the now very familiar formula - multiple accusers from many years ago, total lack of physical evidence and complicit, sympathetic media and kangaroo courts, when they could get them. Whether it's a Supreme Court nominee or an actor in someone's way, it's always the same strategy.
The MeToo movement has been little more than a blackmail and destruction movement. Just say 'yay, the guy I don't like is in jail' and get it over with.
Like I said, rinse and repeat. How long before you call me a libtard marxist.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 7:12 pm to taylork37
quote:You keep saying this like it's the only possible explanation for someone disagreeing with you. That's textbook light-switch brain thinking.
the PT board echo chamber, right wing, stooge
An then you question other people's intelligence.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 7:26 pm to blueboy
quote:
You keep saying this like it's the only possible explanation for someone disagreeing with you. That's textbook light-switch brain thinking.
And you have repeated the same he said she said argument as the only explanation and it matches the large majority argument on the OT, MTV, and PT boards.
quote:
An then you question other people's intelligence
Fair enough. Intelligence doesn't necessarily come in to play when you don't have a thought of your own.
Like I said before. Rinse, repeat.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 7:34 pm to taylork37
quote:
Oh the irony.
You won't be able to quantify this.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 7:41 pm to taylork37
quote:
and it matches the large majority argument on the OT, MTV, and PT boards.
Yeah, that can't possibly mean that we're right. Surely, it must mean we're all MAGA zealots.quote:Indeed
Rinse, repeat.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 7:59 pm to blueboy
quote:
Yeah, that can't possibly mean that we're right.
Reddit would agree.
quote:
Surely, it must mean we're all MAGA zealots.
Self awareness would like a word.
Page 10 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News